R S Neiman, K Cain, Y Ben Arieh, D Harrington, R B Mann, B C Wolf
{"title":"合作小组试验中Rappaport分类与工作公式之比较:ECOG经验。","authors":"R S Neiman, K Cain, Y Ben Arieh, D Harrington, R B Mann, B C Wolf","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Working Formulation (WF) for the classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas was shown to be reproducible and clinically relevant in the original study. However, it has not yet been tested by an NCI-supported cooperative clinical oncology group. As a result, the Hematopathology Subcommittee of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) undertook a retrospective study to compare concordance and practical utility between the WF and the Rappaport Classification (RC). Data indicate that with appropriate modifications to minimize unclassifiable lymphomas, the WF can be effectively utilized in cooperative clinical oncology groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":77160,"journal":{"name":"Hematologic pathology","volume":"6 2","pages":"61-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison between the Rappaport Classification and Working Formulation in cooperative group trials: the ECOG experience.\",\"authors\":\"R S Neiman, K Cain, Y Ben Arieh, D Harrington, R B Mann, B C Wolf\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Working Formulation (WF) for the classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas was shown to be reproducible and clinically relevant in the original study. However, it has not yet been tested by an NCI-supported cooperative clinical oncology group. As a result, the Hematopathology Subcommittee of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) undertook a retrospective study to compare concordance and practical utility between the WF and the Rappaport Classification (RC). Data indicate that with appropriate modifications to minimize unclassifiable lymphomas, the WF can be effectively utilized in cooperative clinical oncology groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hematologic pathology\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"61-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hematologic pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hematologic pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparison between the Rappaport Classification and Working Formulation in cooperative group trials: the ECOG experience.
The Working Formulation (WF) for the classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas was shown to be reproducible and clinically relevant in the original study. However, it has not yet been tested by an NCI-supported cooperative clinical oncology group. As a result, the Hematopathology Subcommittee of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) undertook a retrospective study to compare concordance and practical utility between the WF and the Rappaport Classification (RC). Data indicate that with appropriate modifications to minimize unclassifiable lymphomas, the WF can be effectively utilized in cooperative clinical oncology groups.
分享
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
