文本分类的学生谓词使用自动误解分类

Brian A. Landron-Rivera, N. Santiago, Aidsa Santiago, J. F. Vega-Riveros
{"title":"文本分类的学生谓词使用自动误解分类","authors":"Brian A. Landron-Rivera, N. Santiago, Aidsa Santiago, J. F. Vega-Riveros","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2018.8658680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Research Category Full Paper presents an approach for categorizing student misconceptions about dynamics and heat transfer using text classification. Research in educational engineering describes how science concepts can be ontologically categorized into two major categories (substances and processes) according to their nature. Students can acquire misconceptions by incorrectly categorizing concepts. Predicate tests help to determine when misconceptions have occurred and aid in customizing curriculum content. However predicate tests rely on time-consuming, manual labor. The main goal of this research was to show how predicate tests could be automated with text classification models using a previously annotated dataset. We compared classifier performance between WEKA’s Support Vector Machines, Multinomial Naïve Bayes, Logistic Regression, and Bayesian Logistic Regression implementations using the emergent process and sequential process ontological categories as labels. We compared model performance using WEKA’s N-Gram tokenizer with 3-grams vs. using Java’s WordTokenizer to convert our word dataset to numerical vectors. Models were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation considering accuracy, F-measure, and kappa coefficient as measures of performance. We have shown the feasibility of using text classification for misconception assessment. Our implementation of predicate test automation can play an important role in speeding up misconception assessment research and curriculum design research.","PeriodicalId":354904,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Text classification of student predicate use for automatic misconception categorization\",\"authors\":\"Brian A. Landron-Rivera, N. Santiago, Aidsa Santiago, J. F. Vega-Riveros\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.2018.8658680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Research Category Full Paper presents an approach for categorizing student misconceptions about dynamics and heat transfer using text classification. Research in educational engineering describes how science concepts can be ontologically categorized into two major categories (substances and processes) according to their nature. Students can acquire misconceptions by incorrectly categorizing concepts. Predicate tests help to determine when misconceptions have occurred and aid in customizing curriculum content. However predicate tests rely on time-consuming, manual labor. The main goal of this research was to show how predicate tests could be automated with text classification models using a previously annotated dataset. We compared classifier performance between WEKA’s Support Vector Machines, Multinomial Naïve Bayes, Logistic Regression, and Bayesian Logistic Regression implementations using the emergent process and sequential process ontological categories as labels. We compared model performance using WEKA’s N-Gram tokenizer with 3-grams vs. using Java’s WordTokenizer to convert our word dataset to numerical vectors. Models were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation considering accuracy, F-measure, and kappa coefficient as measures of performance. We have shown the feasibility of using text classification for misconception assessment. Our implementation of predicate test automation can play an important role in speeding up misconception assessment research and curriculum design research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658680\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2018.8658680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一种利用文本分类方法对学生对动力学和热传递的误解进行分类的方法。教育工程研究描述了科学概念如何根据其本质在本体论上分为两大类(物质和过程)。学生可以通过错误地对概念进行分类而获得误解。谓词测试有助于确定误解何时发生,并有助于定制课程内容。然而,谓词测试依赖于耗时的体力劳动。本研究的主要目标是展示如何使用先前注释的数据集使用文本分类模型自动化谓词测试。我们比较了WEKA的支持向量机、多项式Naïve贝叶斯、逻辑回归和使用紧急过程和顺序过程本体类别作为标签的贝叶斯逻辑回归实现之间的分类器性能。我们比较了使用WEKA的N-Gram标记器和使用Java的WordTokenizer将我们的单词数据集转换为数字向量的模型性能。模型使用10倍交叉验证进行评估,考虑准确性、f测量和kappa系数作为性能的衡量标准。我们已经证明了使用文本分类进行误解评估的可行性。谓词测试自动化的实现对加快误解评价研究和课程设计研究具有重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Text classification of student predicate use for automatic misconception categorization
This Research Category Full Paper presents an approach for categorizing student misconceptions about dynamics and heat transfer using text classification. Research in educational engineering describes how science concepts can be ontologically categorized into two major categories (substances and processes) according to their nature. Students can acquire misconceptions by incorrectly categorizing concepts. Predicate tests help to determine when misconceptions have occurred and aid in customizing curriculum content. However predicate tests rely on time-consuming, manual labor. The main goal of this research was to show how predicate tests could be automated with text classification models using a previously annotated dataset. We compared classifier performance between WEKA’s Support Vector Machines, Multinomial Naïve Bayes, Logistic Regression, and Bayesian Logistic Regression implementations using the emergent process and sequential process ontological categories as labels. We compared model performance using WEKA’s N-Gram tokenizer with 3-grams vs. using Java’s WordTokenizer to convert our word dataset to numerical vectors. Models were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation considering accuracy, F-measure, and kappa coefficient as measures of performance. We have shown the feasibility of using text classification for misconception assessment. Our implementation of predicate test automation can play an important role in speeding up misconception assessment research and curriculum design research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DCLab: A Web-based System for Digital Logic Experiment Teaching Who I Am Becoming, Now: Toward a Computer Science Professional Identity Instrument Practical Education in IoT through Collaborative Work on Open-Source Projects with Industry and Entrepreneurial Organizations A multidimensional ELO model for matching learning objects Investigating the ways in which Student Agency develops through Engagement with Knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1