小细胞肺癌患者血清肿瘤标志物的选择:原胃泌素释放肽、神经元特异性烯醇化酶和癌胚抗原

Lisi Huang, Hai-yan Yan, Longqiaozi Sun, Ying Xu, Donghao Cai, Xiao-hui Li, Xinliang Chen, Xiao-hong Luo, C. Duan
{"title":"小细胞肺癌患者血清肿瘤标志物的选择:原胃泌素释放肽、神经元特异性烯醇化酶和癌胚抗原","authors":"Lisi Huang, Hai-yan Yan, Longqiaozi Sun, Ying Xu, Donghao Cai, Xiao-hui Li, Xinliang Chen, Xiao-hong Luo, C. Duan","doi":"10.1097/JBR.0000000000000002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. It mainly consists of 2 histological types: small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, including squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma). The present study aimed to assess the role of serum progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and their combinations in the histological diagnosis of lung cancer (specially SCLC), which is of great importance for the initiation of treatment and prognostic implications. Serum ProGRP, NSE, and CEA were determined by the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) in 66 patients with SCLC, 73 with adenocarcinoma, 44 with squamous cell carcinoma, 45 with non-malignant pulmonary diseases, and 50 healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to compare the predictive ability of each biochemical marker and their combined detection models to discriminate among the patients with lung cancers of different histological groups, benign pulmonary diseases and healthy individuals. In the ECLIA detection system, ProGRP showed the sensitivity and specificity for SCLC diagnosis were 71.2% and 91.1% to 93.2%, respectively. Among the markers, the largest area under the ROCs was for ProGRP in discriminating SCLC from benign pulmonary diseases, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma (0.815, 0.859, and 0.835, respectively), which indicated that ProGRP was the most efficient marker for identifying SCLC. Besides, ProGRP and NSE exhibited almost equivalent diagnostic performance in discriminating SCLC from benign diseases. As for squamous cell carcinoma, we recommended proGRP, while for adenocarcinoma, the combination of proGRP and CEA was preferred. Remarkably, when ProGRP ⩽ 66 pg/mL, CEA was of great value in diagnosing SCLC and adenocarcinoma. If CEA ⩽ 5 ng/mL, the patient was at higher risk for SCLC, whereas the patient was more likely to be diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. Our study provided promising information about the diagnostic values of serum ProGRP, NSE, CEA in distinguishing SCLC from benign pulmonary diseases and NSCLC, which was of crucial clinical significance in the early diagnosis and therapy of SCLC.","PeriodicalId":150904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bio-X Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choice of serum tumor markers in patients with small cell lung cancer: progastrin-releasing peptide, neuron-specific enolase, and carcinoembryonic antigen\",\"authors\":\"Lisi Huang, Hai-yan Yan, Longqiaozi Sun, Ying Xu, Donghao Cai, Xiao-hui Li, Xinliang Chen, Xiao-hong Luo, C. Duan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JBR.0000000000000002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. It mainly consists of 2 histological types: small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, including squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma). The present study aimed to assess the role of serum progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and their combinations in the histological diagnosis of lung cancer (specially SCLC), which is of great importance for the initiation of treatment and prognostic implications. Serum ProGRP, NSE, and CEA were determined by the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) in 66 patients with SCLC, 73 with adenocarcinoma, 44 with squamous cell carcinoma, 45 with non-malignant pulmonary diseases, and 50 healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to compare the predictive ability of each biochemical marker and their combined detection models to discriminate among the patients with lung cancers of different histological groups, benign pulmonary diseases and healthy individuals. In the ECLIA detection system, ProGRP showed the sensitivity and specificity for SCLC diagnosis were 71.2% and 91.1% to 93.2%, respectively. Among the markers, the largest area under the ROCs was for ProGRP in discriminating SCLC from benign pulmonary diseases, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma (0.815, 0.859, and 0.835, respectively), which indicated that ProGRP was the most efficient marker for identifying SCLC. Besides, ProGRP and NSE exhibited almost equivalent diagnostic performance in discriminating SCLC from benign diseases. As for squamous cell carcinoma, we recommended proGRP, while for adenocarcinoma, the combination of proGRP and CEA was preferred. Remarkably, when ProGRP ⩽ 66 pg/mL, CEA was of great value in diagnosing SCLC and adenocarcinoma. If CEA ⩽ 5 ng/mL, the patient was at higher risk for SCLC, whereas the patient was more likely to be diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. Our study provided promising information about the diagnostic values of serum ProGRP, NSE, CEA in distinguishing SCLC from benign pulmonary diseases and NSCLC, which was of crucial clinical significance in the early diagnosis and therapy of SCLC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bio-X Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bio-X Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JBR.0000000000000002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bio-X Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JBR.0000000000000002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

肺癌是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因。主要包括2种组织学类型:小细胞肺癌(SCLC)和非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC,包括鳞状细胞癌和腺癌)。本研究旨在探讨血清原胃泌素释放肽(ProGRP)、神经元特异性烯醇酶(NSE)和癌胚抗原(CEA)及其联合检测在肺癌(特别是SCLC)的组织学诊断中的作用,这对肺癌的开始治疗和预后具有重要意义。采用电化学发光免疫分析法(ECLIA)测定66例SCLC患者、73例腺癌患者、44例鳞状细胞癌患者、45例非恶性肺部疾病患者和50例健康对照者的血清ProGRP、NSE和CEA。构建受试者工作特征曲线,比较各生化指标及其联合检测模型对不同组织学组肺癌患者、肺部良性疾病患者和健康个体的预测能力。在ECLIA检测系统中,ProGRP诊断SCLC的敏感性为71.2%,特异性为91.1% ~ 93.2%。其中,ProGRP鉴别SCLC与肺部良性疾病、鳞状细胞癌和腺癌的roc下面积最大(分别为0.815、0.859和0.835),提示ProGRP是鉴别SCLC最有效的标志物。此外,ProGRP和NSE在区分SCLC和良性疾病方面表现出几乎相同的诊断性能。对于鳞状细胞癌,我们推荐proGRP,对于腺癌,我们推荐proGRP联合CEA。值得注意的是,当ProGRP≥66 pg/mL时,CEA对SCLC和腺癌的诊断具有重要价值。如果CEA≥5 ng/mL,则患者患SCLC的风险较高,而患者更有可能被诊断为腺癌。我们的研究为血清ProGRP、NSE、CEA在区分SCLC与良性肺部疾病和非小细胞肺癌中的诊断价值提供了有希望的信息,这对SCLC的早期诊断和治疗具有重要的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Choice of serum tumor markers in patients with small cell lung cancer: progastrin-releasing peptide, neuron-specific enolase, and carcinoembryonic antigen
Abstract Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. It mainly consists of 2 histological types: small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, including squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma). The present study aimed to assess the role of serum progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and their combinations in the histological diagnosis of lung cancer (specially SCLC), which is of great importance for the initiation of treatment and prognostic implications. Serum ProGRP, NSE, and CEA were determined by the electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) in 66 patients with SCLC, 73 with adenocarcinoma, 44 with squamous cell carcinoma, 45 with non-malignant pulmonary diseases, and 50 healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to compare the predictive ability of each biochemical marker and their combined detection models to discriminate among the patients with lung cancers of different histological groups, benign pulmonary diseases and healthy individuals. In the ECLIA detection system, ProGRP showed the sensitivity and specificity for SCLC diagnosis were 71.2% and 91.1% to 93.2%, respectively. Among the markers, the largest area under the ROCs was for ProGRP in discriminating SCLC from benign pulmonary diseases, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma (0.815, 0.859, and 0.835, respectively), which indicated that ProGRP was the most efficient marker for identifying SCLC. Besides, ProGRP and NSE exhibited almost equivalent diagnostic performance in discriminating SCLC from benign diseases. As for squamous cell carcinoma, we recommended proGRP, while for adenocarcinoma, the combination of proGRP and CEA was preferred. Remarkably, when ProGRP ⩽ 66 pg/mL, CEA was of great value in diagnosing SCLC and adenocarcinoma. If CEA ⩽ 5 ng/mL, the patient was at higher risk for SCLC, whereas the patient was more likely to be diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. Our study provided promising information about the diagnostic values of serum ProGRP, NSE, CEA in distinguishing SCLC from benign pulmonary diseases and NSCLC, which was of crucial clinical significance in the early diagnosis and therapy of SCLC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acquired pure red cell aplasia: unraveling the immune pathogenesis A brief overview of game-changing genetic engineering projects A new “single” era of biomedicine and implications in disease research Natural therapeutics for cancer treatment: success, challenges, and prospect Protein engineering for natural product biosynthesis: expanding diversity for therapeutic applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1