为医学循证教育开发电子资源评估框架

زینب محمدزاده, الهام مسرت, سمیه داودی, سیمین طیاری, ندا شایان, نیلوفر ولیزاده
{"title":"为医学循证教育开发电子资源评估框架","authors":"زینب محمدزاده, الهام مسرت, سمیه داودی, سیمین طیاری, ندا شایان, نیلوفر ولیزاده","doi":"10.29252/JMIS.6.3.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Evidence-based education is the use of the best scientific evidence in all aspects of education and integration of professional knowledge with empirical evidence in education. There is little desire to use electronic evidence in education for reasons such as lack of access to credible scientific resources and lack of time. The purpose of this study was to design an electronic resources evaluation framework for evidence-based education in medical sciences. Methods: This applied descriptive study was performed by Delphi method. The statistical population consisted of 12 specialists in evidence-based medicine, medical education, social medicine, medical librarianship and information, medical informatics and health information management of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and some other universities. The data collection tool was a researcher-made checklist. The Excel software was used for analyzing the data and CVR and CVI indices were calculated for each data set. Results: Finally, of 182 criteria in the initial checklist, 60 criteria were approved by experts and entered the framework. The criteria related to the recovery and website services received the highest score by the specialists. The criteria of coverage, efficiency, hyperlink and guideline were omitted from the final framework due to not obtaining the required score. Conclusion: The present study resulted in developing a framework of criteria for evaluating electronic resources of evidence-based education with 60 criteria for evaluating electronic resources of evidence-based education in medical sciences.","PeriodicalId":231482,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing an electronic resources evaluation framework for evidence-based education in medical sciences\",\"authors\":\"زینب محمدزاده, الهام مسرت, سمیه داودی, سیمین طیاری, ندا شایان, نیلوفر ولیزاده\",\"doi\":\"10.29252/JMIS.6.3.52\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Evidence-based education is the use of the best scientific evidence in all aspects of education and integration of professional knowledge with empirical evidence in education. There is little desire to use electronic evidence in education for reasons such as lack of access to credible scientific resources and lack of time. The purpose of this study was to design an electronic resources evaluation framework for evidence-based education in medical sciences. Methods: This applied descriptive study was performed by Delphi method. The statistical population consisted of 12 specialists in evidence-based medicine, medical education, social medicine, medical librarianship and information, medical informatics and health information management of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and some other universities. The data collection tool was a researcher-made checklist. The Excel software was used for analyzing the data and CVR and CVI indices were calculated for each data set. Results: Finally, of 182 criteria in the initial checklist, 60 criteria were approved by experts and entered the framework. The criteria related to the recovery and website services received the highest score by the specialists. The criteria of coverage, efficiency, hyperlink and guideline were omitted from the final framework due to not obtaining the required score. Conclusion: The present study resulted in developing a framework of criteria for evaluating electronic resources of evidence-based education with 60 criteria for evaluating electronic resources of evidence-based education in medical sciences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29252/JMIS.6.3.52\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Medical Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/JMIS.6.3.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:循证教育是在教育的各个方面运用最好的科学证据,将专业知识与经验证据相结合。由于缺乏获得可靠科学资源的途径和缺乏时间等原因,人们很少希望在教育中使用电子证据。本研究的目的是为医学循证教育设计一个电子资源评估框架。方法:采用德尔菲法进行应用描述性研究。统计人口包括大不里士医科大学和其他一些大学的循证医学、医学教育、社会医学、医学图书馆和信息、医学信息学和卫生信息管理方面的12名专家。数据收集工具是研究人员制作的清单。采用Excel软件对数据进行分析,计算各数据集的CVR和CVI指数。结果:最终,在初始清单中的182个标准中,有60个标准经专家批准进入框架。专家们在与恢复和网站服务有关的标准方面得分最高。覆盖、效率、超链接和指南标准因未获得要求的分数而从最终框架中省略。结论:本研究建立了循证教育电子资源评价标准框架,包含60项医学循证教育电子资源评价标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing an electronic resources evaluation framework for evidence-based education in medical sciences
Aim: Evidence-based education is the use of the best scientific evidence in all aspects of education and integration of professional knowledge with empirical evidence in education. There is little desire to use electronic evidence in education for reasons such as lack of access to credible scientific resources and lack of time. The purpose of this study was to design an electronic resources evaluation framework for evidence-based education in medical sciences. Methods: This applied descriptive study was performed by Delphi method. The statistical population consisted of 12 specialists in evidence-based medicine, medical education, social medicine, medical librarianship and information, medical informatics and health information management of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and some other universities. The data collection tool was a researcher-made checklist. The Excel software was used for analyzing the data and CVR and CVI indices were calculated for each data set. Results: Finally, of 182 criteria in the initial checklist, 60 criteria were approved by experts and entered the framework. The criteria related to the recovery and website services received the highest score by the specialists. The criteria of coverage, efficiency, hyperlink and guideline were omitted from the final framework due to not obtaining the required score. Conclusion: The present study resulted in developing a framework of criteria for evaluating electronic resources of evidence-based education with 60 criteria for evaluating electronic resources of evidence-based education in medical sciences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recognizing the factors affecting the satisfaction of students of Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences: A qualitative study Advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation updates 2020: a narrative review Design and implementation of tools for rapid assessment of the status of documentation of emergency department' physicians The acceptance model of e-learning during the coronavirus pandemic Investigating Barriers and Providing an Appropriate Model for Establishing Total Quality Management: A Case Study in Hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1