新冠肺炎时代恢复面对面心理治疗

Gul-e-Naghma Saeed, Sabrin Hossain, N. Schoueri-Mychasiw, Daisy Radha Singla
{"title":"新冠肺炎时代恢复面对面心理治疗","authors":"Gul-e-Naghma Saeed, Sabrin Hossain, N. Schoueri-Mychasiw, Daisy Radha Singla","doi":"10.33137/utjph.v2i2.36996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patient-centered research has emerged as a promising model to adequately address the needs and preferences of patient populations with mental disorders. The Scaling Up Maternal Mental healthcare by Increasing access to Treatment (SUMMIT) Trial aims to increase access to psychological treatment and implements a multi-stakeholder perspective to understand the needs/preferences of perinatal populations with symptoms of depression and anxiety. Specifically, this pragmatic, non-inferiority randomized effectiveness trial examines whether Behavioral Activation (BA) delivered via telemedicine is as effective as in-person treatment. However, due to COVID-19, the study suspended in-person BA sessions and completely shifted to telemedicine. To ensure BA remains widely accessible, the SUMMIT team strives to resume in-person treatment in the near future. \nObjective: To gain perspectives of key stakeholders on the potential barriers and facilitators for SUMMIT participants to resume in-person BA sessions in a COVID-19 context.   \nMethods: A focus group discussion (1 hour) was conducted via Zoom with N=9 stakeholders, including patient advocates, nurses, clinicians, and researchers. Qualitative data was coded using NVivo and content analysis was performed to quantify frequently endorsed themes. \nResults: The majority of stakeholders considered resuming in-person BA sessions to be a challenge amidst COVID-19, with more barriers than facilitators mentioned overall. Most commonly endorsed barriers that participants may face when attending in-person treatment included arranging childcare (n=8; 89%) and discomfort/fear of coming to the hospital (n=6; 67%). The most widely endorsed facilitators for resuming in-person treatment during COVID-19 were clearly communicating hospital and transportation safety precautions to participants (n=7; 78%) and conducting in-person sessions at an off-site location (n=6; 67%). \nConclusion: This study identified critical facilitators of resuming in-person BA sessions that can inform: (1) how to resume in-person BA sessions and (2) the development and implementation of strategies to make BA more patient-centered for perinatal populations during COVID-19. \nObjective: To gain perspectives of key stakeholders on the potential barriers and facilitators for SUMMIT participants to resume in-person BA sessions in a COVID-19 context.    \nMethods: A focus group discussion (1 hour) was conducted via Zoom with N=9 stakeholders, including patient advocates, nurses, clinicians, and researchers. Qualitative data was coded using NVivo and a content analysis was performed to quantify frequently endorsed themes. \nResults: The majority of stakeholders considered resuming in-person BA sessions to be a challenge amidst COVID-19, with more barriers than facilitators mentioned overall. Most commonly endorsed barriers that participants may face when attending in-person treatment included arranging childcare (n=8; 89%) and discomfort/fear of coming to the hospital (n=6; 67%). The most widely endorsed facilitators for resuming in-person treatment during COVID-19 were clearly communicating hospital and transportation safety precautions to participants (n=7; 78%) and conducting in-person sessions at an off-site location (n=6; 67%). \nConclusion: This study identified critical facilitators of resuming in-person BA sessions that can inform: (1) how to resume in-person BA sessions and (2) the development and implementation of strategies to make BA more patient-centered for perinatal populations during COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":265882,"journal":{"name":"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resuming In-person Psychological Treatment in the Era of COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Gul-e-Naghma Saeed, Sabrin Hossain, N. Schoueri-Mychasiw, Daisy Radha Singla\",\"doi\":\"10.33137/utjph.v2i2.36996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Patient-centered research has emerged as a promising model to adequately address the needs and preferences of patient populations with mental disorders. The Scaling Up Maternal Mental healthcare by Increasing access to Treatment (SUMMIT) Trial aims to increase access to psychological treatment and implements a multi-stakeholder perspective to understand the needs/preferences of perinatal populations with symptoms of depression and anxiety. Specifically, this pragmatic, non-inferiority randomized effectiveness trial examines whether Behavioral Activation (BA) delivered via telemedicine is as effective as in-person treatment. However, due to COVID-19, the study suspended in-person BA sessions and completely shifted to telemedicine. To ensure BA remains widely accessible, the SUMMIT team strives to resume in-person treatment in the near future. \\nObjective: To gain perspectives of key stakeholders on the potential barriers and facilitators for SUMMIT participants to resume in-person BA sessions in a COVID-19 context.   \\nMethods: A focus group discussion (1 hour) was conducted via Zoom with N=9 stakeholders, including patient advocates, nurses, clinicians, and researchers. Qualitative data was coded using NVivo and content analysis was performed to quantify frequently endorsed themes. \\nResults: The majority of stakeholders considered resuming in-person BA sessions to be a challenge amidst COVID-19, with more barriers than facilitators mentioned overall. Most commonly endorsed barriers that participants may face when attending in-person treatment included arranging childcare (n=8; 89%) and discomfort/fear of coming to the hospital (n=6; 67%). The most widely endorsed facilitators for resuming in-person treatment during COVID-19 were clearly communicating hospital and transportation safety precautions to participants (n=7; 78%) and conducting in-person sessions at an off-site location (n=6; 67%). \\nConclusion: This study identified critical facilitators of resuming in-person BA sessions that can inform: (1) how to resume in-person BA sessions and (2) the development and implementation of strategies to make BA more patient-centered for perinatal populations during COVID-19. \\nObjective: To gain perspectives of key stakeholders on the potential barriers and facilitators for SUMMIT participants to resume in-person BA sessions in a COVID-19 context.    \\nMethods: A focus group discussion (1 hour) was conducted via Zoom with N=9 stakeholders, including patient advocates, nurses, clinicians, and researchers. Qualitative data was coded using NVivo and a content analysis was performed to quantify frequently endorsed themes. \\nResults: The majority of stakeholders considered resuming in-person BA sessions to be a challenge amidst COVID-19, with more barriers than facilitators mentioned overall. Most commonly endorsed barriers that participants may face when attending in-person treatment included arranging childcare (n=8; 89%) and discomfort/fear of coming to the hospital (n=6; 67%). The most widely endorsed facilitators for resuming in-person treatment during COVID-19 were clearly communicating hospital and transportation safety precautions to participants (n=7; 78%) and conducting in-person sessions at an off-site location (n=6; 67%). \\nConclusion: This study identified critical facilitators of resuming in-person BA sessions that can inform: (1) how to resume in-person BA sessions and (2) the development and implementation of strategies to make BA more patient-centered for perinatal populations during COVID-19.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33137/utjph.v2i2.36996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/utjph.v2i2.36996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以患者为中心的研究已经成为一种有希望的模式,以充分解决精神障碍患者群体的需求和偏好。通过增加获得治疗的机会来扩大孕产妇精神保健(SUMMIT)试验旨在增加获得心理治疗的机会,并实施多方利益相关者的观点,以了解有抑郁和焦虑症状的围产期人群的需求/偏好。具体来说,这项实用的、非劣效性的随机有效性试验检验了通过远程医疗提供的行为激活(BA)是否与现场治疗一样有效。然而,由于新冠肺炎,该研究暂停了面对面的BA会议,并完全转向远程医疗。为了确保广泛使用BA, SUMMIT团队努力在不久的将来恢复亲自治疗。目的:了解主要利益攸关方对峰会参与者在2019冠状病毒病背景下恢复面对面BA会议的潜在障碍和促进因素的看法。方法:通过Zoom与N=9名利益相关者进行焦点小组讨论(1小时),包括患者维权人士、护士、临床医生和研究人员。使用NVivo对定性数据进行编码,并进行内容分析以量化经常认可的主题。结果:大多数利益相关者认为,在2019冠状病毒病期间,恢复面对面的BA会议是一项挑战,总的来说,障碍比推动者更多。参与者在接受面对面治疗时可能面临的最常见的障碍包括安排儿童保育(n=8;89%)和不适/害怕来医院(n=6;67%)。在COVID-19期间恢复面对面治疗方面,最受广泛认可的促进因素是向参与者明确传达医院和交通安全预防措施(n=7;78%)和在非现场地点进行面对面会议(n=6;67%)。结论:本研究确定了恢复面对面BA会议的关键促进因素,可以提供以下信息:(1)如何恢复面对面BA会议;(2)制定和实施策略,使BA在COVID-19期间更加以患者为中心。目的:了解主要利益攸关方对峰会参与者在2019冠状病毒病背景下恢复面对面BA会议的潜在障碍和促进因素的看法。方法:通过Zoom与N=9名利益相关者进行焦点小组讨论(1小时),包括患者维权人士、护士、临床医生和研究人员。使用NVivo对定性数据进行编码,并进行内容分析以量化经常认可的主题。结果:大多数利益相关者认为,在2019冠状病毒病期间,恢复面对面的BA会议是一项挑战,总的来说,障碍比推动者更多。参与者在接受面对面治疗时可能面临的最常见的障碍包括安排儿童保育(n=8;89%)和不适/害怕来医院(n=6;67%)。在COVID-19期间恢复面对面治疗方面,最受广泛认可的促进因素是向参与者明确传达医院和交通安全预防措施(n=7;78%)和在非现场地点进行面对面会议(n=6;67%)。结论:本研究确定了恢复面对面BA会议的关键促进因素,可以提供以下信息:(1)如何恢复面对面BA会议;(2)制定和实施策略,使BA在COVID-19期间更加以患者为中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Resuming In-person Psychological Treatment in the Era of COVID-19
Background: Patient-centered research has emerged as a promising model to adequately address the needs and preferences of patient populations with mental disorders. The Scaling Up Maternal Mental healthcare by Increasing access to Treatment (SUMMIT) Trial aims to increase access to psychological treatment and implements a multi-stakeholder perspective to understand the needs/preferences of perinatal populations with symptoms of depression and anxiety. Specifically, this pragmatic, non-inferiority randomized effectiveness trial examines whether Behavioral Activation (BA) delivered via telemedicine is as effective as in-person treatment. However, due to COVID-19, the study suspended in-person BA sessions and completely shifted to telemedicine. To ensure BA remains widely accessible, the SUMMIT team strives to resume in-person treatment in the near future. Objective: To gain perspectives of key stakeholders on the potential barriers and facilitators for SUMMIT participants to resume in-person BA sessions in a COVID-19 context.   Methods: A focus group discussion (1 hour) was conducted via Zoom with N=9 stakeholders, including patient advocates, nurses, clinicians, and researchers. Qualitative data was coded using NVivo and content analysis was performed to quantify frequently endorsed themes. Results: The majority of stakeholders considered resuming in-person BA sessions to be a challenge amidst COVID-19, with more barriers than facilitators mentioned overall. Most commonly endorsed barriers that participants may face when attending in-person treatment included arranging childcare (n=8; 89%) and discomfort/fear of coming to the hospital (n=6; 67%). The most widely endorsed facilitators for resuming in-person treatment during COVID-19 were clearly communicating hospital and transportation safety precautions to participants (n=7; 78%) and conducting in-person sessions at an off-site location (n=6; 67%). Conclusion: This study identified critical facilitators of resuming in-person BA sessions that can inform: (1) how to resume in-person BA sessions and (2) the development and implementation of strategies to make BA more patient-centered for perinatal populations during COVID-19. Objective: To gain perspectives of key stakeholders on the potential barriers and facilitators for SUMMIT participants to resume in-person BA sessions in a COVID-19 context.    Methods: A focus group discussion (1 hour) was conducted via Zoom with N=9 stakeholders, including patient advocates, nurses, clinicians, and researchers. Qualitative data was coded using NVivo and a content analysis was performed to quantify frequently endorsed themes. Results: The majority of stakeholders considered resuming in-person BA sessions to be a challenge amidst COVID-19, with more barriers than facilitators mentioned overall. Most commonly endorsed barriers that participants may face when attending in-person treatment included arranging childcare (n=8; 89%) and discomfort/fear of coming to the hospital (n=6; 67%). The most widely endorsed facilitators for resuming in-person treatment during COVID-19 were clearly communicating hospital and transportation safety precautions to participants (n=7; 78%) and conducting in-person sessions at an off-site location (n=6; 67%). Conclusion: This study identified critical facilitators of resuming in-person BA sessions that can inform: (1) how to resume in-person BA sessions and (2) the development and implementation of strategies to make BA more patient-centered for perinatal populations during COVID-19.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of School-Based Physical Activity Interventions on Body Mass Index Among ‎Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Randomised Trials Enhancing the care experiences of Black women along the breast cancer journey: Meaningfully engaging breast cancer survivors to co-create a targeted, culturally relevant resource hub Impact of Medical Legal Partnerships: A Scoping Review Exploring Experiences with Social Inclusion, Food Security and Housing Among People Living with HIV: A Qualitative Analysis Rethinking public health pedagogy: lessons learned and pertinent questions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1