O. Matiushkin, O. Husev, D. Vinnikov, Naser Vosoughi Kurdkandi
{"title":"基于展开电路的降压逆变器与H5、H6、HERIC拓扑的比较分析","authors":"O. Matiushkin, O. Husev, D. Vinnikov, Naser Vosoughi Kurdkandi","doi":"10.1109/speedam53979.2022.9842282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the comparative analysis between the buck-boost inverters based on the unfolding circuit and H5, H6, Highly Efficient and Reliable Inverter Concept (HERIC) inverters. The components design guidelines are presented for each topology. A simple open-loop system was chosen for a verification. The comparison contains 4 criteria: an overall inductances energy, an overall capacitor energy, a total voltage stress on semiconductors and conduction losses of semiconductors and the passive elements. The main advantage of the traditional H5, H6 or HERIC topologies is a simplicity of the operation and freewheeling states. However, conventional solution produces a high leakage current, which should be reduced by the additional switches or the common-mode choke. Buck-boost inverters based on unfolding circuit have more conduction losses, but they require fewer passive components and produces small leakage current.","PeriodicalId":365235,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM)","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Buck-Boost Inverters Based on Unfolding Circuit Versus H5, H6, HERIC Topologies\",\"authors\":\"O. Matiushkin, O. Husev, D. Vinnikov, Naser Vosoughi Kurdkandi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/speedam53979.2022.9842282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the comparative analysis between the buck-boost inverters based on the unfolding circuit and H5, H6, Highly Efficient and Reliable Inverter Concept (HERIC) inverters. The components design guidelines are presented for each topology. A simple open-loop system was chosen for a verification. The comparison contains 4 criteria: an overall inductances energy, an overall capacitor energy, a total voltage stress on semiconductors and conduction losses of semiconductors and the passive elements. The main advantage of the traditional H5, H6 or HERIC topologies is a simplicity of the operation and freewheeling states. However, conventional solution produces a high leakage current, which should be reduced by the additional switches or the common-mode choke. Buck-boost inverters based on unfolding circuit have more conduction losses, but they require fewer passive components and produces small leakage current.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM)\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/speedam53979.2022.9842282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/speedam53979.2022.9842282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Analysis of Buck-Boost Inverters Based on Unfolding Circuit Versus H5, H6, HERIC Topologies
This paper presents the comparative analysis between the buck-boost inverters based on the unfolding circuit and H5, H6, Highly Efficient and Reliable Inverter Concept (HERIC) inverters. The components design guidelines are presented for each topology. A simple open-loop system was chosen for a verification. The comparison contains 4 criteria: an overall inductances energy, an overall capacitor energy, a total voltage stress on semiconductors and conduction losses of semiconductors and the passive elements. The main advantage of the traditional H5, H6 or HERIC topologies is a simplicity of the operation and freewheeling states. However, conventional solution produces a high leakage current, which should be reduced by the additional switches or the common-mode choke. Buck-boost inverters based on unfolding circuit have more conduction losses, but they require fewer passive components and produces small leakage current.