二语词汇获取中的自动启动、图式归纳和激活扩散:词汇量和启动深度的差异是否保持不变?

S. Ntim
{"title":"二语词汇获取中的自动启动、图式归纳和激活扩散:词汇量和启动深度的差异是否保持不变?","authors":"S. Ntim","doi":"10.38140/ijspsy.v2i2.716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated automatic priming, schema induction, spread of activation and L2 lexical access through vocabulary size and depth. Employing theoretical framework of the distributed memory representation, the underlying assumption was that conceptual knowledge was identified through connection weights linking processing units that were universal rather than local. Using experimental pre-test-post-test design with purposive sampling of estimated one hundred and fifty (150) students from three (3) Senior High Schools, the critical findings in this study were that cognitive differences in automatic priming, schema induction and spread of activation predicted enhanced reading comprehension in L2, especially how fast one could infer from text since these cognitive processes helped to reduce cognitive load involved in reading. The second finding was that ability to use automatic priming, schema induction and spread of activation reduced mental load to facilitate comprehension by the size and level of vocabulary readers possessed in long-term memory. Third finding was that priming, spread of activation and schema induction increased with increasing attentional control. Readers with high attentional control were more likely to be involved in a proactive expectancy strategic use of priming, spread of activation and schema induction to generate possible targets. These cognitive differences remain invariant in readers, unless classroom practices are deliberately designed to help less enhanced readers strategies to promote schema induction, priming and spread of activation.","PeriodicalId":142287,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Studies in Psychology","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic priming, schema induction and spread of activation in l2 lexical access: Do differences in vocabulary size and depth of priming remain invariant?\",\"authors\":\"S. Ntim\",\"doi\":\"10.38140/ijspsy.v2i2.716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated automatic priming, schema induction, spread of activation and L2 lexical access through vocabulary size and depth. Employing theoretical framework of the distributed memory representation, the underlying assumption was that conceptual knowledge was identified through connection weights linking processing units that were universal rather than local. Using experimental pre-test-post-test design with purposive sampling of estimated one hundred and fifty (150) students from three (3) Senior High Schools, the critical findings in this study were that cognitive differences in automatic priming, schema induction and spread of activation predicted enhanced reading comprehension in L2, especially how fast one could infer from text since these cognitive processes helped to reduce cognitive load involved in reading. The second finding was that ability to use automatic priming, schema induction and spread of activation reduced mental load to facilitate comprehension by the size and level of vocabulary readers possessed in long-term memory. Third finding was that priming, spread of activation and schema induction increased with increasing attentional control. Readers with high attentional control were more likely to be involved in a proactive expectancy strategic use of priming, spread of activation and schema induction to generate possible targets. These cognitive differences remain invariant in readers, unless classroom practices are deliberately designed to help less enhanced readers strategies to promote schema induction, priming and spread of activation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Studies in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Studies in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38140/ijspsy.v2i2.716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Studies in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38140/ijspsy.v2i2.716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过词汇量和词汇深度考察了自动启动、图式归纳、激活扩散和二语词汇获取的关系。采用分布式记忆表示的理论框架,基本假设是概念知识是通过连接通用而非局部处理单元的连接权重来识别的。本研究采用实验前测后测设计,对来自三所高中的150名学生进行了有目的的抽样调查,主要发现在自动启动、图式归纳和激活扩散方面的认知差异预测了第二语言阅读理解能力的提高,尤其是从文本中推断的速度,因为这些认知过程有助于减少阅读中的认知负荷。第二个发现是,使用自动启动、图式归纳和激活扩散的能力,通过长期记忆中词汇量的大小和水平,减少了心理负荷,促进了理解。第三个发现是,启动、激活扩散和图式诱导随着注意力控制的增加而增加。高注意力控制的读者更有可能参与主动期望策略,使用启动、激活扩散和图式归纳来产生可能的目标。这些认知差异在读者中保持不变,除非课堂实践被刻意设计成帮助不太增强的读者策略来促进图式归纳、启动和激活的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Automatic priming, schema induction and spread of activation in l2 lexical access: Do differences in vocabulary size and depth of priming remain invariant?
This study investigated automatic priming, schema induction, spread of activation and L2 lexical access through vocabulary size and depth. Employing theoretical framework of the distributed memory representation, the underlying assumption was that conceptual knowledge was identified through connection weights linking processing units that were universal rather than local. Using experimental pre-test-post-test design with purposive sampling of estimated one hundred and fifty (150) students from three (3) Senior High Schools, the critical findings in this study were that cognitive differences in automatic priming, schema induction and spread of activation predicted enhanced reading comprehension in L2, especially how fast one could infer from text since these cognitive processes helped to reduce cognitive load involved in reading. The second finding was that ability to use automatic priming, schema induction and spread of activation reduced mental load to facilitate comprehension by the size and level of vocabulary readers possessed in long-term memory. Third finding was that priming, spread of activation and schema induction increased with increasing attentional control. Readers with high attentional control were more likely to be involved in a proactive expectancy strategic use of priming, spread of activation and schema induction to generate possible targets. These cognitive differences remain invariant in readers, unless classroom practices are deliberately designed to help less enhanced readers strategies to promote schema induction, priming and spread of activation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Delinquent behaviours influencing learners’ academic achievement at secondary schools in Nemanwa Community, Zimbabwe Exploring barriers to learning hindering Learners with albinism’ academic achievement at schools in the Masvingo district in Zimbabwe Psychosocial factors influencing the academic performance of students at a rural college in the Covid-19 era Challenges of novice teachers in Covid-19 at a rural school in Thabo Mofutsanyane District, South Africa Exploring the understanding of enabling environment for Learners with Special Educational Needs in rural primary schools in Lesotho
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1