{"title":"2013年《物理学科课程实施》学习成果评价","authors":"Martina Eryyani, A. Kusdiwelirawan","doi":"10.4108/eai.3-6-2021.2310778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This study aims to determine the implementation of the curriculum in schools with curriculum evaluation activities to determine the obstacles and constraints faced by schools so that they can be fixed and smoothen the implementation of the 2013 curriculum in schools. The research method used is qualitative research with a context, input, process, and product (cipp) evaluation model. The technique of collecting data by using triangulation (combined). The results of the 2013 curriculum implementation questionnaire, in 3 (three) schools the percentage of 1 (one) school had a percentage of 76.34%, in 2 (two) schools it was 98.84%, and 3 (three) schools had a percentage of 98.65%. So it can be interpreted that school 2 (two) has a very good implementation of the 2013 curriculum because it has the highest percentage and school 1 (one) has the lowest percentage, which means that it has not fully implemented the 2013 curriculum. Of the three schools, the average percentage is 91.27%. The results of the learning activity questionnaire, in 3 (three) schools the percentage of school 1 (one) had a percentage of 62.82%, in school 2 it was 98.47%, and school 3 had a percentage of 83%. So it can be interpreted that 2 (two) schools have learning activities that are in accordance with the 2013 curriculum because it has the highest percentage and school 1 (one) has the lowest percentage which means that it has not fully implemented learning activities. From the three schools, the average percentage was 81.43%.","PeriodicalId":406252,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education, Humanities, Health and Agriculture, ICEHHA 2021, 3-4 June 2021, Ruteng, Flores, Indonesia","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of 2013 Curriculum Implementation of Physics Subjects Learning Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Martina Eryyani, A. Kusdiwelirawan\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/eai.3-6-2021.2310778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". This study aims to determine the implementation of the curriculum in schools with curriculum evaluation activities to determine the obstacles and constraints faced by schools so that they can be fixed and smoothen the implementation of the 2013 curriculum in schools. The research method used is qualitative research with a context, input, process, and product (cipp) evaluation model. The technique of collecting data by using triangulation (combined). The results of the 2013 curriculum implementation questionnaire, in 3 (three) schools the percentage of 1 (one) school had a percentage of 76.34%, in 2 (two) schools it was 98.84%, and 3 (three) schools had a percentage of 98.65%. So it can be interpreted that school 2 (two) has a very good implementation of the 2013 curriculum because it has the highest percentage and school 1 (one) has the lowest percentage, which means that it has not fully implemented the 2013 curriculum. Of the three schools, the average percentage is 91.27%. The results of the learning activity questionnaire, in 3 (three) schools the percentage of school 1 (one) had a percentage of 62.82%, in school 2 it was 98.47%, and school 3 had a percentage of 83%. So it can be interpreted that 2 (two) schools have learning activities that are in accordance with the 2013 curriculum because it has the highest percentage and school 1 (one) has the lowest percentage which means that it has not fully implemented learning activities. From the three schools, the average percentage was 81.43%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education, Humanities, Health and Agriculture, ICEHHA 2021, 3-4 June 2021, Ruteng, Flores, Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education, Humanities, Health and Agriculture, ICEHHA 2021, 3-4 June 2021, Ruteng, Flores, Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.3-6-2021.2310778\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education, Humanities, Health and Agriculture, ICEHHA 2021, 3-4 June 2021, Ruteng, Flores, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.3-6-2021.2310778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of 2013 Curriculum Implementation of Physics Subjects Learning Outcomes
. This study aims to determine the implementation of the curriculum in schools with curriculum evaluation activities to determine the obstacles and constraints faced by schools so that they can be fixed and smoothen the implementation of the 2013 curriculum in schools. The research method used is qualitative research with a context, input, process, and product (cipp) evaluation model. The technique of collecting data by using triangulation (combined). The results of the 2013 curriculum implementation questionnaire, in 3 (three) schools the percentage of 1 (one) school had a percentage of 76.34%, in 2 (two) schools it was 98.84%, and 3 (three) schools had a percentage of 98.65%. So it can be interpreted that school 2 (two) has a very good implementation of the 2013 curriculum because it has the highest percentage and school 1 (one) has the lowest percentage, which means that it has not fully implemented the 2013 curriculum. Of the three schools, the average percentage is 91.27%. The results of the learning activity questionnaire, in 3 (three) schools the percentage of school 1 (one) had a percentage of 62.82%, in school 2 it was 98.47%, and school 3 had a percentage of 83%. So it can be interpreted that 2 (two) schools have learning activities that are in accordance with the 2013 curriculum because it has the highest percentage and school 1 (one) has the lowest percentage which means that it has not fully implemented learning activities. From the three schools, the average percentage was 81.43%.