计算机艺术——一种矛盾修饰法?主流观点

D. Spencer, H. Rand, K. Huffman, P. Pearlstein, B. Riley, Will Stapp, Vivian Rainer
{"title":"计算机艺术——一种矛盾修饰法?主流观点","authors":"D. Spencer, H. Rand, K. Huffman, P. Pearlstein, B. Riley, Will Stapp, Vivian Rainer","doi":"10.1145/77276.77288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hello. My name is Dorothy Spencer, and this is a special session entitled Computer Art - An Oxymoron? Views from the Mainstream.Before I introduce the panel members I want to tell you two things briefly about the session. First I'm going to tell you what the session does not focus on, and to do that I'm going to read from the SIGGRAPH 89 Show daily that came out this morning. So, for any of you that read it and came here expecting to hear museum curators, gallery owners and artists discuss the evolution of computer art as a means for artistic expression, you can go away now; we're not going to do it.What we are going to do is talk about the fact that computer generated imagery --- although it's been around for several decades, the mainstream art world has been slow to acknowledge it as a viable medium for the creation of fine art. There have been few computer art exhibitions and even fewer reviews. Like photography, is computer art going to take three-quarters of a century before it's accepted into the mainstream?Is it partially the fault of the artist? Are artists too wrapped up in the technological processes to be concerned with the aesthetic results?Does the majority of the artists using the computer not participate in regular juried shows because they feel their work is not understood?Does the technology need to be understood before the work can be judge aesthetically?These are just a few of the questions that we hope to discuss this morning and hopefully we'll have answers for. After each panelist has made his or her presentation, we'll let the panelists respond to each other's remarks before we let you people loose with questions and answers.My first panelist is Harry Rand. He's curator of painting and sculpture at the Museum of American Art in Washington, D.C. He'll be followed by Kathy Huffman, She's the director of the Institute of Contemporary Art, Boston. Followed by Philip Pearlstein, internationally-known artist and former professor of painting at Brooklyn College; Bob Riley, curator of media art, San Francisco Museum of Modern Art; Will Stapp, curator of photography of the National Portrait Gallery; and Vivian Rainer, art critic for the New York Times. We hope you enjoy the session. Thank you.","PeriodicalId":405574,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGGRAPH 89 Panel Proceedings","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computer art - an oxymoron? Views from the mainstream\",\"authors\":\"D. Spencer, H. Rand, K. Huffman, P. Pearlstein, B. Riley, Will Stapp, Vivian Rainer\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/77276.77288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hello. My name is Dorothy Spencer, and this is a special session entitled Computer Art - An Oxymoron? Views from the Mainstream.Before I introduce the panel members I want to tell you two things briefly about the session. First I'm going to tell you what the session does not focus on, and to do that I'm going to read from the SIGGRAPH 89 Show daily that came out this morning. So, for any of you that read it and came here expecting to hear museum curators, gallery owners and artists discuss the evolution of computer art as a means for artistic expression, you can go away now; we're not going to do it.What we are going to do is talk about the fact that computer generated imagery --- although it's been around for several decades, the mainstream art world has been slow to acknowledge it as a viable medium for the creation of fine art. There have been few computer art exhibitions and even fewer reviews. Like photography, is computer art going to take three-quarters of a century before it's accepted into the mainstream?Is it partially the fault of the artist? Are artists too wrapped up in the technological processes to be concerned with the aesthetic results?Does the majority of the artists using the computer not participate in regular juried shows because they feel their work is not understood?Does the technology need to be understood before the work can be judge aesthetically?These are just a few of the questions that we hope to discuss this morning and hopefully we'll have answers for. After each panelist has made his or her presentation, we'll let the panelists respond to each other's remarks before we let you people loose with questions and answers.My first panelist is Harry Rand. He's curator of painting and sculpture at the Museum of American Art in Washington, D.C. He'll be followed by Kathy Huffman, She's the director of the Institute of Contemporary Art, Boston. Followed by Philip Pearlstein, internationally-known artist and former professor of painting at Brooklyn College; Bob Riley, curator of media art, San Francisco Museum of Modern Art; Will Stapp, curator of photography of the National Portrait Gallery; and Vivian Rainer, art critic for the New York Times. We hope you enjoy the session. Thank you.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM SIGGRAPH 89 Panel Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM SIGGRAPH 89 Panel Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/77276.77288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGGRAPH 89 Panel Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/77276.77288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

你好。我是多萝西·斯宾塞,这是一个名为“计算机艺术-矛盾修辞?”主流观点。在我介绍小组成员之前,我想简单地告诉你们关于这次会议的两件事。首先,我要告诉你会议没有关注的是什么,为了做到这一点,我将阅读今天早上发布的SIGGRAPH 89 Show daily。所以,如果你们读了这篇文章,并来到这里希望听到博物馆馆长、画廊老板和艺术家们讨论计算机艺术作为一种艺术表达方式的演变,你们现在可以走开了;我们不会这么做的。我们要做的是谈论计算机生成图像的事实——尽管它已经存在了几十年,但主流艺术界一直很慢地承认它是一种创作美术的可行媒介。很少有计算机艺术展览,评论更少。就像摄影一样,电脑艺术要经过四分之三个世纪才能被主流所接受吗?这部分是艺术家的错吗?艺术家是否过于沉迷于技术过程而忽略了美学结果?大多数使用电脑的艺术家不参加定期的评委会展览,是因为他们觉得自己的作品没有被理解吗?在对作品进行美学评判之前,是否需要先了解技术?这些只是我们希望今天上午讨论的一些问题,希望我们能找到答案。在每个小组成员做了他或她的演讲后,我们将让小组成员相互回应,然后我们让大家自由提问和回答。我的第一位小组成员是哈里·兰德。他是华盛顿美国艺术博物馆的绘画和雕塑策展人。他之后将是凯西·霍夫曼,她是波士顿当代艺术研究所的主任。紧随其后的是国际知名艺术家、前布鲁克林学院绘画教授Philip Pearlstein;鲍勃·莱利,旧金山现代艺术博物馆媒体艺术策展人;国家肖像画廊摄影策展人威尔·斯塔普(Will Stapp);以及《纽约时报》艺术评论家维维安·雷纳。我们希望你喜欢这次会议。谢谢你!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Computer art - an oxymoron? Views from the mainstream
Hello. My name is Dorothy Spencer, and this is a special session entitled Computer Art - An Oxymoron? Views from the Mainstream.Before I introduce the panel members I want to tell you two things briefly about the session. First I'm going to tell you what the session does not focus on, and to do that I'm going to read from the SIGGRAPH 89 Show daily that came out this morning. So, for any of you that read it and came here expecting to hear museum curators, gallery owners and artists discuss the evolution of computer art as a means for artistic expression, you can go away now; we're not going to do it.What we are going to do is talk about the fact that computer generated imagery --- although it's been around for several decades, the mainstream art world has been slow to acknowledge it as a viable medium for the creation of fine art. There have been few computer art exhibitions and even fewer reviews. Like photography, is computer art going to take three-quarters of a century before it's accepted into the mainstream?Is it partially the fault of the artist? Are artists too wrapped up in the technological processes to be concerned with the aesthetic results?Does the majority of the artists using the computer not participate in regular juried shows because they feel their work is not understood?Does the technology need to be understood before the work can be judge aesthetically?These are just a few of the questions that we hope to discuss this morning and hopefully we'll have answers for. After each panelist has made his or her presentation, we'll let the panelists respond to each other's remarks before we let you people loose with questions and answers.My first panelist is Harry Rand. He's curator of painting and sculpture at the Museum of American Art in Washington, D.C. He'll be followed by Kathy Huffman, She's the director of the Institute of Contemporary Art, Boston. Followed by Philip Pearlstein, internationally-known artist and former professor of painting at Brooklyn College; Bob Riley, curator of media art, San Francisco Museum of Modern Art; Will Stapp, curator of photography of the National Portrait Gallery; and Vivian Rainer, art critic for the New York Times. We hope you enjoy the session. Thank you.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Operating systems and graphic user interfaces Physically-based modeling: past, present, and future Distributed graphics: where to draw the lines? HDTV (Hi-Vision) computer graphics Hardware/software solutions for scientfic visualization at large reserach laboratories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1