网络流量分类-两种常见决策树方法的比较研究:C4.5和随机森林

Alhamza Munther, Alabass Alalousi, Shahrul Nizam, R. R. Othman, Mohammed Anbar
{"title":"网络流量分类-两种常见决策树方法的比较研究:C4.5和随机森林","authors":"Alhamza Munther, Alabass Alalousi, Shahrul Nizam, R. R. Othman, Mohammed Anbar","doi":"10.1109/ICED.2014.7015800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Network traffic classification gains continuous interesting while many applications emerge on the different kinds of networks with obfuscation techniques. Decision tree is a supervised machine learning method used widely to identify and classify network traffic. In this paper, we introduce a comparative study focusing on two common decision tree methods namely: C4.5 and Random forest. The study offers comparative results in two different factors are accuracy of classification and processing time. C4.5 achieved high percentage of classification accuracy reach to 99.67 for 24000 instances while Random Forest was faster than C4.5 in term of processing time.","PeriodicalId":143806,"journal":{"name":"2014 2nd International Conference on Electronic Design (ICED)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network traffic classification — A comparative study of two common decision tree methods: C4.5 and Random forest\",\"authors\":\"Alhamza Munther, Alabass Alalousi, Shahrul Nizam, R. R. Othman, Mohammed Anbar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICED.2014.7015800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Network traffic classification gains continuous interesting while many applications emerge on the different kinds of networks with obfuscation techniques. Decision tree is a supervised machine learning method used widely to identify and classify network traffic. In this paper, we introduce a comparative study focusing on two common decision tree methods namely: C4.5 and Random forest. The study offers comparative results in two different factors are accuracy of classification and processing time. C4.5 achieved high percentage of classification accuracy reach to 99.67 for 24000 instances while Random Forest was faster than C4.5 in term of processing time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 2nd International Conference on Electronic Design (ICED)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 2nd International Conference on Electronic Design (ICED)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICED.2014.7015800\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 2nd International Conference on Electronic Design (ICED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICED.2014.7015800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

随着混淆技术在不同类型的网络上的应用越来越多,网络流分类问题日益引起人们的关注。决策树是一种被广泛用于网络流量识别和分类的监督机器学习方法。本文对C4.5和随机森林两种常见的决策树方法进行了比较研究。该研究在分类精度和处理时间两个不同的因素上提供了比较结果。C4.5在24000个实例的分类准确率达到99.67,而Random Forest在处理时间上要快于C4.5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Network traffic classification — A comparative study of two common decision tree methods: C4.5 and Random forest
Network traffic classification gains continuous interesting while many applications emerge on the different kinds of networks with obfuscation techniques. Decision tree is a supervised machine learning method used widely to identify and classify network traffic. In this paper, we introduce a comparative study focusing on two common decision tree methods namely: C4.5 and Random forest. The study offers comparative results in two different factors are accuracy of classification and processing time. C4.5 achieved high percentage of classification accuracy reach to 99.67 for 24000 instances while Random Forest was faster than C4.5 in term of processing time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A new trimming approach for shunt resistors used in metering applications Taxanomy and overview on cooperative MAC for vehicular ad hoc networks Electrical characterization of USB2 multiplexers/BC1.2 power switches/charging modules for accurate channel simulation Experimental studies of the correlation between fingers bending angle with voltage outputted from GloveMAP Comparison on TiO2 and TaO2 based bipolar resistive switching devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1