{"title":"对“Nist专家敦促谨慎使用法庭证据呈现方法”的回应","authors":"G. Morrison","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3054092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A press release from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)could potentially impede progress toward improving the analysis of forensic evidence and the presentation of forensic analysis results in courts in the United States and around the world. \"NIST experts urge caution in use of courtroom evidence presentation method\" was released on October 12, 2017, and was picked up by the this http URL news service. It argues that, except in exceptional cases, the results of forensic analyses should not be reported as \"likelihood ratios\". The press release, and the journal article by NIST researchers Steven P. Lund & Harri Iyer on which it is based, identifies some legitimate points of concern, but makes a strawman argument and reaches an unjustified conclusion that throws the baby out with the bathwater.","PeriodicalId":409996,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Applications","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Response to: 'Nist Experts Urge Caution in Use of Courtroom Evidence Presentation Method'\",\"authors\":\"G. Morrison\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3054092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A press release from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)could potentially impede progress toward improving the analysis of forensic evidence and the presentation of forensic analysis results in courts in the United States and around the world. \\\"NIST experts urge caution in use of courtroom evidence presentation method\\\" was released on October 12, 2017, and was picked up by the this http URL news service. It argues that, except in exceptional cases, the results of forensic analyses should not be reported as \\\"likelihood ratios\\\". The press release, and the journal article by NIST researchers Steven P. Lund & Harri Iyer on which it is based, identifies some legitimate points of concern, but makes a strawman argument and reaches an unjustified conclusion that throws the baby out with the bathwater.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: Applications\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3054092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3054092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
美国国家标准与技术研究所(NIST)发布的一份新闻稿可能会阻碍美国和世界各地法庭对法医证据分析的改进和法医分析结果的呈现。2017年10月12日,美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)专家敦促谨慎使用法庭证据展示方法,并被本网站转载。它认为,除特殊情况外,法医分析的结果不应以“可能性比”报告。这份新闻稿,以及NIST研究人员Steven P. Lund和Harri Iyer在杂志上发表的文章,是该报告的基础,指出了一些合理的担忧点,但提出了一个吸管人的论点,得出了一个不合理的结论,把婴儿和洗澡水一起倒掉了。
A Response to: 'Nist Experts Urge Caution in Use of Courtroom Evidence Presentation Method'
A press release from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)could potentially impede progress toward improving the analysis of forensic evidence and the presentation of forensic analysis results in courts in the United States and around the world. "NIST experts urge caution in use of courtroom evidence presentation method" was released on October 12, 2017, and was picked up by the this http URL news service. It argues that, except in exceptional cases, the results of forensic analyses should not be reported as "likelihood ratios". The press release, and the journal article by NIST researchers Steven P. Lund & Harri Iyer on which it is based, identifies some legitimate points of concern, but makes a strawman argument and reaches an unjustified conclusion that throws the baby out with the bathwater.