合作写作的意义:基于学生经验的视角

Yulhenli Thabran, Dony Efriza, Reny Heryanti
{"title":"合作写作的意义:基于学生经验的视角","authors":"Yulhenli Thabran, Dony Efriza, Reny Heryanti","doi":"10.30998/SCOPE.V5I2.8549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study examines four pairs or eight students who wrote their creative writing assignments collaboratively. As opposed to the popular view, which stated that writing is one of the most difficult subjects to learn for EFL students, many studies have reported that collaborative writing (henceforth CW) is regarded as a technique that can improve students’ productive writing skills to a great extent. The researchers would like to see how effective CW was for the students who did their writing assignments with their pairs by employing a qualitative case study to examine the eight students’ experiences in writing their essays and fictional stories. The researchers wanted to know why some students could adapt to this learning model, and others faced some problems or failed to achieve the target of learning outcomes. Opened-ended questionnaire and in-depth interviews are used to elicit data from the students. The first pair was the most successful example of partnership in writing since they opened themselves for critiques and suggestions. In contrast, the second pair had some problems that disturbed their collaboration as they did not seem to open themselves for critiques and suggestions. The third pair failed to do an effective partnership because they could not solve problems that blocked their cooperation right from the beginning. The fourth pair found their way for an effective collaboration when they opened themselves for critiques and suggestions. The success or failure in the partnership heavily depends on each student collaborator's willingness to open themselves for criticism and suggestion.","PeriodicalId":149821,"journal":{"name":"Journal on English Language Teaching","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making Sense of Collaborative Writing: A Student-Experience-Based Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Yulhenli Thabran, Dony Efriza, Reny Heryanti\",\"doi\":\"10.30998/SCOPE.V5I2.8549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study examines four pairs or eight students who wrote their creative writing assignments collaboratively. As opposed to the popular view, which stated that writing is one of the most difficult subjects to learn for EFL students, many studies have reported that collaborative writing (henceforth CW) is regarded as a technique that can improve students’ productive writing skills to a great extent. The researchers would like to see how effective CW was for the students who did their writing assignments with their pairs by employing a qualitative case study to examine the eight students’ experiences in writing their essays and fictional stories. The researchers wanted to know why some students could adapt to this learning model, and others faced some problems or failed to achieve the target of learning outcomes. Opened-ended questionnaire and in-depth interviews are used to elicit data from the students. The first pair was the most successful example of partnership in writing since they opened themselves for critiques and suggestions. In contrast, the second pair had some problems that disturbed their collaboration as they did not seem to open themselves for critiques and suggestions. The third pair failed to do an effective partnership because they could not solve problems that blocked their cooperation right from the beginning. The fourth pair found their way for an effective collaboration when they opened themselves for critiques and suggestions. The success or failure in the partnership heavily depends on each student collaborator's willingness to open themselves for criticism and suggestion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal on English Language Teaching\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal on English Language Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30998/SCOPE.V5I2.8549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30998/SCOPE.V5I2.8549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了四对或八名合作完成创意写作作业的学生。与普遍认为写作是英语学生最难学习的科目之一的观点相反,许多研究报告称,协作写作(以下简称CW)被认为是一种可以在很大程度上提高学生高效写作技能的技巧。研究人员希望通过采用定性案例研究来检查8名学生在撰写论文和虚构故事时的经历,看看CW对与他们一起完成写作任务的学生有多有效。研究人员想知道为什么有些学生能够适应这种学习模式,而另一些学生则面临一些问题或未能达到学习成果的目标。采用开放式问卷和深度访谈的方式从学生中获取数据。第一对是合作写作最成功的例子,因为他们敞开心扉接受批评和建议。相比之下,第二对搭档有一些问题,他们似乎不愿意接受批评和建议,这干扰了他们的合作。第三对夫妇之所以不能有效地合作,是因为他们无法解决从一开始就阻碍他们合作的问题。第四组人在敞开心扉接受批评和建议时,找到了有效合作的方式。合作关系的成败很大程度上取决于每个学生合作者是否愿意敞开心扉接受批评和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making Sense of Collaborative Writing: A Student-Experience-Based Perspective
The present study examines four pairs or eight students who wrote their creative writing assignments collaboratively. As opposed to the popular view, which stated that writing is one of the most difficult subjects to learn for EFL students, many studies have reported that collaborative writing (henceforth CW) is regarded as a technique that can improve students’ productive writing skills to a great extent. The researchers would like to see how effective CW was for the students who did their writing assignments with their pairs by employing a qualitative case study to examine the eight students’ experiences in writing their essays and fictional stories. The researchers wanted to know why some students could adapt to this learning model, and others faced some problems or failed to achieve the target of learning outcomes. Opened-ended questionnaire and in-depth interviews are used to elicit data from the students. The first pair was the most successful example of partnership in writing since they opened themselves for critiques and suggestions. In contrast, the second pair had some problems that disturbed their collaboration as they did not seem to open themselves for critiques and suggestions. The third pair failed to do an effective partnership because they could not solve problems that blocked their cooperation right from the beginning. The fourth pair found their way for an effective collaboration when they opened themselves for critiques and suggestions. The success or failure in the partnership heavily depends on each student collaborator's willingness to open themselves for criticism and suggestion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY TO THE ACQUISITION OF ENGLISH WORD TIERS BY INDONESIAN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS Politeness principle of assertive act in debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden THE INCORPORATION OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY TOOLS IN THE PRE-SERVICE LEARNING ACTIVITIES IN A TEACHER’S LESSON PLAN INDONESIAN UNIVERSITY STUDENT'S EMOTIONAL EXPERIENCES OF LEARNING VOCABULARY THROUGH ENGLISH LEARNING ACCOUNTS ON INSTAGRAM THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ONLINE INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEOS IN TEACHING STUDENT SPEAKING SKILL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1