Carol S. Smidts, B. Cukic, Erdogan Gunel, M. Li, Harshinder Singh
{"title":"软件可靠性确证","authors":"Carol S. Smidts, B. Cukic, Erdogan Gunel, M. Li, Harshinder Singh","doi":"10.1109/SEW.2002.1199453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We suggest that subjective reliability estimation from the development lifecycle, based on observed behavior or the reflection of one's belief in the system quality, be included in certification. In statistical terms, we hypothesize that a system failure occurs with the estimated probability. Presumed reliability needs to be corroborated by statistical testing during the reliability certification phase. As evidence relevant to the hypothesis increases, we change the degree of belief in the hypothesis. Depending on the corroboration evidence, the system is either certified or rejected. The advantage of the proposed theory is an economically acceptable number of required system certification tests, even for high assurance systems so far considered impossible to certify.","PeriodicalId":146269,"journal":{"name":"27th Annual NASA Goddard/IEEE Software Engineering Workshop, 2002. Proceedings.","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Software reliability corroboration\",\"authors\":\"Carol S. Smidts, B. Cukic, Erdogan Gunel, M. Li, Harshinder Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEW.2002.1199453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We suggest that subjective reliability estimation from the development lifecycle, based on observed behavior or the reflection of one's belief in the system quality, be included in certification. In statistical terms, we hypothesize that a system failure occurs with the estimated probability. Presumed reliability needs to be corroborated by statistical testing during the reliability certification phase. As evidence relevant to the hypothesis increases, we change the degree of belief in the hypothesis. Depending on the corroboration evidence, the system is either certified or rejected. The advantage of the proposed theory is an economically acceptable number of required system certification tests, even for high assurance systems so far considered impossible to certify.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"27th Annual NASA Goddard/IEEE Software Engineering Workshop, 2002. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"27th Annual NASA Goddard/IEEE Software Engineering Workshop, 2002. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEW.2002.1199453\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"27th Annual NASA Goddard/IEEE Software Engineering Workshop, 2002. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEW.2002.1199453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We suggest that subjective reliability estimation from the development lifecycle, based on observed behavior or the reflection of one's belief in the system quality, be included in certification. In statistical terms, we hypothesize that a system failure occurs with the estimated probability. Presumed reliability needs to be corroborated by statistical testing during the reliability certification phase. As evidence relevant to the hypothesis increases, we change the degree of belief in the hypothesis. Depending on the corroboration evidence, the system is either certified or rejected. The advantage of the proposed theory is an economically acceptable number of required system certification tests, even for high assurance systems so far considered impossible to certify.