价值驱动的贸易空间探索:一种优化可靠性规格和配置的新方法

C. Jackson, Sana U. Qasisar, M. Ryan
{"title":"价值驱动的贸易空间探索:一种优化可靠性规格和配置的新方法","authors":"C. Jackson, Sana U. Qasisar, M. Ryan","doi":"10.1109/RAM.2017.7889655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Value Driven Tradespace Exploration (VDTSE) framework developed in this paper is a new and sophisticated approach to optimizing reliability throughout design, and in so doing dynamically apportion reliability goals to all system elements. The VDTSE framework is an extension of existing approaches that have been successfully used to optimize many design dimensions. This allows (for example) reliability, cost and other design characteristics (such as weight, volume and speed) to be automatically and continually optimized throughout the design process. This represents a substantial improvement on ‘conventional’ approaches to reliability goal setting that involve ‘fixed’ reliability requirements that reflect a single scenario of ‘satisfactory’ performance. This results in a short-sited ‘binary’ approach to reliability value — the system is ‘satisfactory’ if it exceeds the requirement. No value is placed on exceeding requirements, nor is value assigned systems that do not meet strict requirements but may offer more ‘business’ value through other benefits such as reduced cost, weight or volume. For ‘conventional’ approaches that involve specifying reliability requirements, to result in optimal systems the customer needs to have exhaustively analyzed all plausible design configurations, accurately modeled all trends in emerging technology, and put forth a demonstrable requirement that aligns with their analysis. In short, the customer needs to enact the design process before the producer does — a process which is impractical and inefficient. The VDTSE framework outlined herein avoids all these issues. It uses component design characteristics (that include cost and reliability) to establish a tradespace of potential system design solutions. By establishing the concept of ‘value’ to be a function of design characteristics, a Pareto frontier can be identified which contains the set of al locally optimized design solutions. The VDTSE involves an algorithm that rapidly identifies the Pareto frontier from a large number of candidate designs. Finally, this allows the optimum design to be determined (in terms of organizational value) that also involves reliability goals apportioned to individual components and sub-systems.","PeriodicalId":138871,"journal":{"name":"2017 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","volume":"1 17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value driven tradespace exploration: A new approach to optimize reliability specification and allocation\",\"authors\":\"C. Jackson, Sana U. Qasisar, M. Ryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAM.2017.7889655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Value Driven Tradespace Exploration (VDTSE) framework developed in this paper is a new and sophisticated approach to optimizing reliability throughout design, and in so doing dynamically apportion reliability goals to all system elements. The VDTSE framework is an extension of existing approaches that have been successfully used to optimize many design dimensions. This allows (for example) reliability, cost and other design characteristics (such as weight, volume and speed) to be automatically and continually optimized throughout the design process. This represents a substantial improvement on ‘conventional’ approaches to reliability goal setting that involve ‘fixed’ reliability requirements that reflect a single scenario of ‘satisfactory’ performance. This results in a short-sited ‘binary’ approach to reliability value — the system is ‘satisfactory’ if it exceeds the requirement. No value is placed on exceeding requirements, nor is value assigned systems that do not meet strict requirements but may offer more ‘business’ value through other benefits such as reduced cost, weight or volume. For ‘conventional’ approaches that involve specifying reliability requirements, to result in optimal systems the customer needs to have exhaustively analyzed all plausible design configurations, accurately modeled all trends in emerging technology, and put forth a demonstrable requirement that aligns with their analysis. In short, the customer needs to enact the design process before the producer does — a process which is impractical and inefficient. The VDTSE framework outlined herein avoids all these issues. It uses component design characteristics (that include cost and reliability) to establish a tradespace of potential system design solutions. By establishing the concept of ‘value’ to be a function of design characteristics, a Pareto frontier can be identified which contains the set of al locally optimized design solutions. The VDTSE involves an algorithm that rapidly identifies the Pareto frontier from a large number of candidate designs. Finally, this allows the optimum design to be determined (in terms of organizational value) that also involves reliability goals apportioned to individual components and sub-systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)\",\"volume\":\"1 17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAM.2017.7889655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAM.2017.7889655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文开发的价值驱动贸易空间探索(VDTSE)框架是一种新的复杂方法,可以在整个设计过程中优化可靠性,并在此过程中动态地将可靠性目标分配给所有系统元素。VDTSE框架是现有方法的扩展,已经成功地用于优化许多设计维度。这使得(例如)可靠性,成本和其他设计特性(如重量,体积和速度)在整个设计过程中自动和持续优化。这代表了对可靠性目标设定的“传统”方法的实质性改进,这些方法涉及反映“令人满意”性能的单一场景的“固定”可靠性要求。这导致了一种短址的“二元”可靠性值方法——如果系统超过要求,则系统是“令人满意的”。超出需求没有价值,不满足严格需求但可能通过降低成本、重量或体积等其他好处提供更多“业务”价值的系统也没有价值。对于涉及指定可靠性要求的“传统”方法,为了产生最佳系统,客户需要详尽地分析所有合理的设计配置,准确地模拟新兴技术的所有趋势,并提出与他们的分析一致的可论证的需求。简而言之,客户需要在生产商之前制定设计流程-这是一个不切实际和低效的过程。本文概述的VDTSE框架避免了所有这些问题。它使用组件设计特征(包括成本和可靠性)来建立潜在系统设计解决方案的交易空间。通过将“价值”概念建立为设计特征的函数,可以确定包含所有局部优化设计解决方案集的帕累托边界。VDTSE涉及一种从大量候选设计中快速识别帕累托边界的算法。最后,这允许确定最优设计(根据组织价值),该设计还涉及分配给单个组件和子系统的可靠性目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Value driven tradespace exploration: A new approach to optimize reliability specification and allocation
The Value Driven Tradespace Exploration (VDTSE) framework developed in this paper is a new and sophisticated approach to optimizing reliability throughout design, and in so doing dynamically apportion reliability goals to all system elements. The VDTSE framework is an extension of existing approaches that have been successfully used to optimize many design dimensions. This allows (for example) reliability, cost and other design characteristics (such as weight, volume and speed) to be automatically and continually optimized throughout the design process. This represents a substantial improvement on ‘conventional’ approaches to reliability goal setting that involve ‘fixed’ reliability requirements that reflect a single scenario of ‘satisfactory’ performance. This results in a short-sited ‘binary’ approach to reliability value — the system is ‘satisfactory’ if it exceeds the requirement. No value is placed on exceeding requirements, nor is value assigned systems that do not meet strict requirements but may offer more ‘business’ value through other benefits such as reduced cost, weight or volume. For ‘conventional’ approaches that involve specifying reliability requirements, to result in optimal systems the customer needs to have exhaustively analyzed all plausible design configurations, accurately modeled all trends in emerging technology, and put forth a demonstrable requirement that aligns with their analysis. In short, the customer needs to enact the design process before the producer does — a process which is impractical and inefficient. The VDTSE framework outlined herein avoids all these issues. It uses component design characteristics (that include cost and reliability) to establish a tradespace of potential system design solutions. By establishing the concept of ‘value’ to be a function of design characteristics, a Pareto frontier can be identified which contains the set of al locally optimized design solutions. The VDTSE involves an algorithm that rapidly identifies the Pareto frontier from a large number of candidate designs. Finally, this allows the optimum design to be determined (in terms of organizational value) that also involves reliability goals apportioned to individual components and sub-systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reliability study on high-k bi-layer dielectrics Contracting for system availability under fleet expansion: Redundancy allocation or spares inventory? Risk modeling of variable probability external initiating events Human reliability assessments: Using the past (Shuttle) to predict the future (Orion) Uniform analysis of fault trees through model transformations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1