对“Nist专家敦促谨慎使用法庭证据呈现方法”的回应

G. Morrison
{"title":"对“Nist专家敦促谨慎使用法庭证据呈现方法”的回应","authors":"G. Morrison","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3054092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A press release from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)could potentially impede progress toward improving the analysis of forensic evidence and the presentation of forensic analysis results in courts in the United States and around the world. \"NIST experts urge caution in use of courtroom evidence presentation method\" was released on October 12, 2017, and was picked up by the this http URL news service. It argues that, except in exceptional cases, the results of forensic analyses should not be reported as \"likelihood ratios\". The press release, and the journal article by NIST researchers Steven P. Lund & Harri Iyer on which it is based, identifies some legitimate points of concern, but makes a strawman argument and reaches an unjustified conclusion that throws the baby out with the bathwater.","PeriodicalId":409996,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Applications","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Response to: 'Nist Experts Urge Caution in Use of Courtroom Evidence Presentation Method'\",\"authors\":\"G. Morrison\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3054092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A press release from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)could potentially impede progress toward improving the analysis of forensic evidence and the presentation of forensic analysis results in courts in the United States and around the world. \\\"NIST experts urge caution in use of courtroom evidence presentation method\\\" was released on October 12, 2017, and was picked up by the this http URL news service. It argues that, except in exceptional cases, the results of forensic analyses should not be reported as \\\"likelihood ratios\\\". The press release, and the journal article by NIST researchers Steven P. Lund & Harri Iyer on which it is based, identifies some legitimate points of concern, but makes a strawman argument and reaches an unjustified conclusion that throws the baby out with the bathwater.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: Applications\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3054092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3054092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

美国国家标准与技术研究所(NIST)发布的一份新闻稿可能会阻碍美国和世界各地法庭对法医证据分析的改进和法医分析结果的呈现。2017年10月12日,美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)专家敦促谨慎使用法庭证据展示方法,并被本网站转载。它认为,除特殊情况外,法医分析的结果不应以“可能性比”报告。这份新闻稿,以及NIST研究人员Steven P. Lund和Harri Iyer在杂志上发表的文章,是该报告的基础,指出了一些合理的担忧点,但提出了一个吸管人的论点,得出了一个不合理的结论,把婴儿和洗澡水一起倒掉了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Response to: 'Nist Experts Urge Caution in Use of Courtroom Evidence Presentation Method'
A press release from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)could potentially impede progress toward improving the analysis of forensic evidence and the presentation of forensic analysis results in courts in the United States and around the world. "NIST experts urge caution in use of courtroom evidence presentation method" was released on October 12, 2017, and was picked up by the this http URL news service. It argues that, except in exceptional cases, the results of forensic analyses should not be reported as "likelihood ratios". The press release, and the journal article by NIST researchers Steven P. Lund & Harri Iyer on which it is based, identifies some legitimate points of concern, but makes a strawman argument and reaches an unjustified conclusion that throws the baby out with the bathwater.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Weekly Bayesian Modelling Strategy to Predict Deaths by COVID-19: a Model and Case Study for the State of Santa Catarina, Brazil Selecting the Most Effective Nudge: Evidence from a Large-Scale Experiment on Immunization Revealing the Transmission Dynamics of COVID-19: A Bayesian Framework for Rt Estimation Improving living biomass C-stock loss estimates by combining optical satellite, airborne laser scanning, and NFI data Bayesian classification for dating archaeological sites via projectile points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1