从STJ的角度看税收执行的交叉处方:对第14.195/2021号法律的评论和展望

G. Sokal
{"title":"从STJ的角度看税收执行的交叉处方:对第14.195/2021号法律的评论和展望","authors":"G. Sokal","doi":"10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the binding interpretation given by the Superior Court of Justice in regard to the initial term and the way of counting the suspension and intercurrent limitation period regulated by art. 40 of the Law nº 6.830/80, under a critical perspective guided by the light of the fundamental guarantees and the chronic ineffectiveness of tax enforcement in Brazil. At the end, a few new trends brought by the recent reform done by the Law nº 14.195/2021 on the Civil Procedure Code will be pointed out.","PeriodicalId":346094,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prescrição intercorrente na execução fiscal na visão do STJ: notas críticas e perspectivas com a Lei nº 14.195/2021\",\"authors\":\"G. Sokal\",\"doi\":\"10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyzes the binding interpretation given by the Superior Court of Justice in regard to the initial term and the way of counting the suspension and intercurrent limitation period regulated by art. 40 of the Law nº 6.830/80, under a critical perspective guided by the light of the fundamental guarantees and the chronic ineffectiveness of tax enforcement in Brazil. At the end, a few new trends brought by the recent reform done by the Law nº 14.195/2021 on the Civil Procedure Code will be pointed out.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了高等法院对初始期限的约束性解释以及art规定的中止时效和并行时效的计算方法。在巴西税收执法的基本保障和长期无效的指导下,从批判的角度审视第6.830/80号法律第40条。最后,将指出《民事诉讼法》第14.195/2021号法律最近进行的改革所带来的一些新趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A prescrição intercorrente na execução fiscal na visão do STJ: notas críticas e perspectivas com a Lei nº 14.195/2021
This paper analyzes the binding interpretation given by the Superior Court of Justice in regard to the initial term and the way of counting the suspension and intercurrent limitation period regulated by art. 40 of the Law nº 6.830/80, under a critical perspective guided by the light of the fundamental guarantees and the chronic ineffectiveness of tax enforcement in Brazil. At the end, a few new trends brought by the recent reform done by the Law nº 14.195/2021 on the Civil Procedure Code will be pointed out.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Incompletude em contratos de concessão: ainda a teoria da imprevisão?* Procedimentos probatórios autônomos como instrumentos de acertamento fático e fomento ao consenso – breve análise das inovações trazidas pelo art. 381 do novo Código de Processo Civil Dever de agir e precaução: uma análise à luz da tese fixada no julgamento de constitucionalidade da MP nº 966/2020 pelo STF Direito em tempos de crise: o que as contratações públicas podem aprender com a pandemia de COVID-19 O exercício das funções da advocacia pública como atividade exclusiva dos advogados públicos efetivos: uma releitura da Proposta de Súmula Vinculante nº 18 do STF à luz dos dados publicados no 1º Diagnóstico de Advocacia Pública Municipal no Brasil (2019)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1