中国内幕交易法的执行:一个实证与比较的视角

(Robin) Hui Huang
{"title":"中国内幕交易法的执行:一个实证与比较的视角","authors":"(Robin) Hui Huang","doi":"10.1093/AJCL/AVAA018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper conducts the first comprehensive and systematic empirical analysis of all relevant insider trading cases in China since the birth of Chinese securities markets in the early 1990s and till middle 2017, shedding important light on the way in which China’s insider trading law has been enforced by the regulator and criminal courts in practice. First, it generates descriptive statistics on the features of insider trading cases, such as the total number of cases over the period, the temporal distribution of the cases, the identity of the insider and the nature of the insider information. Second, it measures the intensity of insider trading enforcement, and compares the Chinese situation with six jurisdictions overseas, including the US, the UK, Australia, Canada, Singapore and Hong Kong. Third, using multiple regression analyses, it identifies potential factors determining the administrative and criminal penalties against insider trading. <br><br>The results of the empirical study indicate that China has significantly stepped up its efforts to crack down on insider trading in recent years, resulting in a sharp increase of insider trading cases, particularly criminal cases since 2008. While the Chinese insider trading law is essentially transplanted from overseas jurisdictions, its enforcement has exhibited distinctive features in its local environment. Judging by the type, magnitude and frequency of the sanctions imposed, the intensity of insider trading enforcement in China seems to be at a level comparable to relevant jurisdictions overseas. Administrative and criminal penalties against insider trading are found to be significantly influenced by some factors, notably the amount of illegal proceeds, the magnitude of social impact, the presence of mitigating circumstances, and whether the trader used others’ accounts to trade. The hope is that the empirical findings may help inform the policy debate over the regulation of insider trading in China and beyond. <br>","PeriodicalId":356075,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Law eJournal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enforcement of Chinese Insider Trading Law: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective\",\"authors\":\"(Robin) Hui Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/AJCL/AVAA018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper conducts the first comprehensive and systematic empirical analysis of all relevant insider trading cases in China since the birth of Chinese securities markets in the early 1990s and till middle 2017, shedding important light on the way in which China’s insider trading law has been enforced by the regulator and criminal courts in practice. First, it generates descriptive statistics on the features of insider trading cases, such as the total number of cases over the period, the temporal distribution of the cases, the identity of the insider and the nature of the insider information. Second, it measures the intensity of insider trading enforcement, and compares the Chinese situation with six jurisdictions overseas, including the US, the UK, Australia, Canada, Singapore and Hong Kong. Third, using multiple regression analyses, it identifies potential factors determining the administrative and criminal penalties against insider trading. <br><br>The results of the empirical study indicate that China has significantly stepped up its efforts to crack down on insider trading in recent years, resulting in a sharp increase of insider trading cases, particularly criminal cases since 2008. While the Chinese insider trading law is essentially transplanted from overseas jurisdictions, its enforcement has exhibited distinctive features in its local environment. Judging by the type, magnitude and frequency of the sanctions imposed, the intensity of insider trading enforcement in China seems to be at a level comparable to relevant jurisdictions overseas. Administrative and criminal penalties against insider trading are found to be significantly influenced by some factors, notably the amount of illegal proceeds, the magnitude of social impact, the presence of mitigating circumstances, and whether the trader used others’ accounts to trade. The hope is that the empirical findings may help inform the policy debate over the regulation of insider trading in China and beyond. <br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":356075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/AJCL/AVAA018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/AJCL/AVAA018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文首次对中国证券市场自上世纪90年代初诞生到2017年中期的所有相关内幕交易案件进行了全面、系统的实证分析,对中国监管机构和刑事法院在实践中执行内幕交易法的方式提供了重要启示。首先,对内幕交易案件的特征进行描述性统计,如该时期的案件总数、案件的时间分布、内幕人的身份、内幕信息的性质等。其次,它衡量了内幕交易执法力度,并将中国的情况与美国、英国、澳大利亚、加拿大、新加坡和香港等6个海外司法管辖区进行了比较。第三,运用多元回归分析,找出决定内幕交易行政和刑事处罚的潜在因素。实证研究结果表明,近年来中国对内幕交易的打击力度明显加大,内幕交易案件特别是刑事案件自2008年以来急剧增加。虽然中国的内幕交易法基本上是从海外司法管辖区移植过来的,但其执行在中国本土环境中表现出了鲜明的特点。从制裁的类型、力度和频率来看,中国对内幕交易的执法力度似乎处于与海外相关司法管辖区相当的水平。研究发现,对内幕交易的行政处罚和刑事处罚受到一些因素的显著影响,特别是违法所得的数额、社会影响的程度、是否存在减轻处罚情节以及交易者是否使用他人账户进行交易。人们希望,这些实证研究结果可能有助于为中国及其他国家有关内幕交易监管的政策辩论提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enforcement of Chinese Insider Trading Law: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective
This paper conducts the first comprehensive and systematic empirical analysis of all relevant insider trading cases in China since the birth of Chinese securities markets in the early 1990s and till middle 2017, shedding important light on the way in which China’s insider trading law has been enforced by the regulator and criminal courts in practice. First, it generates descriptive statistics on the features of insider trading cases, such as the total number of cases over the period, the temporal distribution of the cases, the identity of the insider and the nature of the insider information. Second, it measures the intensity of insider trading enforcement, and compares the Chinese situation with six jurisdictions overseas, including the US, the UK, Australia, Canada, Singapore and Hong Kong. Third, using multiple regression analyses, it identifies potential factors determining the administrative and criminal penalties against insider trading.

The results of the empirical study indicate that China has significantly stepped up its efforts to crack down on insider trading in recent years, resulting in a sharp increase of insider trading cases, particularly criminal cases since 2008. While the Chinese insider trading law is essentially transplanted from overseas jurisdictions, its enforcement has exhibited distinctive features in its local environment. Judging by the type, magnitude and frequency of the sanctions imposed, the intensity of insider trading enforcement in China seems to be at a level comparable to relevant jurisdictions overseas. Administrative and criminal penalties against insider trading are found to be significantly influenced by some factors, notably the amount of illegal proceeds, the magnitude of social impact, the presence of mitigating circumstances, and whether the trader used others’ accounts to trade. The hope is that the empirical findings may help inform the policy debate over the regulation of insider trading in China and beyond.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Better Model for Australia’s Enhanced FinTech Sandbox The Impact of Foreign Slowdown on the U.S. Economy: An Open Economy DSGE Perspective Explaining the Limits of the WTO in Shaping the Rule of Law in China Economic Development through Migration - Facilitating Skilled Migration to China through the Belt and Road Initiative The Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs: Contributing to the Grotian Moment in Asia:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1