约翰·庞弗雷特的《选择》,或《重塑帝国》

F. Năstase
{"title":"约翰·庞弗雷特的《选择》,或《重塑帝国》","authors":"F. Năstase","doi":"10.31178/ubr.11.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper intends to re-read the popular neoclassical poem “The Choice”, written by (the now forgotten) John Pomfret at the dawn of the eighteenth century, and to demonstrate how it both fulfils and subverts several requirements of its genre. The paper contends that eighteenth-century pastoral poetry often served the purpose of recommending, rather than condemning the “vulgar” concerns of public and city life. The poetry of “retirement”, popular in an age of growing commerce, industry and Empire, was meant to assuage the guilt of enterprising spirits and give a gentlemanly varnish to an England hungry for consumption and expansion. While Pomfret’s poem certainly plays its part in such a narrative and comforts the anxieties of a business-oriented society, it also undermines the illusion of its “gentility”, an aspect which will be exposed in a deconstructive close-reading of the text, employing Derrida’s concept of aporia. The paper will also look at the poem from a socio-cultural perspective, relying on the ideas of eighteenth-century scholars such as Ian Watt, John Sitter, Ros Ballaster, Paula R. Backscheider and others.","PeriodicalId":306553,"journal":{"name":"University of Bucharest Review. Literary and Cultural Studies Series","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"John Pomfret’s “The Choice”, or (Re)Inventing Empire\",\"authors\":\"F. Năstase\",\"doi\":\"10.31178/ubr.11.1.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present paper intends to re-read the popular neoclassical poem “The Choice”, written by (the now forgotten) John Pomfret at the dawn of the eighteenth century, and to demonstrate how it both fulfils and subverts several requirements of its genre. The paper contends that eighteenth-century pastoral poetry often served the purpose of recommending, rather than condemning the “vulgar” concerns of public and city life. The poetry of “retirement”, popular in an age of growing commerce, industry and Empire, was meant to assuage the guilt of enterprising spirits and give a gentlemanly varnish to an England hungry for consumption and expansion. While Pomfret’s poem certainly plays its part in such a narrative and comforts the anxieties of a business-oriented society, it also undermines the illusion of its “gentility”, an aspect which will be exposed in a deconstructive close-reading of the text, employing Derrida’s concept of aporia. The paper will also look at the poem from a socio-cultural perspective, relying on the ideas of eighteenth-century scholars such as Ian Watt, John Sitter, Ros Ballaster, Paula R. Backscheider and others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Bucharest Review. Literary and Cultural Studies Series\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Bucharest Review. Literary and Cultural Studies Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31178/ubr.11.1.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Bucharest Review. Literary and Cultural Studies Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31178/ubr.11.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本论文打算重新阅读流行的新古典主义诗歌《选择》,由约翰·庞弗雷特(现已被遗忘)于18世纪初创作,并展示它是如何既满足又颠覆了其流派的几个要求。本文认为,18世纪的田园诗歌往往是为了推荐,而不是谴责公共和城市生活的“庸俗”关注。在商业、工业和帝国不断发展的时代,流行的“退休”诗歌意在减轻进取精神的罪恶感,并给渴望消费和扩张的英国涂上一层绅士的光泽。虽然庞弗雷特的诗在这样的叙述中发挥了作用,安慰了一个以商业为导向的社会的焦虑,但它也破坏了它的“优雅”的幻想,这一点将在解构主义的文本细读中暴露出来,采用德里达的aporia概念。本文还将从社会文化的角度来看待这首诗,依靠18世纪学者的观点,如伊恩·瓦特,约翰·西特,罗斯·巴拉斯特,保拉·r·巴克谢德尔和其他人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
John Pomfret’s “The Choice”, or (Re)Inventing Empire
The present paper intends to re-read the popular neoclassical poem “The Choice”, written by (the now forgotten) John Pomfret at the dawn of the eighteenth century, and to demonstrate how it both fulfils and subverts several requirements of its genre. The paper contends that eighteenth-century pastoral poetry often served the purpose of recommending, rather than condemning the “vulgar” concerns of public and city life. The poetry of “retirement”, popular in an age of growing commerce, industry and Empire, was meant to assuage the guilt of enterprising spirits and give a gentlemanly varnish to an England hungry for consumption and expansion. While Pomfret’s poem certainly plays its part in such a narrative and comforts the anxieties of a business-oriented society, it also undermines the illusion of its “gentility”, an aspect which will be exposed in a deconstructive close-reading of the text, employing Derrida’s concept of aporia. The paper will also look at the poem from a socio-cultural perspective, relying on the ideas of eighteenth-century scholars such as Ian Watt, John Sitter, Ros Ballaster, Paula R. Backscheider and others.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Continuity of Womanist Ethos: Intertextuality in Select Novels of Alice Walker A ‘Palimpestuous’ Reading of Lisa Strøme’s The Strawberry Girl Evelyn Waugh’s War Novels in Francoist Spain Memory and nostalgia: pre-reform Russia in the minds of the Russian nobility of the second half of the 19th century Revising the Black decolonialization process: Kendrick Lamar’s DAMN. and the poetics of violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1