{"title":"在非侵入性小脑刺激过程中寻找小叶特异性电场分布的计算管道","authors":"Z. Rezaee, Brandon Ruszala, Anirban Dutta","doi":"10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Cerebellar Transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) of cerebellar lobules is challenging due to the complexity of the cerebellar structure. Therefore, we present a freely available computational pipeline to determine the subject-specific lobule-specific electric field distribution during ctDCS. Methods: The computational pipeline isolates subject-specific cerebellar lobules based on a spatially unbiased atlas template (SUIT) for the cerebellum, and then calculates the lobule-specific electric field distribution during ctDCS. The computational pipeline was tested using Colin27 Average Brain. The 5 cm × 5 cm anode was placed 3 cm lateral to inion, and the same sized cathode was placed on the contralateral supra-orbital area (called Manto montage) and buccinators muscle (called Celnik montage). A published 4x1 HD-ctDCS electrode montage was also implemented for a comparison using analysis of variance. Results: The electric field strength of both the Celnik and the Manto montages affected the lobules Crus II, VIIb, VIII, and IX of the targeted cerebellar hemispheres while Manto montage had a more bilateral effect. The HD-ctDCS montage primarily affected the lobules Crus I, Crus II, VIIb of the targeted cerebellar hemisphere. Discussion: Our freely available subject-specific computational modeling pipeline can be used to analyze lobulespecific electric field distribution to select an optimal ctDCS electrode montage.","PeriodicalId":130415,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR)","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A computational pipeline to find lobule-specific electric field distribution during non-invasive cerebellar stimulation\",\"authors\":\"Z. Rezaee, Brandon Ruszala, Anirban Dutta\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Cerebellar Transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) of cerebellar lobules is challenging due to the complexity of the cerebellar structure. Therefore, we present a freely available computational pipeline to determine the subject-specific lobule-specific electric field distribution during ctDCS. Methods: The computational pipeline isolates subject-specific cerebellar lobules based on a spatially unbiased atlas template (SUIT) for the cerebellum, and then calculates the lobule-specific electric field distribution during ctDCS. The computational pipeline was tested using Colin27 Average Brain. The 5 cm × 5 cm anode was placed 3 cm lateral to inion, and the same sized cathode was placed on the contralateral supra-orbital area (called Manto montage) and buccinators muscle (called Celnik montage). A published 4x1 HD-ctDCS electrode montage was also implemented for a comparison using analysis of variance. Results: The electric field strength of both the Celnik and the Manto montages affected the lobules Crus II, VIIb, VIII, and IX of the targeted cerebellar hemispheres while Manto montage had a more bilateral effect. The HD-ctDCS montage primarily affected the lobules Crus I, Crus II, VIIb of the targeted cerebellar hemisphere. Discussion: Our freely available subject-specific computational modeling pipeline can be used to analyze lobulespecific electric field distribution to select an optimal ctDCS electrode montage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR)\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779453\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
摘要
目的:小脑经颅直流电刺激(ctDCS)由于小脑结构的复杂性而具有挑战性。因此,我们提出了一个免费的计算管道来确定ctDCS期间特定主题的小叶特定电场分布。方法:基于空间无偏图谱模板(spatial unbiased atlas template, SUIT),计算流水线分离受试者特异性小脑小叶,计算ctDCS过程中小脑特异性电场分布。计算管道使用Colin27 Average Brain进行测试。5cm × 5cm的阳极放置在距轴侧3cm处,同样大小的阴极放置在对侧眶上区域(称为Manto蒙太奇)和扣肌(称为Celnik蒙太奇)上。还使用已发表的4x1 HD-ctDCS电极蒙太奇进行方差分析比较。结果:Celnik和Manto蒙太奇的电场强度均影响目标小脑半球的Crus II, vib, VIII和IX小叶,而Manto蒙太奇具有更多的双边作用。HD-ctDCS蒙太奇主要影响目标小脑半球的Crus I, Crus II, vib小叶。讨论:我们免费提供的特定主题的计算建模管道可用于分析特定区域的电场分布,以选择最佳的ctDCS电极蒙太奇。
A computational pipeline to find lobule-specific electric field distribution during non-invasive cerebellar stimulation
Objective: Cerebellar Transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) of cerebellar lobules is challenging due to the complexity of the cerebellar structure. Therefore, we present a freely available computational pipeline to determine the subject-specific lobule-specific electric field distribution during ctDCS. Methods: The computational pipeline isolates subject-specific cerebellar lobules based on a spatially unbiased atlas template (SUIT) for the cerebellum, and then calculates the lobule-specific electric field distribution during ctDCS. The computational pipeline was tested using Colin27 Average Brain. The 5 cm × 5 cm anode was placed 3 cm lateral to inion, and the same sized cathode was placed on the contralateral supra-orbital area (called Manto montage) and buccinators muscle (called Celnik montage). A published 4x1 HD-ctDCS electrode montage was also implemented for a comparison using analysis of variance. Results: The electric field strength of both the Celnik and the Manto montages affected the lobules Crus II, VIIb, VIII, and IX of the targeted cerebellar hemispheres while Manto montage had a more bilateral effect. The HD-ctDCS montage primarily affected the lobules Crus I, Crus II, VIIb of the targeted cerebellar hemisphere. Discussion: Our freely available subject-specific computational modeling pipeline can be used to analyze lobulespecific electric field distribution to select an optimal ctDCS electrode montage.