蜂窝结构在静载荷和冲击载荷下的分析

J. Sanchaniya, S. Kanukuntla, A. Dutta, Vladislavs Jevstignejevs
{"title":"蜂窝结构在静载荷和冲击载荷下的分析","authors":"J. Sanchaniya, S. Kanukuntla, A. Dutta, Vladislavs Jevstignejevs","doi":"10.22616/erdev.2022.21.tf228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The aim of this research is to analyse the theory of honeycomb structures, their pros and cons among other structures. To implement it in the physical realm, a honeycomb structure was analysed and evaluated with various modifications in SolidWorks to determine the efficiency of the structure. Honeycomb structures were evaluated for static structural and deformation with varied inclinations to the perpendicular axis to the base, and it was determined that the original structure was the most efficient, as it suffered the minimum stress of all the structures. Different cell geometries, such as triangles, squares, and pentagons, were tested, and it was discovered that the hexagonal structure had the best strength-to-weight ratio of all the configurations. For further analysis, the hexagon cell geometry was changed by adding chamfers and inner radius to see if there were any differences in the overall structure. It was found that the construction with a radius of 0.5 mm was more efficient at managing stress than the original structure due to its higher stress to weight ratio. The structure was optimised, and a model was built. The findings indicate that the optimised structure with the inner radius had a strength/weight ratio of 4.3% more than the original structure. The stress after impact test revealed a 5% reduction in stress compared to the original construction. The displacement was also determined using the static structural analysis of the same weight and was found to be less than 4% of the original structure.","PeriodicalId":244107,"journal":{"name":"21st International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development Proceedings","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of honeycomb structure evaluated in static and impact loading\",\"authors\":\"J. Sanchaniya, S. Kanukuntla, A. Dutta, Vladislavs Jevstignejevs\",\"doi\":\"10.22616/erdev.2022.21.tf228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". The aim of this research is to analyse the theory of honeycomb structures, their pros and cons among other structures. To implement it in the physical realm, a honeycomb structure was analysed and evaluated with various modifications in SolidWorks to determine the efficiency of the structure. Honeycomb structures were evaluated for static structural and deformation with varied inclinations to the perpendicular axis to the base, and it was determined that the original structure was the most efficient, as it suffered the minimum stress of all the structures. Different cell geometries, such as triangles, squares, and pentagons, were tested, and it was discovered that the hexagonal structure had the best strength-to-weight ratio of all the configurations. For further analysis, the hexagon cell geometry was changed by adding chamfers and inner radius to see if there were any differences in the overall structure. It was found that the construction with a radius of 0.5 mm was more efficient at managing stress than the original structure due to its higher stress to weight ratio. The structure was optimised, and a model was built. The findings indicate that the optimised structure with the inner radius had a strength/weight ratio of 4.3% more than the original structure. The stress after impact test revealed a 5% reduction in stress compared to the original construction. The displacement was also determined using the static structural analysis of the same weight and was found to be less than 4% of the original structure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":244107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"21st International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"2014 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"21st International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22616/erdev.2022.21.tf228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"21st International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22616/erdev.2022.21.tf228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

. 本研究的目的是分析蜂窝结构的理论,以及它们在其他结构中的优缺点。为了在物理领域实现它,在SolidWorks中对蜂窝结构进行了分析和评估,并进行了各种修改,以确定结构的效率。对蜂窝结构的静力结构和变形进行了评估,并对不同倾角的蜂窝结构进行了分析,结果表明,蜂窝结构在所有结构中承受的应力最小,是最有效的。测试了不同的单元几何形状,如三角形、正方形和五边形,发现六边形结构在所有构型中具有最佳的强度重量比。为了进一步分析,通过添加倒角和内半径来改变六边形细胞的几何形状,以查看整体结构是否有任何差异。研究发现,半径为0.5 mm的结构由于其较高的应力重量比,在管理应力方面比原结构更有效。对结构进行了优化,并建立了模型。结果表明,优化后的内半径结构的强度/重量比比原结构提高了4.3%。冲击试验后的应力显示,与原始结构相比,应力降低了5%。位移也采用静力结构分析相同重量确定,发现小于原结构的4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of honeycomb structure evaluated in static and impact loading
. The aim of this research is to analyse the theory of honeycomb structures, their pros and cons among other structures. To implement it in the physical realm, a honeycomb structure was analysed and evaluated with various modifications in SolidWorks to determine the efficiency of the structure. Honeycomb structures were evaluated for static structural and deformation with varied inclinations to the perpendicular axis to the base, and it was determined that the original structure was the most efficient, as it suffered the minimum stress of all the structures. Different cell geometries, such as triangles, squares, and pentagons, were tested, and it was discovered that the hexagonal structure had the best strength-to-weight ratio of all the configurations. For further analysis, the hexagon cell geometry was changed by adding chamfers and inner radius to see if there were any differences in the overall structure. It was found that the construction with a radius of 0.5 mm was more efficient at managing stress than the original structure due to its higher stress to weight ratio. The structure was optimised, and a model was built. The findings indicate that the optimised structure with the inner radius had a strength/weight ratio of 4.3% more than the original structure. The stress after impact test revealed a 5% reduction in stress compared to the original construction. The displacement was also determined using the static structural analysis of the same weight and was found to be less than 4% of the original structure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Possibilities for improvement of plant nutrient management in biogas plants in Latvia Types of CO2 emission reduction technologies and future development trends Anaerobic fermentation of kitchen waste Influence of oxygen content in medium carbon steel on bending fatigue strength Finite element analysis of stainless steel AISI 420 cutting process to predict cutting forces and temperature distribution in duratomic-coated cutting tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1