贝塔系数与流动性:非对称资产流动性和相关资金冲击下的系统价格风险差异

Roland Umlauft
{"title":"贝塔系数与流动性:非对称资产流动性和相关资金冲击下的系统价格风险差异","authors":"Roland Umlauft","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2134945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research presents evidence for the existence of differences in asset beta risk in the liquidity cross-section of assets due to correlated trading. It is argued that due to differences in liquidity or cost, most trading activity is concentrated on the subset of liquid assets. In the presence of systematic wealth shocks this leads to an increase in beta risk for the liquid asset class beyond their true level of risk from the underlying dividend process with regard to the market risk factor. Vice-versa, the risk of illiquid assets becomes understated. Moreover it is argued that a reduction of trading cost in the cross-section will reduce such differences and lead to a convergence of risk factor estimates towards the true value of underlying risk. Empirical evidence using data surrounding the tick-reduction event at the New York Stock Exchange is supporting this conjecture. It is found that beta estimates for liquid assets exceed their illiquid peers, while the difference in beta between the groups is significantly reduced after the exogenous trading cost reduction due to the tick-change event.","PeriodicalId":214104,"journal":{"name":"Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics - Econometrics of Financial Markets eJournal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Betas and Liquidity: Differences in Systematic Price Risk Due to Asymmetric Asset Liquidity and Correlated Funding Shocks\",\"authors\":\"Roland Umlauft\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2134945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research presents evidence for the existence of differences in asset beta risk in the liquidity cross-section of assets due to correlated trading. It is argued that due to differences in liquidity or cost, most trading activity is concentrated on the subset of liquid assets. In the presence of systematic wealth shocks this leads to an increase in beta risk for the liquid asset class beyond their true level of risk from the underlying dividend process with regard to the market risk factor. Vice-versa, the risk of illiquid assets becomes understated. Moreover it is argued that a reduction of trading cost in the cross-section will reduce such differences and lead to a convergence of risk factor estimates towards the true value of underlying risk. Empirical evidence using data surrounding the tick-reduction event at the New York Stock Exchange is supporting this conjecture. It is found that beta estimates for liquid assets exceed their illiquid peers, while the difference in beta between the groups is significantly reduced after the exogenous trading cost reduction due to the tick-change event.\",\"PeriodicalId\":214104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics - Econometrics of Financial Markets eJournal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics - Econometrics of Financial Markets eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2134945\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrics: Applied Econometric Modeling in Financial Economics - Econometrics of Financial Markets eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2134945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究提供了证据,证明在资产流动性横截面上,由于相关交易,资产贝塔风险存在差异。有人认为,由于流动性或成本的差异,大多数交易活动集中在流动资产的子集上。在存在系统性财富冲击的情况下,这导致流动性资产类别的贝塔风险增加,超出了潜在股息过程中与市场风险因素相关的真实风险水平。反之亦然,非流动性资产的风险被低估了。此外,有人认为,减少横截面上的交易成本将减少这种差异,并导致风险因素估计向潜在风险的真实价值收敛。利用围绕纽约证券交易所股票减持事件的数据的经验证据支持这一猜想。研究发现,流动性资产的贝塔估计值高于非流动性资产的贝塔估计值,而由于期权变动事件导致外生交易成本降低后,两组之间的贝塔估计值差异显著减小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Betas and Liquidity: Differences in Systematic Price Risk Due to Asymmetric Asset Liquidity and Correlated Funding Shocks
This research presents evidence for the existence of differences in asset beta risk in the liquidity cross-section of assets due to correlated trading. It is argued that due to differences in liquidity or cost, most trading activity is concentrated on the subset of liquid assets. In the presence of systematic wealth shocks this leads to an increase in beta risk for the liquid asset class beyond their true level of risk from the underlying dividend process with regard to the market risk factor. Vice-versa, the risk of illiquid assets becomes understated. Moreover it is argued that a reduction of trading cost in the cross-section will reduce such differences and lead to a convergence of risk factor estimates towards the true value of underlying risk. Empirical evidence using data surrounding the tick-reduction event at the New York Stock Exchange is supporting this conjecture. It is found that beta estimates for liquid assets exceed their illiquid peers, while the difference in beta between the groups is significantly reduced after the exogenous trading cost reduction due to the tick-change event.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Growing Pains: International Instability and Equity Market Returns Valuing American Options Using Fast Recursive Projections Momentum and Reversal: Does What Goes Up Always Come Down? Macro Variables and the Components of Stock Returns Variance Risk Premium and VIX Pricing: A Simple GARCH Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1