通过系统的小组改革提高学习效果——技能和个性在软件工程教育中的作用

A. Mujkanovic, A. Bollin
{"title":"通过系统的小组改革提高学习效果——技能和个性在软件工程教育中的作用","authors":"A. Mujkanovic, A. Bollin","doi":"10.1145/2897586.2897615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Group or team formation has been a well-studied field in numerous contexts, such as business teams, project teams, and educational teams. There has, however, been little consideration of how groups or particularly project teams might have to be reorganized during a lecture in order to yield an optimal learning outcome. Empirical studies show that the outcome of groups will be affected by a number of factors, including the individual behavior of each group member, their skills and inclinations. In this research, the authors aim at finding correlations between the individual characteristics and learning outcomes during a running lecture so that teaching and learning can be improved. A study has been carried out that involved software engineering students over the past three years. The results show an improvement in the learning outcomes for groups that were systematically formed, which, for future settings, could enable educators as well as project leaders to systematically form groups and improve the outcomes of these groups in various domains.","PeriodicalId":318848,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/ACM Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Learning Outcomes through Systematic Group Reformation - The Role of Skills and Personality in Software Engineering Education\",\"authors\":\"A. Mujkanovic, A. Bollin\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2897586.2897615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Group or team formation has been a well-studied field in numerous contexts, such as business teams, project teams, and educational teams. There has, however, been little consideration of how groups or particularly project teams might have to be reorganized during a lecture in order to yield an optimal learning outcome. Empirical studies show that the outcome of groups will be affected by a number of factors, including the individual behavior of each group member, their skills and inclinations. In this research, the authors aim at finding correlations between the individual characteristics and learning outcomes during a running lecture so that teaching and learning can be improved. A study has been carried out that involved software engineering students over the past three years. The results show an improvement in the learning outcomes for groups that were systematically formed, which, for future settings, could enable educators as well as project leaders to systematically form groups and improve the outcomes of these groups in various domains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2897586.2897615\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/ACM Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2897586.2897615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

在许多上下文中,例如业务团队、项目团队和教育团队,团队或团队形成已经是一个得到充分研究的领域。然而,很少有人考虑如何在讲座期间重新组织小组或特别是项目团队,以产生最佳的学习结果。实证研究表明,群体的结果会受到许多因素的影响,包括每个群体成员的个人行为、他们的技能和倾向。在本研究中,作者旨在发现个体特征与学习成果之间的相关性,从而改善教学和学习。在过去的三年里,一项涉及软件工程专业学生的研究已经开展。研究结果表明,系统形成的小组的学习成果有所改善,对于未来的设置,这可以使教育工作者和项目负责人系统地形成小组,并改善这些小组在各个领域的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving Learning Outcomes through Systematic Group Reformation - The Role of Skills and Personality in Software Engineering Education
Group or team formation has been a well-studied field in numerous contexts, such as business teams, project teams, and educational teams. There has, however, been little consideration of how groups or particularly project teams might have to be reorganized during a lecture in order to yield an optimal learning outcome. Empirical studies show that the outcome of groups will be affected by a number of factors, including the individual behavior of each group member, their skills and inclinations. In this research, the authors aim at finding correlations between the individual characteristics and learning outcomes during a running lecture so that teaching and learning can be improved. A study has been carried out that involved software engineering students over the past three years. The results show an improvement in the learning outcomes for groups that were systematically formed, which, for future settings, could enable educators as well as project leaders to systematically form groups and improve the outcomes of these groups in various domains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sociodrama: One More Technique to Foster Collaboration in Software Engineering GO-MUC: A Strategy Design Method Considering Requirements of User and Business by Goal-Oriented Measurement Beliefs, Practices, and Personalities of Software Engineers: A Survey in a Large Software Company Collaboration Change in Enterprise Software Development Code Review Participation: Game Theoretical Modeling of Reviewers in Gerrit Datasets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1