{"title":"正确的信仰是知识吗?","authors":"Edmund L. Gettier","doi":"10.1093/ANALYS/23.6.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Edmund Gettier is Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. This short piece, published in 1963, seemed to many decisively to refute an otherwise attractive analysis of knowledge. It stimulated a renewed effort, still ongoing, to clarify exactly what knowledge comprises. ____________________ From Analysis. vol. 23 (] 966). Copyright @ by Edmund Gettier. Reprinted by permission of the author.","PeriodicalId":104597,"journal":{"name":"Arguing About Knowledge","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1963-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1278","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?\",\"authors\":\"Edmund L. Gettier\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ANALYS/23.6.121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Edmund Gettier is Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. This short piece, published in 1963, seemed to many decisively to refute an otherwise attractive analysis of knowledge. It stimulated a renewed effort, still ongoing, to clarify exactly what knowledge comprises. ____________________ From Analysis. vol. 23 (] 966). Copyright @ by Edmund Gettier. Reprinted by permission of the author.\",\"PeriodicalId\":104597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arguing About Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1963-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1278\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arguing About Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ANALYS/23.6.121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arguing About Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ANALYS/23.6.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Edmund Gettier is Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. This short piece, published in 1963, seemed to many decisively to refute an otherwise attractive analysis of knowledge. It stimulated a renewed effort, still ongoing, to clarify exactly what knowledge comprises. ____________________ From Analysis. vol. 23 (] 966). Copyright @ by Edmund Gettier. Reprinted by permission of the author.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
