{"title":"免费SI:互连耦合延迟和跃迁效应的机器学习","authors":"A. Kahng, Mulong Luo, S. Nath","doi":"10.1109/SLIP.2015.7171706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In advanced technology nodes, incremental delay due to coupling is a serious concern. Design companies spend significant resources on static timing analysis (STA) tool licenses with signal integrity (SI) enabled. The runtime of the STA tools in SI mode is typically large due to complex algorithms and iterative calculation of timing windows to accurately determine aggressor and victim alignments, as well as delay and slew estimations. In this work, we develop machine learning-based predictors of timing in SI mode based on timing reports from non-SI mode. Timing analysis in non-SI mode is faster and the license costs can be several times less than those of SI mode. We determine electrical and logic structure parameters that affect the incremental arc delay/slew and path delay (i.e., the difference in arrival times at the clock pin of the launch flip-flop and the D pin of the capture flip-flop) in SI mode, and develop models that can predict these SI-aware delays. We report worst-case error of 7.0ps and average error of 0.7ps for our models to predict incremental transition time, worst-case error of 5.2ps and average error of 1.2ps for our models to predict incremental delay, and worst-case error of 8.2ps and average error of 1.7ps for our models to predict path delay, in 28nm FDSOI technology. We also demonstrate that our models are robust across designs and signoff constraints at a particular technology node.","PeriodicalId":431489,"journal":{"name":"2015 ACM/IEEE International Workshop on System Level Interconnect Prediction (SLIP)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SI for free: machine learning of interconnect coupling delay and transition effects\",\"authors\":\"A. Kahng, Mulong Luo, S. Nath\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SLIP.2015.7171706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In advanced technology nodes, incremental delay due to coupling is a serious concern. Design companies spend significant resources on static timing analysis (STA) tool licenses with signal integrity (SI) enabled. The runtime of the STA tools in SI mode is typically large due to complex algorithms and iterative calculation of timing windows to accurately determine aggressor and victim alignments, as well as delay and slew estimations. In this work, we develop machine learning-based predictors of timing in SI mode based on timing reports from non-SI mode. Timing analysis in non-SI mode is faster and the license costs can be several times less than those of SI mode. We determine electrical and logic structure parameters that affect the incremental arc delay/slew and path delay (i.e., the difference in arrival times at the clock pin of the launch flip-flop and the D pin of the capture flip-flop) in SI mode, and develop models that can predict these SI-aware delays. We report worst-case error of 7.0ps and average error of 0.7ps for our models to predict incremental transition time, worst-case error of 5.2ps and average error of 1.2ps for our models to predict incremental delay, and worst-case error of 8.2ps and average error of 1.7ps for our models to predict path delay, in 28nm FDSOI technology. We also demonstrate that our models are robust across designs and signoff constraints at a particular technology node.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 ACM/IEEE International Workshop on System Level Interconnect Prediction (SLIP)\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"41\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 ACM/IEEE International Workshop on System Level Interconnect Prediction (SLIP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SLIP.2015.7171706\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 ACM/IEEE International Workshop on System Level Interconnect Prediction (SLIP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SLIP.2015.7171706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
SI for free: machine learning of interconnect coupling delay and transition effects
In advanced technology nodes, incremental delay due to coupling is a serious concern. Design companies spend significant resources on static timing analysis (STA) tool licenses with signal integrity (SI) enabled. The runtime of the STA tools in SI mode is typically large due to complex algorithms and iterative calculation of timing windows to accurately determine aggressor and victim alignments, as well as delay and slew estimations. In this work, we develop machine learning-based predictors of timing in SI mode based on timing reports from non-SI mode. Timing analysis in non-SI mode is faster and the license costs can be several times less than those of SI mode. We determine electrical and logic structure parameters that affect the incremental arc delay/slew and path delay (i.e., the difference in arrival times at the clock pin of the launch flip-flop and the D pin of the capture flip-flop) in SI mode, and develop models that can predict these SI-aware delays. We report worst-case error of 7.0ps and average error of 0.7ps for our models to predict incremental transition time, worst-case error of 5.2ps and average error of 1.2ps for our models to predict incremental delay, and worst-case error of 8.2ps and average error of 1.7ps for our models to predict path delay, in 28nm FDSOI technology. We also demonstrate that our models are robust across designs and signoff constraints at a particular technology node.