用于对齐知识和文本集合的开放和封闭模式

Matthew Kelcey
{"title":"用于对齐知识和文本集合的开放和封闭模式","authors":"Matthew Kelcey","doi":"10.1145/2810133.2810140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When it comes to knowledge bases most people's first thought are structured sources such as Freebase/Wikidata and their relationship to similarly structured web sources such as Wikipedia. A lot of additional and interesting \"knowledge\" though is captured in unstructured databases constructed in a less supervised manner using open information extraction techniques. In this talk we'll discuss some of the differences between open/closed schema knowledge bases including the ideas of objective vs subjective content as well as freshness and trust. We'll give an overview on approaches to aligning such data sources in a way that their relative strengths can be combined and finish with applications of such alignments; particularly around open question and answer systems.","PeriodicalId":298747,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Exploiting Semantic Annotations in Information Retrieval","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open and Closed Schema for Aligning Knowledge and Text Collections\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Kelcey\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2810133.2810140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When it comes to knowledge bases most people's first thought are structured sources such as Freebase/Wikidata and their relationship to similarly structured web sources such as Wikipedia. A lot of additional and interesting \\\"knowledge\\\" though is captured in unstructured databases constructed in a less supervised manner using open information extraction techniques. In this talk we'll discuss some of the differences between open/closed schema knowledge bases including the ideas of objective vs subjective content as well as freshness and trust. We'll give an overview on approaches to aligning such data sources in a way that their relative strengths can be combined and finish with applications of such alignments; particularly around open question and answer systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Exploiting Semantic Annotations in Information Retrieval\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Exploiting Semantic Annotations in Information Retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2810133.2810140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Exploiting Semantic Annotations in Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2810133.2810140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

说到知识库,大多数人首先想到的是结构化资源,如Freebase/Wikidata,以及它们与类似结构化网络资源(如Wikipedia)的关系。然而,许多额外的和有趣的“知识”是在使用开放信息提取技术以较少监督的方式构建的非结构化数据库中捕获的。在这次演讲中,我们将讨论开放/封闭模式知识库之间的一些差异,包括客观内容与主观内容以及新鲜度和信任度的概念。我们将概述对齐这些数据源的方法,以便将它们的相对优势结合起来,并完成此类对齐的应用程序;特别是围绕开放式问答系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open and Closed Schema for Aligning Knowledge and Text Collections
When it comes to knowledge bases most people's first thought are structured sources such as Freebase/Wikidata and their relationship to similarly structured web sources such as Wikipedia. A lot of additional and interesting "knowledge" though is captured in unstructured databases constructed in a less supervised manner using open information extraction techniques. In this talk we'll discuss some of the differences between open/closed schema knowledge bases including the ideas of objective vs subjective content as well as freshness and trust. We'll give an overview on approaches to aligning such data sources in a way that their relative strengths can be combined and finish with applications of such alignments; particularly around open question and answer systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Temporal Reconciliation for Dating Photographs Using Entity Information Hugo: Entity-based News Search and Summarisation CADEminer: A System for Mining Consumer Reports on Adverse Drug Side Effects Contextualizing Data on a Content Management System Harnessing Semantics for Answer Sentence Retrieval
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1