{"title":"监管扭曲及替代方案","authors":"H. Assa","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3611878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper we introduce a new distortion risk measure that is motivated by the equivalence made by the regulator between the using the CVaR of 97.5 percent instead of VaR of 99 percent. We introduce a distortion function that matches the value of the normal quantiles with the same for CVaR. We also study this distortion and show it's convex and that it is more risk averse than Wang's distortion.","PeriodicalId":203996,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Value-at-Risk (Topic)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulatory Distortions and Alternatives\",\"authors\":\"H. Assa\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3611878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this paper we introduce a new distortion risk measure that is motivated by the equivalence made by the regulator between the using the CVaR of 97.5 percent instead of VaR of 99 percent. We introduce a distortion function that matches the value of the normal quantiles with the same for CVaR. We also study this distortion and show it's convex and that it is more risk averse than Wang's distortion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":203996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Value-at-Risk (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Value-at-Risk (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3611878\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Value-at-Risk (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3611878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract In this paper we introduce a new distortion risk measure that is motivated by the equivalence made by the regulator between the using the CVaR of 97.5 percent instead of VaR of 99 percent. We introduce a distortion function that matches the value of the normal quantiles with the same for CVaR. We also study this distortion and show it's convex and that it is more risk averse than Wang's distortion.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
