Alexandr Andoni, M. Charikar, Ofer Neiman, Huy L. Nguyen
{"title":"L1中降维的近线性下界","authors":"Alexandr Andoni, M. Charikar, Ofer Neiman, Huy L. Nguyen","doi":"10.1109/FOCS.2011.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given a set of $n$ points in $\\ell_{1}$, how many dimensions are needed to represent all pair wise distances within a specific distortion? This dimension-distortion tradeoff question is well understood for the $\\ell_{2}$ norm, where $O((\\log n)/\\epsilon^{2})$ dimensions suffice to achieve $1+\\epsilon$ distortion. In sharp contrast, there is a significant gap between upper and lower bounds for dimension reduction in $\\ell_{1}$. A recent result shows that distortion $1+\\epsilon$ can be achieved with $n/\\epsilon^{2}$ dimensions. On the other hand, the only lower bounds known are that distortion $\\delta$ requires $n^{\\Omega(1/\\delta^2)}$ dimensions and that distortion $1+\\epsilon$ requires $n^{1/2-O(\\epsilon \\log(1/\\epsilon))}$ dimensions. In this work, we show the first near linear lower bounds for dimension reduction in $\\ell_{1}$. In particular, we show that $1+\\epsilon$ distortion requires at least $n^{1-O(1/\\log(1/\\epsilon))}$ dimensions. Our proofs are combinatorial, but inspired by linear programming. In fact, our techniques lead to a simple combinatorial argument that is equivalent to the LP based proof of Brinkman-Charikar for lower bounds on dimension reduction in $\\ell_{1}$.","PeriodicalId":326048,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Near Linear Lower Bound for Dimension Reduction in L1\",\"authors\":\"Alexandr Andoni, M. Charikar, Ofer Neiman, Huy L. Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FOCS.2011.87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Given a set of $n$ points in $\\\\ell_{1}$, how many dimensions are needed to represent all pair wise distances within a specific distortion? This dimension-distortion tradeoff question is well understood for the $\\\\ell_{2}$ norm, where $O((\\\\log n)/\\\\epsilon^{2})$ dimensions suffice to achieve $1+\\\\epsilon$ distortion. In sharp contrast, there is a significant gap between upper and lower bounds for dimension reduction in $\\\\ell_{1}$. A recent result shows that distortion $1+\\\\epsilon$ can be achieved with $n/\\\\epsilon^{2}$ dimensions. On the other hand, the only lower bounds known are that distortion $\\\\delta$ requires $n^{\\\\Omega(1/\\\\delta^2)}$ dimensions and that distortion $1+\\\\epsilon$ requires $n^{1/2-O(\\\\epsilon \\\\log(1/\\\\epsilon))}$ dimensions. In this work, we show the first near linear lower bounds for dimension reduction in $\\\\ell_{1}$. In particular, we show that $1+\\\\epsilon$ distortion requires at least $n^{1-O(1/\\\\log(1/\\\\epsilon))}$ dimensions. Our proofs are combinatorial, but inspired by linear programming. In fact, our techniques lead to a simple combinatorial argument that is equivalent to the LP based proof of Brinkman-Charikar for lower bounds on dimension reduction in $\\\\ell_{1}$.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2011.87\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCS.2011.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Near Linear Lower Bound for Dimension Reduction in L1
Given a set of $n$ points in $\ell_{1}$, how many dimensions are needed to represent all pair wise distances within a specific distortion? This dimension-distortion tradeoff question is well understood for the $\ell_{2}$ norm, where $O((\log n)/\epsilon^{2})$ dimensions suffice to achieve $1+\epsilon$ distortion. In sharp contrast, there is a significant gap between upper and lower bounds for dimension reduction in $\ell_{1}$. A recent result shows that distortion $1+\epsilon$ can be achieved with $n/\epsilon^{2}$ dimensions. On the other hand, the only lower bounds known are that distortion $\delta$ requires $n^{\Omega(1/\delta^2)}$ dimensions and that distortion $1+\epsilon$ requires $n^{1/2-O(\epsilon \log(1/\epsilon))}$ dimensions. In this work, we show the first near linear lower bounds for dimension reduction in $\ell_{1}$. In particular, we show that $1+\epsilon$ distortion requires at least $n^{1-O(1/\log(1/\epsilon))}$ dimensions. Our proofs are combinatorial, but inspired by linear programming. In fact, our techniques lead to a simple combinatorial argument that is equivalent to the LP based proof of Brinkman-Charikar for lower bounds on dimension reduction in $\ell_{1}$.