肤色界线例外:跨种族收养外国出生和混血儿的黑人儿童

E. Raleigh
{"title":"肤色界线例外:跨种族收养外国出生和混血儿的黑人儿童","authors":"E. Raleigh","doi":"10.5406/WOMGENFAMCOL.4.1.0086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Census data show that the number of transracial adoptive households is rising, but white parents are more likely to adopt Hispanic and Asian children than black children. These demographics provide empirical support for the argument that the color line in the United States is evolving from a white/nonwhite divide toward a black/nonblack one. Yet these racial demarcations treat blacks as a monolithic group and hide the potential for subgroup variation. The purpose of this article is to explore the ways in which white adoptive parents differentiate among black children available for adoption. Specifically, I examine how the adoptions of foreign-born black and of native-born multiracial black children are positioned as distinct from native-born “full” black children. To analyze these questions, I draw on in-depth interviews with adoption professionals who routinely help facilitate transracial adoptions (n=25). I argue foreign-born and biracial black children are seen as the exception to African American exceptionalism—in other words, these children are seen as “not black.” The study concludes with a discussion of implications for child welfare workers and adoptive families.","PeriodicalId":223911,"journal":{"name":"Women, Gender, and Families of Color","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Color Line Exception: The Transracial Adoption of Foreign-born and Biracial Black Children\",\"authors\":\"E. Raleigh\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/WOMGENFAMCOL.4.1.0086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Census data show that the number of transracial adoptive households is rising, but white parents are more likely to adopt Hispanic and Asian children than black children. These demographics provide empirical support for the argument that the color line in the United States is evolving from a white/nonwhite divide toward a black/nonblack one. Yet these racial demarcations treat blacks as a monolithic group and hide the potential for subgroup variation. The purpose of this article is to explore the ways in which white adoptive parents differentiate among black children available for adoption. Specifically, I examine how the adoptions of foreign-born black and of native-born multiracial black children are positioned as distinct from native-born “full” black children. To analyze these questions, I draw on in-depth interviews with adoption professionals who routinely help facilitate transracial adoptions (n=25). I argue foreign-born and biracial black children are seen as the exception to African American exceptionalism—in other words, these children are seen as “not black.” The study concludes with a discussion of implications for child welfare workers and adoptive families.\",\"PeriodicalId\":223911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women, Gender, and Families of Color\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women, Gender, and Families of Color\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/WOMGENFAMCOL.4.1.0086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women, Gender, and Families of Color","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/WOMGENFAMCOL.4.1.0086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

人口普查数据显示,跨种族收养家庭的数量正在上升,但白人父母更有可能收养西班牙裔和亚裔儿童,而不是黑人儿童。这些人口统计数据为以下论点提供了实证支持:美国的肤色界线正在从白人/非白人分界线演变为黑人/非黑人分界线。然而,这些种族划分将黑人视为一个整体群体,并隐藏了子群体变化的可能性。这篇文章的目的是探讨白人养父母在可收养的黑人儿童中区分的方式。具体来说,我研究了外国出生的黑人和本土出生的多种族黑人儿童的收养如何被定位为与本土出生的“完全”黑人儿童不同。为了分析这些问题,我对经常帮助促进跨种族收养的收养专业人士进行了深入采访(n=25)。我认为,在外国出生和混血的黑人孩子被视为非裔美国人例外论的例外——换句话说,这些孩子被视为“非黑人”。该研究最后讨论了对儿童福利工作者和收养家庭的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Color Line Exception: The Transracial Adoption of Foreign-born and Biracial Black Children
Census data show that the number of transracial adoptive households is rising, but white parents are more likely to adopt Hispanic and Asian children than black children. These demographics provide empirical support for the argument that the color line in the United States is evolving from a white/nonwhite divide toward a black/nonblack one. Yet these racial demarcations treat blacks as a monolithic group and hide the potential for subgroup variation. The purpose of this article is to explore the ways in which white adoptive parents differentiate among black children available for adoption. Specifically, I examine how the adoptions of foreign-born black and of native-born multiracial black children are positioned as distinct from native-born “full” black children. To analyze these questions, I draw on in-depth interviews with adoption professionals who routinely help facilitate transracial adoptions (n=25). I argue foreign-born and biracial black children are seen as the exception to African American exceptionalism—in other words, these children are seen as “not black.” The study concludes with a discussion of implications for child welfare workers and adoptive families.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"She's Been Doing Everything Right": Mothers of Color and Economic Violence Erased by Respectability: The Intersections of AIDS, Race, and Gender in Black America Introduction: In memoriam: bell hooks, 1952–2021 Challenging Misrepresentations of Black Womanhood: Media, Literature and Theory Labor Organizer Nannie Helen Burroughs and Her National Training School for Women and Girls
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1