{"title":"穆罕默德·本·穆斯塔法·陶斯卡里在其著作《穆塔菲菲》中对词法的争论","authors":"Youssef Khalaf Mahal, Hamid Abdullah Saleh","doi":"10.47832/2791-9323.3-2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disagreement occurred between the Basri and Kufi doctrines, in many branches, and each of them went to support his doctrine according to the method that he followed with textual and rational evidence, and the difference increased and raged between them for a long time, and the early scholars alerted to this grammatical dispute, and the first to write about it was a fox ( D. 291 AH) wrote his book (The Difference of Grammarians), then after that synonymous and successive books, hence my research was called (the morphological dispute at Al-Tauskari in his book Bada’a Al-Muktafi fi explaining the adequacy of Al-Mubtadi), and it included three sections that were previously translated by the author, and a foreword to the grammatical dispute, and dealt with In the first topic: the controversial issues that he preferred, while the second topic included the controversial issues that the author left without weighting, and the third topic is the issues that were called the agreement between scholars and they are originally in dispute: This research is on a number of Arabic sources, the most important of which are: Sibawayh’s book, al-Muqtadat, Usul fi Grammar, Explanation of the Mufassal, Rashish for beating, and other sources.","PeriodicalId":181603,"journal":{"name":"International Journal Of Education And Language Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE MORPHOLOGICAL CONTROVERSY OF MUHAMMAD BIN MUSTAFA AL-TAUSKARI IN HIS BOOK (BADAH AL-MUKTAFI FI SHARH KIFAYA AL-MUBTADI(\",\"authors\":\"Youssef Khalaf Mahal, Hamid Abdullah Saleh\",\"doi\":\"10.47832/2791-9323.3-2.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Disagreement occurred between the Basri and Kufi doctrines, in many branches, and each of them went to support his doctrine according to the method that he followed with textual and rational evidence, and the difference increased and raged between them for a long time, and the early scholars alerted to this grammatical dispute, and the first to write about it was a fox ( D. 291 AH) wrote his book (The Difference of Grammarians), then after that synonymous and successive books, hence my research was called (the morphological dispute at Al-Tauskari in his book Bada’a Al-Muktafi fi explaining the adequacy of Al-Mubtadi), and it included three sections that were previously translated by the author, and a foreword to the grammatical dispute, and dealt with In the first topic: the controversial issues that he preferred, while the second topic included the controversial issues that the author left without weighting, and the third topic is the issues that were called the agreement between scholars and they are originally in dispute: This research is on a number of Arabic sources, the most important of which are: Sibawayh’s book, al-Muqtadat, Usul fi Grammar, Explanation of the Mufassal, Rashish for beating, and other sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":181603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal Of Education And Language Studies\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal Of Education And Language Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47832/2791-9323.3-2.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal Of Education And Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47832/2791-9323.3-2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
之间的分歧发生Basri Kufi)学说,在许多分支,和他们每个人去支持他的理论根据他的方法与文本和理性的证据,以及它们之间的差异增加,持续了很长时间,和早期的学者注意到了这个语法纠纷,和第一个写一只狐狸(d . 291啊)写他的书(语法学家的差异),之后的和连续的书籍,因此,我的研究被称为(在他的书Bada 'a Al-Muktafi fi解释Al-Mubtadi的充分性中的Al-Tauskari的词法争议),它包括作者先前翻译的三个部分,以及语法争议的前言,并在第一个主题中处理:第二个主题包括作者没有加权的有争议的问题,而第三个主题是被称为学者之间的协议的问题,他们最初存在争议:本研究涉及许多阿拉伯语来源,其中最重要的是:Sibawayh的书,al-Muqtadat, Usul fi语法,Mufassal的解释,殴打的Rashish和其他来源。
THE MORPHOLOGICAL CONTROVERSY OF MUHAMMAD BIN MUSTAFA AL-TAUSKARI IN HIS BOOK (BADAH AL-MUKTAFI FI SHARH KIFAYA AL-MUBTADI(
Disagreement occurred between the Basri and Kufi doctrines, in many branches, and each of them went to support his doctrine according to the method that he followed with textual and rational evidence, and the difference increased and raged between them for a long time, and the early scholars alerted to this grammatical dispute, and the first to write about it was a fox ( D. 291 AH) wrote his book (The Difference of Grammarians), then after that synonymous and successive books, hence my research was called (the morphological dispute at Al-Tauskari in his book Bada’a Al-Muktafi fi explaining the adequacy of Al-Mubtadi), and it included three sections that were previously translated by the author, and a foreword to the grammatical dispute, and dealt with In the first topic: the controversial issues that he preferred, while the second topic included the controversial issues that the author left without weighting, and the third topic is the issues that were called the agreement between scholars and they are originally in dispute: This research is on a number of Arabic sources, the most important of which are: Sibawayh’s book, al-Muqtadat, Usul fi Grammar, Explanation of the Mufassal, Rashish for beating, and other sources.