{"title":"分布式Graphplan","authors":"M. Iwen, A. Mali","doi":"10.1109/TAI.2002.1180798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Significant advances in plan synthesis under classical assumptions have occurred in the last seven years. Such efficient planners are all centralized planners. One very major development among these is the Graphplan planner. Its popularity is clear from its several efficient adaptations/extensions. Since several practical planning problems are solved in a distributed manner it is important to adapt Graphplan to distributed planning. This involves dealing with significant challenges like decomposing the goal and set of actions without losing completeness. We report two sound two-agent planners DGP (distributed Graphplan) and IG-DGP (interaction graph-based DGP). Decomposition of goal and action set in DGP is carried out manually and in IG-DGP it is carried out automatically based on a new representation called interaction graphs. Our empirical evaluation shows that both these distributed planners are faster than Graphplan. IG-DGP is orders of magnitude faster than Graphplan. IG-DGP benefits significantly from interaction graphs which allow decomposition of a problem into fully independent subproblems under certain conditions. IG-DGP is a hybrid planner in which a centralized planner processes a problem until it becomes separable into two independent subproblems that are passed to a distributed planner This paper also shows that advances in centralized planning can significantly benefit distributed planners.","PeriodicalId":197064,"journal":{"name":"14th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 2002. (ICTAI 2002). Proceedings.","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distributed Graphplan\",\"authors\":\"M. Iwen, A. Mali\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TAI.2002.1180798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Significant advances in plan synthesis under classical assumptions have occurred in the last seven years. Such efficient planners are all centralized planners. One very major development among these is the Graphplan planner. Its popularity is clear from its several efficient adaptations/extensions. Since several practical planning problems are solved in a distributed manner it is important to adapt Graphplan to distributed planning. This involves dealing with significant challenges like decomposing the goal and set of actions without losing completeness. We report two sound two-agent planners DGP (distributed Graphplan) and IG-DGP (interaction graph-based DGP). Decomposition of goal and action set in DGP is carried out manually and in IG-DGP it is carried out automatically based on a new representation called interaction graphs. Our empirical evaluation shows that both these distributed planners are faster than Graphplan. IG-DGP is orders of magnitude faster than Graphplan. IG-DGP benefits significantly from interaction graphs which allow decomposition of a problem into fully independent subproblems under certain conditions. IG-DGP is a hybrid planner in which a centralized planner processes a problem until it becomes separable into two independent subproblems that are passed to a distributed planner This paper also shows that advances in centralized planning can significantly benefit distributed planners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"14th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 2002. (ICTAI 2002). Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"14th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 2002. (ICTAI 2002). Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.2002.1180798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"14th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 2002. (ICTAI 2002). Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.2002.1180798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

在过去七年中,在经典假设下的计划综合方面取得了重大进展。这些有效率的计划者都是集中的计划者。其中一个非常重要的发展是Graphplan规划器。它的受欢迎程度可以从它的几个有效的改编/扩展中看出。由于一些实际的规划问题是以分布式的方式解决的,因此使Graphplan适应分布式规划是很重要的。这涉及到处理重大挑战,如分解目标和行动集,而不失去完整性。我们报告了两个健全的双智能规划者DGP(分布式图计划)和IG-DGP(基于交互图的DGP)。在DGP中,目标和行动集的分解是手动进行的,而在IG-DGP中,目标和行动集的分解是基于一种称为交互图的新表示自动进行的。我们的经验评估表明,这两种分布式规划器都比Graphplan更快。IG-DGP比Graphplan快几个数量级。IG-DGP显著受益于交互图,它允许在某些条件下将问题分解为完全独立的子问题。igg - dgp是一种混合型规划器,其中集中式规划器处理一个问题,直到它变成两个独立的子问题,然后传递给分布式规划器。本文还表明,集中式规划的进步可以显著地使分布式规划器受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Distributed Graphplan
Significant advances in plan synthesis under classical assumptions have occurred in the last seven years. Such efficient planners are all centralized planners. One very major development among these is the Graphplan planner. Its popularity is clear from its several efficient adaptations/extensions. Since several practical planning problems are solved in a distributed manner it is important to adapt Graphplan to distributed planning. This involves dealing with significant challenges like decomposing the goal and set of actions without losing completeness. We report two sound two-agent planners DGP (distributed Graphplan) and IG-DGP (interaction graph-based DGP). Decomposition of goal and action set in DGP is carried out manually and in IG-DGP it is carried out automatically based on a new representation called interaction graphs. Our empirical evaluation shows that both these distributed planners are faster than Graphplan. IG-DGP is orders of magnitude faster than Graphplan. IG-DGP benefits significantly from interaction graphs which allow decomposition of a problem into fully independent subproblems under certain conditions. IG-DGP is a hybrid planner in which a centralized planner processes a problem until it becomes separable into two independent subproblems that are passed to a distributed planner This paper also shows that advances in centralized planning can significantly benefit distributed planners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Machine learning for software engineering: case studies in software reuse Active tracking and cloning of facial expressions using spatio-temporal information Fusing cooperative technical-specification knowledge components Ontology construction for information selection An intelligent brokering system to support multi-agent Web-based 4/sup th/-party logistics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1