从基于实践的研究中理解开放式创新

E. R. Lins, Bárbara do Nascimento Alves, José Lindenberg Julião Xavier Filho, Elisabeth Cavalcante dos Santos
{"title":"从基于实践的研究中理解开放式创新","authors":"E. R. Lins, Bárbara do Nascimento Alves, José Lindenberg Julião Xavier Filho, Elisabeth Cavalcante dos Santos","doi":"10.53706/gep.v.21.6268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This theoretical essay aims to investigate how Practice-Based Studies (PBS) contribute to the understanding of Open Innovation (OI). We used a literature review about these themes. We sought to reflect on the assumptions, concepts, definitions and elements that constitute the PBS and OI After studying both approaches, it was possible to verify that OI can be understood through the epistemological assumptions of PBS, considering the great diversity of possible actions involved to OI, organized by structures and surrounded by material arrangements. Possible identified practices are evidenced when considering the search for external knowledge, the interactive relationships between the agents involved, the commercialization of inventions covering the generation and acquisition of ideas, the selection and decision-making practices on the best ideas and partners for the productive arrangements and practices that occurred later, involving planning practices, new techniques, new products and new services.","PeriodicalId":288834,"journal":{"name":"Gestão & Planejamento","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPREENDENDO A INOVAÇÃO ABERTA A PARTIR DOS ESTUDOS BASEADOS EM PRÁTICA\",\"authors\":\"E. R. Lins, Bárbara do Nascimento Alves, José Lindenberg Julião Xavier Filho, Elisabeth Cavalcante dos Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.53706/gep.v.21.6268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This theoretical essay aims to investigate how Practice-Based Studies (PBS) contribute to the understanding of Open Innovation (OI). We used a literature review about these themes. We sought to reflect on the assumptions, concepts, definitions and elements that constitute the PBS and OI After studying both approaches, it was possible to verify that OI can be understood through the epistemological assumptions of PBS, considering the great diversity of possible actions involved to OI, organized by structures and surrounded by material arrangements. Possible identified practices are evidenced when considering the search for external knowledge, the interactive relationships between the agents involved, the commercialization of inventions covering the generation and acquisition of ideas, the selection and decision-making practices on the best ideas and partners for the productive arrangements and practices that occurred later, involving planning practices, new techniques, new products and new services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":288834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gestão & Planejamento\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gestão & Planejamento\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53706/gep.v.21.6268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestão & Planejamento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53706/gep.v.21.6268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇理论论文旨在探讨基于实践的研究(PBS)如何有助于理解开放式创新(OI)。我们使用了关于这些主题的文献综述。我们试图反思构成PBS和OI的假设、概念、定义和要素。在研究了这两种方法之后,考虑到OI所涉及的可能行为的多样性,由结构组织并被物质安排所包围,有可能通过PBS的认识论假设来理解OI。当考虑到外部知识的搜索,所涉及的代理人之间的互动关系,发明的商业化(包括思想的产生和获取),关于生产安排的最佳思想和合作伙伴的选择和决策实践以及后来发生的涉及规划实践,新技术,新产品和新服务的实践时,可能确定的实践得到了证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPREENDENDO A INOVAÇÃO ABERTA A PARTIR DOS ESTUDOS BASEADOS EM PRÁTICA
This theoretical essay aims to investigate how Practice-Based Studies (PBS) contribute to the understanding of Open Innovation (OI). We used a literature review about these themes. We sought to reflect on the assumptions, concepts, definitions and elements that constitute the PBS and OI After studying both approaches, it was possible to verify that OI can be understood through the epistemological assumptions of PBS, considering the great diversity of possible actions involved to OI, organized by structures and surrounded by material arrangements. Possible identified practices are evidenced when considering the search for external knowledge, the interactive relationships between the agents involved, the commercialization of inventions covering the generation and acquisition of ideas, the selection and decision-making practices on the best ideas and partners for the productive arrangements and practices that occurred later, involving planning practices, new techniques, new products and new services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COMPREENDENDO A INOVAÇÃO ABERTA A PARTIR DOS ESTUDOS BASEADOS EM PRÁTICA STAKEHOLDERS' MANAGEMENT CAPACITY IN BRAZILIAN NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS ANÁLISE DA ADESÃO DA RESPONSABILIDADE SOCIAL CORPORATIVA (RSC) EM EMPRESAS DO NOROESTE GAÚCHO OBSOLESCÊNCIA PROGRAMADA E PERCEBIDA: UM LEVANTAMENTO SOBRE A PERCEPÇÃO DO CICLO DE VIDA COM USUÁRIOS DE APARELHOS CELULARES MÍDIA E MANAGEMENT: A (DES)CONSTRUÇÃO SOCIAL DA IMAGEM DE EIKE BATISTA ENQUANTO EXECUTIVO DE SUCESSO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1