不公平躲闪有多不公平?

L. Gerin
{"title":"不公平躲闪有多不公平?","authors":"L. Gerin","doi":"10.2478/rmm-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We study a very simple 2-player board game called Dodgem, curiously the game is difficult to analyze when the number of tokens is not the same for the two players. We provide theoretical and experimental elements which indicate which player benefits from the asymmetry of the game.","PeriodicalId":120489,"journal":{"name":"Recreational Mathematics Magazine","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Unfair is the Unfair Dodgem?\",\"authors\":\"L. Gerin\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/rmm-2023-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract We study a very simple 2-player board game called Dodgem, curiously the game is difficult to analyze when the number of tokens is not the same for the two players. We provide theoretical and experimental elements which indicate which player benefits from the asymmetry of the game.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recreational Mathematics Magazine\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recreational Mathematics Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/rmm-2023-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recreational Mathematics Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rmm-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了一个非常简单的双人棋盘游戏Dodgem,奇怪的是,当两个玩家的令牌数量不相同时,游戏很难分析。我们提供理论和实验元素,以表明哪些玩家从游戏的不对称性中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Unfair is the Unfair Dodgem?
Abstract We study a very simple 2-player board game called Dodgem, curiously the game is difficult to analyze when the number of tokens is not the same for the two players. We provide theoretical and experimental elements which indicate which player benefits from the asymmetry of the game.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Go First Dice for Five Players and Beyond. How Unfair is the Unfair Dodgem? How to Read a Clock Economical Dissections Flattening the Curve. . . of Spirographs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1