同构多处理器上列表调度算法的比较分析

Jian Wang, Xinke Lv, Xiao Chen
{"title":"同构多处理器上列表调度算法的比较分析","authors":"Jian Wang, Xinke Lv, Xiao Chen","doi":"10.1109/ICCSN.2016.7586616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Task Scheduling for parallel computing is a process to map the application to the multi-processors while minimize the execution time. Task scheduling is classified into static scheduling and dynamic scheduling. List scheduling is a class of static heuristic based scheduling algorithms with low complexity and good performance. Based on the principle of list scheduling algorithm with limited numbers of homogeneous multi-processors, this study analyzes the complexity and property of six typical kinds of list scheduling algorithms including HLFET, ISH, MCP, ETF, DLS and CPND. By using three types of task graphs including peer set graphs, traced graphs and random graphs, the schedule lengths of the six list scheduling algorithms are compared and analyzed. It can be concluded that the algorithms based on the critical path nodes (such as MCP, CPND) are generally better than other algorithms. The algorithms using dynamic properties (such as DLS, ETF) perform better than most of the algorithms adopting static properties.","PeriodicalId":158877,"journal":{"name":"2016 8th IEEE International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of list scheduling algorithms on homogeneous multi-processors\",\"authors\":\"Jian Wang, Xinke Lv, Xiao Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCSN.2016.7586616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Task Scheduling for parallel computing is a process to map the application to the multi-processors while minimize the execution time. Task scheduling is classified into static scheduling and dynamic scheduling. List scheduling is a class of static heuristic based scheduling algorithms with low complexity and good performance. Based on the principle of list scheduling algorithm with limited numbers of homogeneous multi-processors, this study analyzes the complexity and property of six typical kinds of list scheduling algorithms including HLFET, ISH, MCP, ETF, DLS and CPND. By using three types of task graphs including peer set graphs, traced graphs and random graphs, the schedule lengths of the six list scheduling algorithms are compared and analyzed. It can be concluded that the algorithms based on the critical path nodes (such as MCP, CPND) are generally better than other algorithms. The algorithms using dynamic properties (such as DLS, ETF) perform better than most of the algorithms adopting static properties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 8th IEEE International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 8th IEEE International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSN.2016.7586616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 8th IEEE International Conference on Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSN.2016.7586616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

并行计算的任务调度是将应用程序映射到多处理器,同时最小化执行时间的过程。任务调度分为静态调度和动态调度。列表调度是一类基于静态启发式的调度算法,复杂度低,性能好。基于同构多处理器数量有限的列表调度算法原理,分析了HLFET、ISH、MCP、ETF、DLS和CPND等6种典型列表调度算法的复杂度和特性。利用同伴集图、跟踪图和随机图三种任务图,对六种列表调度算法的调度长度进行了比较和分析。可以得出结论,基于关键路径节点的算法(如MCP、CPND)一般优于其他算法。使用动态属性的算法(如DLS、ETF)比大多数采用静态属性的算法性能更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of list scheduling algorithms on homogeneous multi-processors
Task Scheduling for parallel computing is a process to map the application to the multi-processors while minimize the execution time. Task scheduling is classified into static scheduling and dynamic scheduling. List scheduling is a class of static heuristic based scheduling algorithms with low complexity and good performance. Based on the principle of list scheduling algorithm with limited numbers of homogeneous multi-processors, this study analyzes the complexity and property of six typical kinds of list scheduling algorithms including HLFET, ISH, MCP, ETF, DLS and CPND. By using three types of task graphs including peer set graphs, traced graphs and random graphs, the schedule lengths of the six list scheduling algorithms are compared and analyzed. It can be concluded that the algorithms based on the critical path nodes (such as MCP, CPND) are generally better than other algorithms. The algorithms using dynamic properties (such as DLS, ETF) perform better than most of the algorithms adopting static properties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Detecting sports fatigue from speech by support vector machine Error beacon filtering algorithm based on K-means clustering for underwater Wireless Sensor Networks Transmit beamforming optimization for energy efficiency maximization in downlink distributed antenna systems Research of 3D face recognition algorithm based on deep learning stacked denoising autoencoder theory Improved propagator method for joint angle and Doppler estimation based on structured least squares
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1