{"title":"“亮粉色的毛茸茸的东西”:同性恋者对“娘娘腔的男同性恋”的构造,以及他们被边缘化的潜在基础","authors":"C. Walton","doi":"10.53841/bpslg.2003.4.2.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is concerned with gendered constructions of ‘gay men’. Two excerpts, taken from the transcripts of focus group discussions with men on the topic of men and emotions, are subjected to discourse analysis to identify the discursive resources and the ideological relationships that are invoked in the construction of ‘effeminate gay men’. This construction is shown to be a potential source of humour and, through the discourse of attractiveness, to constitute the basis for discrimination and marginalisation. Importantly, these resources and the constructions and subject positions they constitute are invoked by speakers who self-identified as ‘gay men’. Thus, the analysis demonstrates both the power and appeal of ‘hegemonic’ constructions of gender for speakers who might themselves be subject to ‘gender’x discrimination.","PeriodicalId":311409,"journal":{"name":"Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Bright pink fluffy things”: Gay speakers’ constructions of ‘effeminate gay men’ and the potential bases for their marginalisation\",\"authors\":\"C. Walton\",\"doi\":\"10.53841/bpslg.2003.4.2.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is concerned with gendered constructions of ‘gay men’. Two excerpts, taken from the transcripts of focus group discussions with men on the topic of men and emotions, are subjected to discourse analysis to identify the discursive resources and the ideological relationships that are invoked in the construction of ‘effeminate gay men’. This construction is shown to be a potential source of humour and, through the discourse of attractiveness, to constitute the basis for discrimination and marginalisation. Importantly, these resources and the constructions and subject positions they constitute are invoked by speakers who self-identified as ‘gay men’. Thus, the analysis demonstrates both the power and appeal of ‘hegemonic’ constructions of gender for speakers who might themselves be subject to ‘gender’x discrimination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":311409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpslg.2003.4.2.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpslg.2003.4.2.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
“Bright pink fluffy things”: Gay speakers’ constructions of ‘effeminate gay men’ and the potential bases for their marginalisation
This article is concerned with gendered constructions of ‘gay men’. Two excerpts, taken from the transcripts of focus group discussions with men on the topic of men and emotions, are subjected to discourse analysis to identify the discursive resources and the ideological relationships that are invoked in the construction of ‘effeminate gay men’. This construction is shown to be a potential source of humour and, through the discourse of attractiveness, to constitute the basis for discrimination and marginalisation. Importantly, these resources and the constructions and subject positions they constitute are invoked by speakers who self-identified as ‘gay men’. Thus, the analysis demonstrates both the power and appeal of ‘hegemonic’ constructions of gender for speakers who might themselves be subject to ‘gender’x discrimination.