在荷兰政府上下文中用于业务规则管理的验证功能

K. Smit, M. Zoet, M. Berkhout
{"title":"在荷兰政府上下文中用于业务规则管理的验证功能","authors":"K. Smit, M. Zoet, M. Berkhout","doi":"10.1109/ICRIIS.2017.8002499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The management of business decisions and business logic play a critical role in an organization's daily activities. As laws, regulations and/or internal policies need to be translated into logically correct business decisions and business logic it is essential to govern and guard the logical soundness of the business decisions and business logic specified. This capability is often referred to as verification. However, the current knowledge base regarding verification as a capability is not yet researched in relation to the new Decision Model and Notation standard, developed by the Object Management Group to model and execute decisions and underlying business logic. The purpose of this paper is to identify which verification capabilities are applied in the Dutch governmental context. To identify the different verification capabilities, we conducted a three-round focus group, which led to a collection of 28 verification capabilities. Furthermore, we aimed to adequately specify each of those capabilities by demonstrating them with real-life case examples. The identified verification capabilities provide a framework to take into account when designing business rules management solutions.","PeriodicalId":384130,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verification capabilities for business rules management in the Dutch governmental context\",\"authors\":\"K. Smit, M. Zoet, M. Berkhout\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICRIIS.2017.8002499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The management of business decisions and business logic play a critical role in an organization's daily activities. As laws, regulations and/or internal policies need to be translated into logically correct business decisions and business logic it is essential to govern and guard the logical soundness of the business decisions and business logic specified. This capability is often referred to as verification. However, the current knowledge base regarding verification as a capability is not yet researched in relation to the new Decision Model and Notation standard, developed by the Object Management Group to model and execute decisions and underlying business logic. The purpose of this paper is to identify which verification capabilities are applied in the Dutch governmental context. To identify the different verification capabilities, we conducted a three-round focus group, which led to a collection of 28 verification capabilities. Furthermore, we aimed to adequately specify each of those capabilities by demonstrating them with real-life case examples. The identified verification capabilities provide a framework to take into account when designing business rules management solutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":384130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRIIS.2017.8002499\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems (ICRIIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRIIS.2017.8002499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

业务决策和业务逻辑的管理在组织的日常活动中起着关键作用。由于需要将法律、法规和/或内部策略转换为逻辑正确的业务决策和业务逻辑,因此必须治理和保护所指定的业务决策和业务逻辑的逻辑健全性。这种能力通常被称为验证。然而,将验证作为一种能力的当前知识库还没有研究与新的决策模型和符号标准的关系,该标准是由对象管理组开发的,用于建模和执行决策和底层业务逻辑。本文的目的是确定在荷兰政府环境中应用了哪些核查能力。为了确定不同的验证能力,我们进行了三轮焦点小组讨论,这导致了28个验证能力的集合。此外,我们的目标是通过使用现实生活中的案例进行演示来充分指定这些功能。确定的验证功能提供了在设计业务规则管理解决方案时要考虑的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Verification capabilities for business rules management in the Dutch governmental context
The management of business decisions and business logic play a critical role in an organization's daily activities. As laws, regulations and/or internal policies need to be translated into logically correct business decisions and business logic it is essential to govern and guard the logical soundness of the business decisions and business logic specified. This capability is often referred to as verification. However, the current knowledge base regarding verification as a capability is not yet researched in relation to the new Decision Model and Notation standard, developed by the Object Management Group to model and execute decisions and underlying business logic. The purpose of this paper is to identify which verification capabilities are applied in the Dutch governmental context. To identify the different verification capabilities, we conducted a three-round focus group, which led to a collection of 28 verification capabilities. Furthermore, we aimed to adequately specify each of those capabilities by demonstrating them with real-life case examples. The identified verification capabilities provide a framework to take into account when designing business rules management solutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A firm and individual characteristic-based prediction model for E2.0 continuance adoption Understanding knowledge management behavior from a social exchange perspective Healthcare employees' perception on information privacy concerns Detection and prevention of possible unauthorized login attempts through stolen credentials from a phishing attack in an online banking system Resolving data duplication, inaccuracy and inconsistency issues using Master Data Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1