改进系统建模在连续潮流法中的效果

E. Lopez-Luis, M.A. Garcia-Dominguez, D. Ruiz-Vega
{"title":"改进系统建模在连续潮流法中的效果","authors":"E. Lopez-Luis, M.A. Garcia-Dominguez, D. Ruiz-Vega","doi":"10.1109/IREP.2007.4410543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Continuation power flow is one of the proposed long term voltage stability assessment methods. This method attempts to find the voltage stability limit by computing a sequence of very long term equilibrium points, using a static model derived from the equilibrium conditions of the complete non linear dynamic model. During the early stages of the Continuation Power Flow method development, the emphasis was totally addressed to the Continuation method algorithm itself and, in these conditions, the conventional load flow model was the preferred system model. As shown in this paper, using the conventional load flow model, based on unacceptable simplifying assumptions, always produces unrealistic voltage stability results, even when analyzing small academic test systems. This is shown by comparing the results of the Continuation Power Flow method, using the conventional load flow model, to the ones obtained with an improved representation of load characteristics and synchronous generator reactive power limits.","PeriodicalId":214545,"journal":{"name":"2007 iREP Symposium - Bulk Power System Dynamics and Control - VII. Revitalizing Operational Reliability","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of improved system modeling in the continuation power flow method\",\"authors\":\"E. Lopez-Luis, M.A. Garcia-Dominguez, D. Ruiz-Vega\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IREP.2007.4410543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Continuation power flow is one of the proposed long term voltage stability assessment methods. This method attempts to find the voltage stability limit by computing a sequence of very long term equilibrium points, using a static model derived from the equilibrium conditions of the complete non linear dynamic model. During the early stages of the Continuation Power Flow method development, the emphasis was totally addressed to the Continuation method algorithm itself and, in these conditions, the conventional load flow model was the preferred system model. As shown in this paper, using the conventional load flow model, based on unacceptable simplifying assumptions, always produces unrealistic voltage stability results, even when analyzing small academic test systems. This is shown by comparing the results of the Continuation Power Flow method, using the conventional load flow model, to the ones obtained with an improved representation of load characteristics and synchronous generator reactive power limits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":214545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 iREP Symposium - Bulk Power System Dynamics and Control - VII. Revitalizing Operational Reliability\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 iREP Symposium - Bulk Power System Dynamics and Control - VII. Revitalizing Operational Reliability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IREP.2007.4410543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 iREP Symposium - Bulk Power System Dynamics and Control - VII. Revitalizing Operational Reliability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IREP.2007.4410543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

持续潮流是长期电压稳定评估方法之一。该方法利用由完全非线性动态模型的平衡条件导出的静态模型,通过计算一系列很长时间的平衡点,试图找到电压稳定极限。在连续潮流法发展的早期,重点完全放在连续方法算法本身,在这种情况下,传统的潮流模型是首选的系统模型。如本文所示,使用传统的负荷潮流模型,基于不可接受的简化假设,总是产生不切实际的电压稳定性结果,即使在分析小型学术测试系统时也是如此。通过将使用传统潮流模型的连续潮流方法的结果与使用改进的负载特性表示和同步发电机无功功率限制所获得的结果进行比较,可以证明这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of improved system modeling in the continuation power flow method
Continuation power flow is one of the proposed long term voltage stability assessment methods. This method attempts to find the voltage stability limit by computing a sequence of very long term equilibrium points, using a static model derived from the equilibrium conditions of the complete non linear dynamic model. During the early stages of the Continuation Power Flow method development, the emphasis was totally addressed to the Continuation method algorithm itself and, in these conditions, the conventional load flow model was the preferred system model. As shown in this paper, using the conventional load flow model, based on unacceptable simplifying assumptions, always produces unrealistic voltage stability results, even when analyzing small academic test systems. This is shown by comparing the results of the Continuation Power Flow method, using the conventional load flow model, to the ones obtained with an improved representation of load characteristics and synchronous generator reactive power limits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk assessment approach for re-regulated distribution systems The economic aspects of operational reliability in electricity markets Optimal Energy Flow of integrated energy systems with hydrogen economy considerations A hybrid on-line slow voltage control scheme for large power systems Satellite based communication network for large scale power system applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1