达旦和利哈扬,一个王国还是两个王国:通过考古证据的批判性研究

Abdulrahman Abdulaziz Alsuhaibani
{"title":"达旦和利哈扬,一个王国还是两个王国:通过考古证据的批判性研究","authors":"Abdulrahman Abdulaziz Alsuhaibani","doi":"10.35516/jjha.v17i1.958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The kingdoms of Dadan and Lihyan are among the most prominent ancient Arab kingdoms that arose in northwestern Arabia during the first millennium BC, specifically in al-‘Ula, considered to the capital of these two kingdoms. Interest in those kingdoms has increased significantly since the beginning of this millennium, when fieldwork started in al-‘Ula, specifically in sites such as Dadan, Umm Daraj, Tell Al-Kuthib and others. Despite this increase in interest, two prominent issues about the relationship between Dadan and Lihyan are the confusion regarding whether they were two separate kingdoms or one kingdom with different names, and the origin of the Dadanites and Lihyanites. This article examines these issues through the analysis of the available archaeological evidence.","PeriodicalId":370991,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Journal for History and Archaeology","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dadan and Lihyan, a Kingdom or Two Kingdoms: A Critical Study through Archaeological Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Abdulrahman Abdulaziz Alsuhaibani\",\"doi\":\"10.35516/jjha.v17i1.958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The kingdoms of Dadan and Lihyan are among the most prominent ancient Arab kingdoms that arose in northwestern Arabia during the first millennium BC, specifically in al-‘Ula, considered to the capital of these two kingdoms. Interest in those kingdoms has increased significantly since the beginning of this millennium, when fieldwork started in al-‘Ula, specifically in sites such as Dadan, Umm Daraj, Tell Al-Kuthib and others. Despite this increase in interest, two prominent issues about the relationship between Dadan and Lihyan are the confusion regarding whether they were two separate kingdoms or one kingdom with different names, and the origin of the Dadanites and Lihyanites. This article examines these issues through the analysis of the available archaeological evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jordan Journal for History and Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jordan Journal for History and Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35516/jjha.v17i1.958\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Journal for History and Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jjha.v17i1.958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

达丹王国和利哈扬王国是公元前一千年在阿拉伯西北部兴起的最著名的古代阿拉伯王国之一,特别是在被认为是这两个王国的首都的乌拉。自本世纪初以来,人们对这些王国的兴趣显著增加,当时在al- ' Ula开始了实地考察,特别是在达丹、乌姆达拉吉、库蒂布等地。尽管人们的兴趣有所增加,但关于达旦人和利哈扬人之间关系的两个突出问题是,它们是两个独立的王国还是一个拥有不同名称的王国,以及达旦人和利哈扬人的起源。本文通过对现有考古证据的分析来探讨这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dadan and Lihyan, a Kingdom or Two Kingdoms: A Critical Study through Archaeological Evidence
The kingdoms of Dadan and Lihyan are among the most prominent ancient Arab kingdoms that arose in northwestern Arabia during the first millennium BC, specifically in al-‘Ula, considered to the capital of these two kingdoms. Interest in those kingdoms has increased significantly since the beginning of this millennium, when fieldwork started in al-‘Ula, specifically in sites such as Dadan, Umm Daraj, Tell Al-Kuthib and others. Despite this increase in interest, two prominent issues about the relationship between Dadan and Lihyan are the confusion regarding whether they were two separate kingdoms or one kingdom with different names, and the origin of the Dadanites and Lihyanites. This article examines these issues through the analysis of the available archaeological evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Some Aspects of Ancient Palmyra Society through Funerary Art in the Roman Period (م ب ق ر ا/ م ب ق ر) في النقوش النبطيَّة السينائيَّة ومخطوطات البحر الميِّت وقفيَّة طاهر موسى العرابي في مدينتي نابلس وجنين وجوارهما رمضان 1256هـ/ تشرين الأول 1840م: دراسة تحليلية Assessing the Conservation and Management Status in the Archaeological Site of Pella (Tabaqat Fahl) in Jordan قُوى العواصم القديمة وآليَّة صنع نفسها في الفعل السياسيي -مدينة صُحَارُ أنموذجًا-
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1