阴险的、侵入的、看不见的:高等教育中的学术不诚实和持续评估

Parmjit Singh, R. Thambusamy, Zachariah Aidin Druckman
{"title":"阴险的、侵入的、看不见的:高等教育中的学术不诚实和持续评估","authors":"Parmjit Singh, R. Thambusamy, Zachariah Aidin Druckman","doi":"10.15405/EJSBS.193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1.IntroductionDespite every effort made by higher education institution authorities to stamp out Academic Dishonesty (AD), it continues to remain a scourge that threatens the moral and ethical foundations of academic endeavour. The threat of AD is now all the more alarming looking at the statistics of AD prevalent in higher education. According to studies undertaken by the International Centre for Academic Integrity, out of around 70,000 undergraduates and 17,000 graduates who had responded to a survey on AD between 2002 and 2015, a shocking 39% of undergraduates admitted to cheating on tests, while 62% admitted cheating on written assignments. Of the graduate students, 17% admitted cheating on tests, while 40% admitted cheating on written assignments. Graduate students are those engaged in educational pursuits at the master and doctorate levels, which in itself, is even more alarming. The researchers who had also surveyed high school students found that:\"of over 70,000 high school students at over 24 high schools in the United States... 64% admitted to cheating on a test, 58%admitted to plagiarism and 95% said they participated in some form of cheating, whether it was on a test, plagiarism or copying homework. \"(http://www.academicintegrity.org/icai/integrity-3.php) retrieved 9 July 2016This only goes to show that the extent of the insidious nature of this scourge is as deep as it is far reaching; right from school to the highest levels of educational endeavor. Policymakers and stakeholders should take note that this behaviour appears to start at adolescence (high school) which is a notable predictor of the age at which such behaviour starts to rear its ugly head, and devise appropriate and timely interventions to cut off the head of the Hydra before it starts to mutate into multiple heads of unethical behaviours.If the data above is not upsetting enough, it was revealed in a U.S News and World Report that 90% of those polled believed that neither they nor others would be caught for cheating or punished, which means that, in their view, AD would go unpunished. (http://oedb.org/ilibrarian/8-astonishing-stats-on-academic-cheating/ retrieved 9 July 2016).The problem of AD had become endemic enough to have caught the attention of educational institutions and government agencies. For years, AD has been considerably studied and debated (Huang, Yang & Chen, 2015; Desalegn & Berhan, 2014) ) as a topic of concern among university educators. AD, according to Callahan (2004) can be defined as a type of rule-breaking behaviour undertaken by an individual to get ahead of others academically, professionally or financially. That being said, AD is defined as \"a student's use of unauthorized assistance with intent to deceive an instructor or other such person who may be assigned to evaluate the student's work in meeting course and degree requirements,\" (Center for Academic Integrity, Duke University 1999).As mentioned earlier, various studies have been undertaken by researchers across the globe in relation to the prevalence of AD. DuPree and Sattler (2010) reported that based on 1058 students from Texas Tech University, 34% claimed to have \"sometimes cheated in tests or examinations\", while 26.9% claimed to have \"often cheated\" while 11.2% claimed to have \"very often cheated in assessments\". Ahmadi's (2012) study of 132 language students in a university in Iran, revealed that cheating is prevalent 'justified' by various reasons such as \"not being ready for exams\"; \"the difficulty of the exams\"; \"lack of time to study\" and \"careless and lenient instructors.\" A recent study by Desalegn and Berhan (2014) reported that undergraduate medical students in Hawassa, Ethiopia cheated mainly on the entrance examinations and students who cheated in high school had a higher tendency to cheat when entering the university. This finding can be extrapolated to tie in with that of the study mentioned earlier on the report of the cheating among high schools students in the US. …","PeriodicalId":164632,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insidious, Invasive, Invisible: Academic Dishonesty and on-going assessments in higher education\",\"authors\":\"Parmjit Singh, R. Thambusamy, Zachariah Aidin Druckman\",\"doi\":\"10.15405/EJSBS.193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1.IntroductionDespite every effort made by higher education institution authorities to stamp out Academic Dishonesty (AD), it continues to remain a scourge that threatens the moral and ethical foundations of academic endeavour. The threat of AD is now all the more alarming looking at the statistics of AD prevalent in higher education. According to studies undertaken by the International Centre for Academic Integrity, out of around 70,000 undergraduates and 17,000 graduates who had responded to a survey on AD between 2002 and 2015, a shocking 39% of undergraduates admitted to cheating on tests, while 62% admitted cheating on written assignments. Of the graduate students, 17% admitted cheating on tests, while 40% admitted cheating on written assignments. Graduate students are those engaged in educational pursuits at the master and doctorate levels, which in itself, is even more alarming. The researchers who had also surveyed high school students found that:\\\"of over 70,000 high school students at over 24 high schools in the United States... 64% admitted to cheating on a test, 58%admitted to plagiarism and 95% said they participated in some form of cheating, whether it was on a test, plagiarism or copying homework. \\\"(http://www.academicintegrity.org/icai/integrity-3.php) retrieved 9 July 2016This only goes to show that the extent of the insidious nature of this scourge is as deep as it is far reaching; right from school to the highest levels of educational endeavor. Policymakers and stakeholders should take note that this behaviour appears to start at adolescence (high school) which is a notable predictor of the age at which such behaviour starts to rear its ugly head, and devise appropriate and timely interventions to cut off the head of the Hydra before it starts to mutate into multiple heads of unethical behaviours.If the data above is not upsetting enough, it was revealed in a U.S News and World Report that 90% of those polled believed that neither they nor others would be caught for cheating or punished, which means that, in their view, AD would go unpunished. (http://oedb.org/ilibrarian/8-astonishing-stats-on-academic-cheating/ retrieved 9 July 2016).The problem of AD had become endemic enough to have caught the attention of educational institutions and government agencies. For years, AD has been considerably studied and debated (Huang, Yang & Chen, 2015; Desalegn & Berhan, 2014) ) as a topic of concern among university educators. AD, according to Callahan (2004) can be defined as a type of rule-breaking behaviour undertaken by an individual to get ahead of others academically, professionally or financially. That being said, AD is defined as \\\"a student's use of unauthorized assistance with intent to deceive an instructor or other such person who may be assigned to evaluate the student's work in meeting course and degree requirements,\\\" (Center for Academic Integrity, Duke University 1999).As mentioned earlier, various studies have been undertaken by researchers across the globe in relation to the prevalence of AD. DuPree and Sattler (2010) reported that based on 1058 students from Texas Tech University, 34% claimed to have \\\"sometimes cheated in tests or examinations\\\", while 26.9% claimed to have \\\"often cheated\\\" while 11.2% claimed to have \\\"very often cheated in assessments\\\". Ahmadi's (2012) study of 132 language students in a university in Iran, revealed that cheating is prevalent 'justified' by various reasons such as \\\"not being ready for exams\\\"; \\\"the difficulty of the exams\\\"; \\\"lack of time to study\\\" and \\\"careless and lenient instructors.\\\" A recent study by Desalegn and Berhan (2014) reported that undergraduate medical students in Hawassa, Ethiopia cheated mainly on the entrance examinations and students who cheated in high school had a higher tendency to cheat when entering the university. This finding can be extrapolated to tie in with that of the study mentioned earlier on the report of the cheating among high schools students in the US. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":164632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15405/EJSBS.193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15405/EJSBS.193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

1.尽管高等教育机构当局尽了一切努力来消除学术欺诈(AD),但它仍然是威胁学术努力的道德和伦理基础的祸害。从高等教育中普遍存在的阿尔茨海默病的统计数据来看,阿尔茨海默病的威胁更加令人担忧。根据国际学术诚信中心的研究,在2002年至2015年期间,约有7万名本科生和1.7万名毕业生参与了一项关于AD的调查,令人震惊的是,39%的本科生承认在考试中作弊,62%的人承认在书面作业中作弊。在研究生中,17%的人承认在考试中作弊,40%的人承认在书面作业中作弊。研究生是那些从事硕士和博士学位教育的人,这本身就更令人担忧。研究人员还对高中生进行了调查,发现:“在美国24所高中的7万多名高中生中……64%的人承认在考试中作弊,58%的人承认抄袭,95%的人表示他们参与了某种形式的作弊,无论是在考试中,抄袭还是抄袭作业。(http://www.academicintegrity.org/icai/integrity-3.php)检索2016年7月9日这只能表明,这一祸害的阴险性质的程度是深远的;从学校到最高水平的教育努力。政策制定者和利益相关者应该注意到,这种行为似乎始于青春期(高中),这是这种行为开始抬头的一个显著预测因素,并制定适当和及时的干预措施,在九头蛇开始变异成多个不道德行为的头之前切断它的头。如果上面的数据还不够令人沮丧的话,美国新闻与世界报道显示,90%的受访者认为他们和其他人都不会因为作弊而被抓住或受到惩罚,这意味着,在他们看来,AD不会受到惩罚。(http://oedb.org/ilibrarian/8-astonishing-stats-on-academic-cheating/检索于2016年7月9日)。AD的问题已经成为一种地方性问题,引起了教育机构和政府机构的注意。多年来,人们对AD进行了大量的研究和争论(Huang, Yang & Chen, 2015;Desalegn & Berhan, 2014))成为大学教育工作者关注的话题。根据Callahan(2004)的说法,AD可以被定义为个人为了在学术、专业或经济上领先他人而采取的一种违反规则的行为。也就是说,欺诈行为被定义为“学生使用未经授权的帮助,意图欺骗教师或其他可能被分配来评估学生的工作是否符合课程和学位要求的人”(杜克大学学术诚信中心,1999年)。如前所述,全球研究人员对阿尔茨海默病的患病率进行了各种研究。DuPree和Sattler(2010)报告称,基于德克萨斯理工大学1058名学生的调查,34%的学生声称“有时在测试或考试中作弊”,26.9%的学生声称“经常作弊”,11.2%的学生声称“在评估中经常作弊”。Ahmadi(2012)对伊朗一所大学的132名语言专业学生的研究显示,作弊普遍存在的理由有很多,比如“没有为考试做好准备”;“考试的难度”;“没有时间学习”和“老师粗心大意”。Desalegn和Berhan(2014)最近的一项研究报告称,埃塞俄比亚Hawassa的本科医科学生主要在入学考试中作弊,高中作弊的学生在进入大学时作弊的倾向更高。这一发现可以推断为与之前提到的关于美国高中生作弊的研究相联系。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Insidious, Invasive, Invisible: Academic Dishonesty and on-going assessments in higher education
1.IntroductionDespite every effort made by higher education institution authorities to stamp out Academic Dishonesty (AD), it continues to remain a scourge that threatens the moral and ethical foundations of academic endeavour. The threat of AD is now all the more alarming looking at the statistics of AD prevalent in higher education. According to studies undertaken by the International Centre for Academic Integrity, out of around 70,000 undergraduates and 17,000 graduates who had responded to a survey on AD between 2002 and 2015, a shocking 39% of undergraduates admitted to cheating on tests, while 62% admitted cheating on written assignments. Of the graduate students, 17% admitted cheating on tests, while 40% admitted cheating on written assignments. Graduate students are those engaged in educational pursuits at the master and doctorate levels, which in itself, is even more alarming. The researchers who had also surveyed high school students found that:"of over 70,000 high school students at over 24 high schools in the United States... 64% admitted to cheating on a test, 58%admitted to plagiarism and 95% said they participated in some form of cheating, whether it was on a test, plagiarism or copying homework. "(http://www.academicintegrity.org/icai/integrity-3.php) retrieved 9 July 2016This only goes to show that the extent of the insidious nature of this scourge is as deep as it is far reaching; right from school to the highest levels of educational endeavor. Policymakers and stakeholders should take note that this behaviour appears to start at adolescence (high school) which is a notable predictor of the age at which such behaviour starts to rear its ugly head, and devise appropriate and timely interventions to cut off the head of the Hydra before it starts to mutate into multiple heads of unethical behaviours.If the data above is not upsetting enough, it was revealed in a U.S News and World Report that 90% of those polled believed that neither they nor others would be caught for cheating or punished, which means that, in their view, AD would go unpunished. (http://oedb.org/ilibrarian/8-astonishing-stats-on-academic-cheating/ retrieved 9 July 2016).The problem of AD had become endemic enough to have caught the attention of educational institutions and government agencies. For years, AD has been considerably studied and debated (Huang, Yang & Chen, 2015; Desalegn & Berhan, 2014) ) as a topic of concern among university educators. AD, according to Callahan (2004) can be defined as a type of rule-breaking behaviour undertaken by an individual to get ahead of others academically, professionally or financially. That being said, AD is defined as "a student's use of unauthorized assistance with intent to deceive an instructor or other such person who may be assigned to evaluate the student's work in meeting course and degree requirements," (Center for Academic Integrity, Duke University 1999).As mentioned earlier, various studies have been undertaken by researchers across the globe in relation to the prevalence of AD. DuPree and Sattler (2010) reported that based on 1058 students from Texas Tech University, 34% claimed to have "sometimes cheated in tests or examinations", while 26.9% claimed to have "often cheated" while 11.2% claimed to have "very often cheated in assessments". Ahmadi's (2012) study of 132 language students in a university in Iran, revealed that cheating is prevalent 'justified' by various reasons such as "not being ready for exams"; "the difficulty of the exams"; "lack of time to study" and "careless and lenient instructors." A recent study by Desalegn and Berhan (2014) reported that undergraduate medical students in Hawassa, Ethiopia cheated mainly on the entrance examinations and students who cheated in high school had a higher tendency to cheat when entering the university. This finding can be extrapolated to tie in with that of the study mentioned earlier on the report of the cheating among high schools students in the US. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, Attitude and Perceptions towards Basic Life Support Training among Student Teachers in a Malaysian University The Development of Artique - Independent Artists and Online Art Criticism Analysis of Personal-Professional Status of Women Managers for Sustainable School Management in Turkey Enforced Isolation: How does it affect the Psychosocial and Physical Development of Children? Online Assessment: How Effectively Do They Measure Student Learning at the Tertiary Level?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1