Sysmex CyFlow Counter与BD FACSCanto II +在印尼CD4细胞计数的比较

H. H. Hayuanta, A. Kosasih, Nasuroh Nasuroh
{"title":"Sysmex CyFlow Counter与BD FACSCanto II +在印尼CD4细胞计数的比较","authors":"H. H. Hayuanta, A. Kosasih, Nasuroh Nasuroh","doi":"10.24293/ijcpml.v29i1.1946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CD4 count is essential in evaluating the immunological status of HIV+ patients and the need for prophylaxis therapy + against opportunistic infections. CyFlow Counter is a novel Sysmex instrument to count CD4 cells and reports the results in + + absolute and percentage values (aCD4 , %CD4 ). However, it has not been evaluated in Indonesia. This study aimed to compare the Sysmex CyFlow Counter with BD FACSCanto II. Samples were collected from leftover EDTA blood samples of + + + patients with CD4 count tested in Dharmais Cancer Hospital. The aCD4 and %CD4 from CyFlow Counter were compared against FACSCanto II using correlation, Bland-Altman, and mean difference test. Sensitivity, specificity, and misclassification rates were also analyzed with aCD4+ count threshold of 200 cells/µL. A total of 70 EDTA blood samples from Dharmais + Cancer Hospital were analyzed with BD FACSCanto II and Sysmex CyFlow Counter, with 20 subjects having CD4 count of 150-299 cells/µL, 28 having 300-449 cells/µL, and 22 having 450-550 cells/µL. CyFlow Counter had a good correlation + + with FACSCanto II in aCD4 and %CD4 (r = 0.892 [p=0.000], r=0.955 [p=0.000], respectively). There was no significant mean + + difference between CyFlow Counter and FACSCanto II (p=0.097 for aCD4 and p=0.611 for %CD4 ). Bland-Altman test + results showed a high agreement (94.29%) with a mean difference of -32.29 cells/µL for aCD4 and a high agreement + (98.57%) with a mean difference of -0.76% for %CD4 . Sensitivity, specificity, and total misclassification rates were 83.33%, + 100.00%, and 3.33%, respectively. Sysmex CyFlow Counter CD4 count results were comparable to FACSCanto II.","PeriodicalId":354500,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between Sysmex CyFlow Counter and BD FACSCanto II + for counting CD4 Cells in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"H. H. Hayuanta, A. Kosasih, Nasuroh Nasuroh\",\"doi\":\"10.24293/ijcpml.v29i1.1946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CD4 count is essential in evaluating the immunological status of HIV+ patients and the need for prophylaxis therapy + against opportunistic infections. CyFlow Counter is a novel Sysmex instrument to count CD4 cells and reports the results in + + absolute and percentage values (aCD4 , %CD4 ). However, it has not been evaluated in Indonesia. This study aimed to compare the Sysmex CyFlow Counter with BD FACSCanto II. Samples were collected from leftover EDTA blood samples of + + + patients with CD4 count tested in Dharmais Cancer Hospital. The aCD4 and %CD4 from CyFlow Counter were compared against FACSCanto II using correlation, Bland-Altman, and mean difference test. Sensitivity, specificity, and misclassification rates were also analyzed with aCD4+ count threshold of 200 cells/µL. A total of 70 EDTA blood samples from Dharmais + Cancer Hospital were analyzed with BD FACSCanto II and Sysmex CyFlow Counter, with 20 subjects having CD4 count of 150-299 cells/µL, 28 having 300-449 cells/µL, and 22 having 450-550 cells/µL. CyFlow Counter had a good correlation + + with FACSCanto II in aCD4 and %CD4 (r = 0.892 [p=0.000], r=0.955 [p=0.000], respectively). There was no significant mean + + difference between CyFlow Counter and FACSCanto II (p=0.097 for aCD4 and p=0.611 for %CD4 ). Bland-Altman test + results showed a high agreement (94.29%) with a mean difference of -32.29 cells/µL for aCD4 and a high agreement + (98.57%) with a mean difference of -0.76% for %CD4 . Sensitivity, specificity, and total misclassification rates were 83.33%, + 100.00%, and 3.33%, respectively. Sysmex CyFlow Counter CD4 count results were comparable to FACSCanto II.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v29i1.1946\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Clinical Pathology and Medical Laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24293/ijcpml.v29i1.1946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

CD4计数对于评估HIV+患者的免疫状态和预防机会性感染的必要性至关重要。CyFlow计数器是一种新型的Sysmex仪器,用于计数CD4细胞,并以+ +绝对值和百分比值(aCD4, %CD4)报告结果。然而,在印度尼西亚尚未对其进行评估。本研究旨在比较Sysmex CyFlow计数器与BD FACSCanto II。收集了在达美斯肿瘤医院进行CD4计数检测的+ + +例患者的剩余EDTA血样。将CyFlow Counter的aCD4和%CD4与FACSCanto II进行相关性、Bland-Altman和均差检验比较。以aCD4+计数阈值为200 cells/µL分析灵敏度、特异性和误分类率。使用BD FACSCanto II和Sysmex CyFlow Counter对来自Dharmais + Cancer Hospital的70份EDTA血样进行分析,其中20名受试者CD4计数为150-299个细胞/µL, 28名为300-449个细胞/µL, 22名为450-550个细胞/µL。CyFlow Counter与FACSCanto II在aCD4和%CD4上有良好的相关性(r = 0.892 [p=0.000], r=0.955 [p=0.000])。CyFlow Counter和FACSCanto II之间没有显著的平均值+ +差异(aCD4 p=0.097, %CD4 p=0.611)。Bland-Altman试验+结果显示aCD4的一致性高(94.29%),平均差值为-32.29个细胞/µL; %CD4的一致性高(98.57%),平均差值为-0.76%。敏感性、特异性和总误分率分别为83.33%、+ 100.00%和3.33%。Sysmex CyFlow Counter CD4计数结果与FACSCanto II相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison between Sysmex CyFlow Counter and BD FACSCanto II + for counting CD4 Cells in Indonesia
CD4 count is essential in evaluating the immunological status of HIV+ patients and the need for prophylaxis therapy + against opportunistic infections. CyFlow Counter is a novel Sysmex instrument to count CD4 cells and reports the results in + + absolute and percentage values (aCD4 , %CD4 ). However, it has not been evaluated in Indonesia. This study aimed to compare the Sysmex CyFlow Counter with BD FACSCanto II. Samples were collected from leftover EDTA blood samples of + + + patients with CD4 count tested in Dharmais Cancer Hospital. The aCD4 and %CD4 from CyFlow Counter were compared against FACSCanto II using correlation, Bland-Altman, and mean difference test. Sensitivity, specificity, and misclassification rates were also analyzed with aCD4+ count threshold of 200 cells/µL. A total of 70 EDTA blood samples from Dharmais + Cancer Hospital were analyzed with BD FACSCanto II and Sysmex CyFlow Counter, with 20 subjects having CD4 count of 150-299 cells/µL, 28 having 300-449 cells/µL, and 22 having 450-550 cells/µL. CyFlow Counter had a good correlation + + with FACSCanto II in aCD4 and %CD4 (r = 0.892 [p=0.000], r=0.955 [p=0.000], respectively). There was no significant mean + + difference between CyFlow Counter and FACSCanto II (p=0.097 for aCD4 and p=0.611 for %CD4 ). Bland-Altman test + results showed a high agreement (94.29%) with a mean difference of -32.29 cells/µL for aCD4 and a high agreement + (98.57%) with a mean difference of -0.76% for %CD4 . Sensitivity, specificity, and total misclassification rates were 83.33%, + 100.00%, and 3.33%, respectively. Sysmex CyFlow Counter CD4 count results were comparable to FACSCanto II.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Lateral-flow Nanoparticle Fluorescence Assay and ELISA Method for Interferon-y Release Assay Test Correlation between VCAM-1 Level and Absolute Monocyte Count in Coronary Artery Disease Performance Evaluation of Semi-quantitative Urine Albumin Creatinine Ratio Using Meditape UC-11A Strip Test Risk Factors of Fungal Growth in Sputum Culture from Severe and Critical COVID-19 Patients Analysis of Albumin to Globulin Ratio as A Prognostic Predictor in Lupus Nephritis Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1