活力和内脏

Deborah Lupton
{"title":"活力和内脏","authors":"Deborah Lupton","doi":"10.4324/9780203733080-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter addresses the use of social media platforms and digital visual media (selfies, hashtags, videos, GIFs and memes) in micro-political and macro-political engagements related to food and embodiment. The analysis has its theoretical foundation in feminist material perspectives, particularly the scholarship of Haraway, Barad, Bennett and Braidotti. I identify the agentive capacities, affects and vitalities generated in and through the body/food assemblages configured in these new media. These do not all work in progressive political ways, however. Digital media body/food assemblages tend to represent idealised bodies as those that are highly contained and controlled, privileging disciplined, ‘clean’ and healthy eating, ethical food choices, and lean, physically fit bodies. Uncontained, out-of-control bodies and appetites, and choices such as meat-eating, are typically positioned as disgusting, repellent and morally and ethically inferior. This mode of representation is taken to its extreme in pro-anorexia and vegetarian/vegan social media engagements. At the same time, however, many digital media assemblages acknowledge and celebrate the carnivalesque and transgressive power of carnal and visceral appetites, often as a direct political resistance to ideals of fleshly and sensual containment. These portrayals are sometimes underpinned with disturbing gendered representations, in which men are depicted as aggressive meat eaters and animals and women as objects for men’s carnal appetites.","PeriodicalId":288012,"journal":{"name":"Alternative Food Politics","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vitalities and visceralities\",\"authors\":\"Deborah Lupton\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780203733080-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter addresses the use of social media platforms and digital visual media (selfies, hashtags, videos, GIFs and memes) in micro-political and macro-political engagements related to food and embodiment. The analysis has its theoretical foundation in feminist material perspectives, particularly the scholarship of Haraway, Barad, Bennett and Braidotti. I identify the agentive capacities, affects and vitalities generated in and through the body/food assemblages configured in these new media. These do not all work in progressive political ways, however. Digital media body/food assemblages tend to represent idealised bodies as those that are highly contained and controlled, privileging disciplined, ‘clean’ and healthy eating, ethical food choices, and lean, physically fit bodies. Uncontained, out-of-control bodies and appetites, and choices such as meat-eating, are typically positioned as disgusting, repellent and morally and ethically inferior. This mode of representation is taken to its extreme in pro-anorexia and vegetarian/vegan social media engagements. At the same time, however, many digital media assemblages acknowledge and celebrate the carnivalesque and transgressive power of carnal and visceral appetites, often as a direct political resistance to ideals of fleshly and sensual containment. These portrayals are sometimes underpinned with disturbing gendered representations, in which men are depicted as aggressive meat eaters and animals and women as objects for men’s carnal appetites.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternative Food Politics\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternative Food Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203733080-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative Food Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203733080-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本章讨论了社交媒体平台和数字视觉媒体(自拍照、标签、视频、动图和表情包)在与食物和化身相关的微观政治和宏观政治参与中的使用。这一分析的理论基础是女性主义材料视角,特别是哈拉威、巴拉德、贝内特和布雷多蒂等人的研究。我确定了在这些新媒体中配置的身体/食物组合中产生的代理能力、影响和活力。然而,并非所有这些都能以进步的政治方式发挥作用。数字媒体的身体/食物组合倾向于代表那些高度控制和控制的理想身体,优先考虑纪律,“干净”和健康的饮食,道德的食物选择,以及苗条,身体健康的身体。不受控制、失控的身体和食欲,以及吃肉等选择,通常被定位为令人厌恶、令人反感、道德和伦理低下。这种表现模式在支持厌食症和素食者/纯素食者的社交媒体活动中发挥到了极致。然而,与此同时,许多数字媒体集合承认并颂扬肉体和本能欲望的狂欢和越界力量,这往往是对肉体和感官遏制理想的直接政治抵制。这些描绘有时会以令人不安的性别表现为基础,在这些表现中,男性被描绘成好斗的肉食者和动物,女性被描绘成男性肉欲的对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vitalities and visceralities
This chapter addresses the use of social media platforms and digital visual media (selfies, hashtags, videos, GIFs and memes) in micro-political and macro-political engagements related to food and embodiment. The analysis has its theoretical foundation in feminist material perspectives, particularly the scholarship of Haraway, Barad, Bennett and Braidotti. I identify the agentive capacities, affects and vitalities generated in and through the body/food assemblages configured in these new media. These do not all work in progressive political ways, however. Digital media body/food assemblages tend to represent idealised bodies as those that are highly contained and controlled, privileging disciplined, ‘clean’ and healthy eating, ethical food choices, and lean, physically fit bodies. Uncontained, out-of-control bodies and appetites, and choices such as meat-eating, are typically positioned as disgusting, repellent and morally and ethically inferior. This mode of representation is taken to its extreme in pro-anorexia and vegetarian/vegan social media engagements. At the same time, however, many digital media assemblages acknowledge and celebrate the carnivalesque and transgressive power of carnal and visceral appetites, often as a direct political resistance to ideals of fleshly and sensual containment. These portrayals are sometimes underpinned with disturbing gendered representations, in which men are depicted as aggressive meat eaters and animals and women as objects for men’s carnal appetites.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
It’s not (just) about the f-ckin’ animals Food sovereignty Promising sustainable foods The Welcome Dinner Project Mainstreaming New Nordic Cuisine?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1