{"title":"紧凑型热交换器半圆形集管爆裂压力和应变验证","authors":"B. Lance, M. Carlson","doi":"10.1115/gt2019-91772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Compact heat exchangers for supercritical CO2 (sCO2) service are often designed with external, semi-circular headers. Their design is governed by the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) whose equations were typically derived by following Castigliano’s Theorems. However, there are no known validation experiments to support their claims of pressure rating or burst pressure predictions nor is there much information about how and where failures occur.\n This work includes high pressure bursting of three semi-circular header prototypes for the validation of three aspects: (1) burst pressure predictions from the BPVC, (2) strain predictions from Finite Element Analysis (FEA), and (3) deformation from FEA. The header prototypes were designed with geometry and weld specifications from the BPVC Section VIII Division 1, a design pressure typical of sCO2 service of 3,900 psi (26.9 MPa), and were built with 316 SS. Repeating the test in triplicate allows for greater confidence in the experimental results and enables data averaging. Burst pressure predictions are compared with experimental results for accuracy assessment. The prototypes are analyzed to understand their failure mechanism and locations.\n Experimental strain and deformation measurements were obtained optically with Digital Image Correlation (DIC). This technique allows strain to be measured in two dimensions and even allows for deformation measurements, all without contacting the prototype. Eight cameras are used for full coverage of both headers on the prototypes. The rich data from this technique are an excellent validation source for FEA strain and deformation predictions. Experimental data and simulation predictions are compared to assess simulation accuracy.","PeriodicalId":412490,"journal":{"name":"Volume 9: Oil and Gas Applications; Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles; Wind Energy","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compact Heat Exchanger Semi-Circular Header Burst Pressure and Strain Validation\",\"authors\":\"B. Lance, M. Carlson\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/gt2019-91772\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Compact heat exchangers for supercritical CO2 (sCO2) service are often designed with external, semi-circular headers. Their design is governed by the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) whose equations were typically derived by following Castigliano’s Theorems. However, there are no known validation experiments to support their claims of pressure rating or burst pressure predictions nor is there much information about how and where failures occur.\\n This work includes high pressure bursting of three semi-circular header prototypes for the validation of three aspects: (1) burst pressure predictions from the BPVC, (2) strain predictions from Finite Element Analysis (FEA), and (3) deformation from FEA. The header prototypes were designed with geometry and weld specifications from the BPVC Section VIII Division 1, a design pressure typical of sCO2 service of 3,900 psi (26.9 MPa), and were built with 316 SS. Repeating the test in triplicate allows for greater confidence in the experimental results and enables data averaging. Burst pressure predictions are compared with experimental results for accuracy assessment. The prototypes are analyzed to understand their failure mechanism and locations.\\n Experimental strain and deformation measurements were obtained optically with Digital Image Correlation (DIC). This technique allows strain to be measured in two dimensions and even allows for deformation measurements, all without contacting the prototype. Eight cameras are used for full coverage of both headers on the prototypes. The rich data from this technique are an excellent validation source for FEA strain and deformation predictions. Experimental data and simulation predictions are compared to assess simulation accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":412490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 9: Oil and Gas Applications; Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles; Wind Energy\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 9: Oil and Gas Applications; Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles; Wind Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2019-91772\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 9: Oil and Gas Applications; Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles; Wind Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2019-91772","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
用于超临界CO2 (sCO2)应用的紧凑型热交换器通常设计为外部半圆形集管。它们的设计遵循ASME锅炉和压力容器规范(BPVC),其方程通常由Castigliano定理推导。然而,没有已知的验证实验来支持他们的压力等级或破裂压力预测,也没有太多关于故障发生的方式和位置的信息。这项工作包括对三个半圆封头原型进行高压爆破,以验证三个方面:(1)BPVC的爆破压力预测,(2)有限元分析(FEA)的应变预测,(3)有限元分析的变形。首管原型设计符合BPVC Section VIII Division 1的几何形状和焊接规范,设计压力为sCO2服务的典型设计压力为3900 psi (26.9 MPa),使用316 SS制造。重复三次测试可以提高实验结果的可信度,并实现数据平均。爆破压力预测结果与实验结果进行了比较,以评估其准确性。对原型进行了分析,以了解其失效机理和位置。实验应变和变形测量是通过数字图像相关(DIC)光学获得的。这种技术可以测量二维应变,甚至可以测量变形,所有这些都不需要接触原型。8个摄像头用于在原型上完全覆盖两个头。该技术的丰富数据是有限元应变和变形预测的良好验证来源。实验数据和模拟预测进行比较,以评估模拟精度。
Compact Heat Exchanger Semi-Circular Header Burst Pressure and Strain Validation
Compact heat exchangers for supercritical CO2 (sCO2) service are often designed with external, semi-circular headers. Their design is governed by the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC) whose equations were typically derived by following Castigliano’s Theorems. However, there are no known validation experiments to support their claims of pressure rating or burst pressure predictions nor is there much information about how and where failures occur.
This work includes high pressure bursting of three semi-circular header prototypes for the validation of three aspects: (1) burst pressure predictions from the BPVC, (2) strain predictions from Finite Element Analysis (FEA), and (3) deformation from FEA. The header prototypes were designed with geometry and weld specifications from the BPVC Section VIII Division 1, a design pressure typical of sCO2 service of 3,900 psi (26.9 MPa), and were built with 316 SS. Repeating the test in triplicate allows for greater confidence in the experimental results and enables data averaging. Burst pressure predictions are compared with experimental results for accuracy assessment. The prototypes are analyzed to understand their failure mechanism and locations.
Experimental strain and deformation measurements were obtained optically with Digital Image Correlation (DIC). This technique allows strain to be measured in two dimensions and even allows for deformation measurements, all without contacting the prototype. Eight cameras are used for full coverage of both headers on the prototypes. The rich data from this technique are an excellent validation source for FEA strain and deformation predictions. Experimental data and simulation predictions are compared to assess simulation accuracy.