两类不等精度数据的卫星共视比较

Chen Ruiqiong, Yang Ying, L. Ya, L. Xiaohui, Xue Yanrong
{"title":"两类不等精度数据的卫星共视比较","authors":"Chen Ruiqiong, Yang Ying, L. Ya, L. Xiaohui, Xue Yanrong","doi":"10.1109/ICEMI.2017.8265814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pseudorange and carrier phase are two basic measurements of the GNSS receiver, both of them are different and complementary, The accuracy of pseudorange from a few meters to a few decimeters, which are frequently used in the low precision of the common-view comparison, it has the advantages of high speed and simple data processing. The carrier phase observation value actually represents the phase difference between the reference signals generated by the receiver. It is a carrier signal with Doppler shift and its accuracy is up to millimeter, It is often used in the high-accuracy of common-view comparison. But it exists the ambiguity uncertain problem, greatly increasing the difficulty of data processing. In this paper, two kinds of precision measurement methods are presented. one is direct using pseudorange observation value to common-view comparison, and the other is using the carrier phase value to smooth the pseudo-range observation value. After relevant experiments analysis, using the original pseudorange measurements, the standard deviation of the difference is 1.0 m, and the standard deviation of the difference is 0.46 m after the carrier phase to smooth the pseudo-range observation value, and the result comparison is improved obviously. Finally, in the experiment of short baseline, using original pseudorange the standard deviation of the common-view comparison is 1.90 ns and using the carrier phase smoothing pseudorange is 1.18 ns, It is show that the uncertainty of carrier phase smoothing pseudorange measurement is better than that of pseudorange method.","PeriodicalId":275568,"journal":{"name":"2017 13th IEEE International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments (ICEMI)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Satellite common-view comparison of two types of unequal precision data\",\"authors\":\"Chen Ruiqiong, Yang Ying, L. Ya, L. Xiaohui, Xue Yanrong\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICEMI.2017.8265814\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The pseudorange and carrier phase are two basic measurements of the GNSS receiver, both of them are different and complementary, The accuracy of pseudorange from a few meters to a few decimeters, which are frequently used in the low precision of the common-view comparison, it has the advantages of high speed and simple data processing. The carrier phase observation value actually represents the phase difference between the reference signals generated by the receiver. It is a carrier signal with Doppler shift and its accuracy is up to millimeter, It is often used in the high-accuracy of common-view comparison. But it exists the ambiguity uncertain problem, greatly increasing the difficulty of data processing. In this paper, two kinds of precision measurement methods are presented. one is direct using pseudorange observation value to common-view comparison, and the other is using the carrier phase value to smooth the pseudo-range observation value. After relevant experiments analysis, using the original pseudorange measurements, the standard deviation of the difference is 1.0 m, and the standard deviation of the difference is 0.46 m after the carrier phase to smooth the pseudo-range observation value, and the result comparison is improved obviously. Finally, in the experiment of short baseline, using original pseudorange the standard deviation of the common-view comparison is 1.90 ns and using the carrier phase smoothing pseudorange is 1.18 ns, It is show that the uncertainty of carrier phase smoothing pseudorange measurement is better than that of pseudorange method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 13th IEEE International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments (ICEMI)\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 13th IEEE International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments (ICEMI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEMI.2017.8265814\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 13th IEEE International Conference on Electronic Measurement & Instruments (ICEMI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEMI.2017.8265814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

伪距和载波相位是GNSS接收机的两种基本测量,两者既有区别又有互补,伪距的精度从几米到几分米不等,在精度较低的普通视点比较中经常使用,它具有速度快、数据处理简单的优点。载波相位观测值实际上表示接收机产生的参考信号之间的相位差。它是一种具有多普勒频移的载波信号,精度可达毫米级,常用于高精度的共视比较。但它存在歧义不确定问题,大大增加了数据处理的难度。本文介绍了两种精密测量方法。一种是直接使用伪距离观测值进行共视比较,另一种是使用载波相位值对伪距离观测值进行平滑处理。经过相关实验分析,利用原始伪距测量值,差值的标准差为1.0 m,经过载波相位对伪距观测值进行平滑处理后,差值的标准差为0.46 m,结果对比有明显改善。最后,在短基线实验中,采用原始伪距测量共视比较的标准差为1.90 ns,采用载波相位平滑伪距测量的标准差为1.18 ns,表明载波相位平滑伪距测量的不确定度优于伪距测量方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Satellite common-view comparison of two types of unequal precision data
The pseudorange and carrier phase are two basic measurements of the GNSS receiver, both of them are different and complementary, The accuracy of pseudorange from a few meters to a few decimeters, which are frequently used in the low precision of the common-view comparison, it has the advantages of high speed and simple data processing. The carrier phase observation value actually represents the phase difference between the reference signals generated by the receiver. It is a carrier signal with Doppler shift and its accuracy is up to millimeter, It is often used in the high-accuracy of common-view comparison. But it exists the ambiguity uncertain problem, greatly increasing the difficulty of data processing. In this paper, two kinds of precision measurement methods are presented. one is direct using pseudorange observation value to common-view comparison, and the other is using the carrier phase value to smooth the pseudo-range observation value. After relevant experiments analysis, using the original pseudorange measurements, the standard deviation of the difference is 1.0 m, and the standard deviation of the difference is 0.46 m after the carrier phase to smooth the pseudo-range observation value, and the result comparison is improved obviously. Finally, in the experiment of short baseline, using original pseudorange the standard deviation of the common-view comparison is 1.90 ns and using the carrier phase smoothing pseudorange is 1.18 ns, It is show that the uncertainty of carrier phase smoothing pseudorange measurement is better than that of pseudorange method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Novel algorithm of channel estimation for CP-OFDM systems with pilot symbols in frequency domain Power spectral density estimation from random interleaved samples Application of adaptive median filter and wavelet transform to dongba manuscript images denoising Atomic clock frequency difference prediction algorithm based on genetic wavelet neural network Particle velocity measurement using linear capacitive sensor matrix
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1