{"title":"不可言喻的表达:神学现代主义与勋伯格《摩西与亚伦》中信仰的表达","authors":"Andrew J. Ball","doi":"10.5325/soundings.104.1.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Moses and Aron is indicative of the shift in Schoenberg’s thinking that occurred in the early 1920s. His conflicting aesthetic and religious convictions are embodied in Moses, who reflects Schoenberg’s religious piety, and Aron who represents his devotion to expressionist, Schopenhauerian aesthetics. By revisiting the figures and relationship of Moses and Aron, Schoenberg’s opera examines the possibility of an anti-idolatrous modern work of religious Judaic art. By problematizing the contradiction of creating anti-idolatrous, worshipful Jewish art, Schoenberg foregrounds an aesthetic-theological quandary. How can a Jewish artist represent, not the ineffable— the divine—but ineffability while still adhering to the law of anti-idolatry?","PeriodicalId":231294,"journal":{"name":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":"63 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voicing Ineffability: Theological Modernism and the Expression(ism) of Faith in Schoenberg’s Moses und Aron\",\"authors\":\"Andrew J. Ball\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/soundings.104.1.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Moses and Aron is indicative of the shift in Schoenberg’s thinking that occurred in the early 1920s. His conflicting aesthetic and religious convictions are embodied in Moses, who reflects Schoenberg’s religious piety, and Aron who represents his devotion to expressionist, Schopenhauerian aesthetics. By revisiting the figures and relationship of Moses and Aron, Schoenberg’s opera examines the possibility of an anti-idolatrous modern work of religious Judaic art. By problematizing the contradiction of creating anti-idolatrous, worshipful Jewish art, Schoenberg foregrounds an aesthetic-theological quandary. How can a Jewish artist represent, not the ineffable— the divine—but ineffability while still adhering to the law of anti-idolatry?\",\"PeriodicalId\":231294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal\",\"volume\":\"63 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/soundings.104.1.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/soundings.104.1.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Voicing Ineffability: Theological Modernism and the Expression(ism) of Faith in Schoenberg’s Moses und Aron
Abstract:Moses and Aron is indicative of the shift in Schoenberg’s thinking that occurred in the early 1920s. His conflicting aesthetic and religious convictions are embodied in Moses, who reflects Schoenberg’s religious piety, and Aron who represents his devotion to expressionist, Schopenhauerian aesthetics. By revisiting the figures and relationship of Moses and Aron, Schoenberg’s opera examines the possibility of an anti-idolatrous modern work of religious Judaic art. By problematizing the contradiction of creating anti-idolatrous, worshipful Jewish art, Schoenberg foregrounds an aesthetic-theological quandary. How can a Jewish artist represent, not the ineffable— the divine—but ineffability while still adhering to the law of anti-idolatry?