美国最高法院在美国联邦制度中的作用

J. Kincaid
{"title":"美国最高法院在美国联邦制度中的作用","authors":"J. Kincaid","doi":"10.5771/9783748910817-153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Supreme Court of the United States has played major roles in shaping American federalism since the start of the republic. In 1793, the Court ordered Georgia to pay two South Carolina residents a debt owed to them.1 The decision prompted ratification of the Eleventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1795, which protects states’ sovereign immunity by prohibiting citizens of a U.S. state from suing another state in federal court.2 Overall, the Court has supported centralization, especially since 1937, although, at times, the Court protects powers of the states against centralization.3 The Court has never formulated a coherent federalism doctrine, but it has set forth various narrow doctrines that protect states’ powers in some ways. The United States has a dual federal system in which the federal government is granted specific powers enumerated in the U.S. Constitution. All other powers are reserved to the states, including the important police power, which is the authority of states to legislate for the health, safety, welfare, and morals of their citizens. Significant domestic powers of the federal government include its independent tax and expenditure powers and authority to regulate interstate and foreign commerce. The Constitution’s “necessary and proper” clause (Art. I, Sec. 8) allows Congress to interpret its delegated powers broadly; its “supremacy clause” (Art. VI) ensures that the U.S. Constitution, treaties, and federal laws enacted pursuant to the Constitution prevail in conflicts with state constitutions and statutes. The nine members of the Court are nominated by the President and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Justices serve until they resign, retire, die, or are impeached and removed from the Court by Congress.4 Congress can increase but not decrease justices’ salaries during their service. One can divide the Court’s history into four periods.","PeriodicalId":202341,"journal":{"name":"Jahrbuch des Föderalismus 2020","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Roles of the U.S. Supreme Court in American Federalism\",\"authors\":\"J. Kincaid\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/9783748910817-153\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Supreme Court of the United States has played major roles in shaping American federalism since the start of the republic. In 1793, the Court ordered Georgia to pay two South Carolina residents a debt owed to them.1 The decision prompted ratification of the Eleventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1795, which protects states’ sovereign immunity by prohibiting citizens of a U.S. state from suing another state in federal court.2 Overall, the Court has supported centralization, especially since 1937, although, at times, the Court protects powers of the states against centralization.3 The Court has never formulated a coherent federalism doctrine, but it has set forth various narrow doctrines that protect states’ powers in some ways. The United States has a dual federal system in which the federal government is granted specific powers enumerated in the U.S. Constitution. All other powers are reserved to the states, including the important police power, which is the authority of states to legislate for the health, safety, welfare, and morals of their citizens. Significant domestic powers of the federal government include its independent tax and expenditure powers and authority to regulate interstate and foreign commerce. The Constitution’s “necessary and proper” clause (Art. I, Sec. 8) allows Congress to interpret its delegated powers broadly; its “supremacy clause” (Art. VI) ensures that the U.S. Constitution, treaties, and federal laws enacted pursuant to the Constitution prevail in conflicts with state constitutions and statutes. The nine members of the Court are nominated by the President and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Justices serve until they resign, retire, die, or are impeached and removed from the Court by Congress.4 Congress can increase but not decrease justices’ salaries during their service. One can divide the Court’s history into four periods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jahrbuch des Föderalismus 2020\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jahrbuch des Föderalismus 2020\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748910817-153\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jahrbuch des Föderalismus 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748910817-153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自共和国成立以来,美国最高法院在塑造美国联邦制方面发挥了重要作用。1793年,法院命令乔治亚州偿还两名南卡罗来纳居民欠他们的债务这一裁决促使1795年美国宪法第十一修正案获得批准,该修正案通过禁止美国一个州的公民在联邦法院起诉另一个州来保护各州的主权豁免权总体而言,最高法院支持中央集权,特别是自1937年以来,尽管有时最高法院也保护各州的权力不受中央集权的影响最高法院从未制定出连贯的联邦制原则,但它提出了各种狭隘的原则,以某种方式保护各州的权力。美国实行双重联邦制,其中联邦政府被授予美国宪法所列举的特定权力。所有其他权力都保留给各州,包括重要的警察权力,这是各州为其公民的健康、安全、福利和道德立法的权力。联邦政府的重要国内权力包括其独立的税收和支出权力以及管理州际和对外贸易的权力。宪法的“必要和适当”条款(第2条)。第1条第8款)允许国会广泛地解释其授权;其“至上条款”(第16条)。(六)确保根据宪法制定的美国宪法、条约和联邦法律在与州宪法和法规相冲突时占上风。最高法院的九名法官由总统提名,并经美国参议院批准。法官的任期直到辞职、退休、死亡或被国会弹劾和免职为止。在法官任职期间,国会可以增加但不能减少法官的工资。人们可以把法院的历史分为四个时期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Roles of the U.S. Supreme Court in American Federalism
The Supreme Court of the United States has played major roles in shaping American federalism since the start of the republic. In 1793, the Court ordered Georgia to pay two South Carolina residents a debt owed to them.1 The decision prompted ratification of the Eleventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in 1795, which protects states’ sovereign immunity by prohibiting citizens of a U.S. state from suing another state in federal court.2 Overall, the Court has supported centralization, especially since 1937, although, at times, the Court protects powers of the states against centralization.3 The Court has never formulated a coherent federalism doctrine, but it has set forth various narrow doctrines that protect states’ powers in some ways. The United States has a dual federal system in which the federal government is granted specific powers enumerated in the U.S. Constitution. All other powers are reserved to the states, including the important police power, which is the authority of states to legislate for the health, safety, welfare, and morals of their citizens. Significant domestic powers of the federal government include its independent tax and expenditure powers and authority to regulate interstate and foreign commerce. The Constitution’s “necessary and proper” clause (Art. I, Sec. 8) allows Congress to interpret its delegated powers broadly; its “supremacy clause” (Art. VI) ensures that the U.S. Constitution, treaties, and federal laws enacted pursuant to the Constitution prevail in conflicts with state constitutions and statutes. The nine members of the Court are nominated by the President and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Justices serve until they resign, retire, die, or are impeached and removed from the Court by Congress.4 Congress can increase but not decrease justices’ salaries during their service. One can divide the Court’s history into four periods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Eine Abstimmungslandschaft im Spiegel der Demokratie: ein Rückblick auf die kantonalen Abstimmungen in den Jahren 2012 bis 2020 Litigating Regionalism in Italy: the Constitutional Court and the Dynamics of the Territorial Constitution Frauen in der lokalen und regionalen Politik: 28,9 Prozent in Räten, aber nur 15,4 Prozent Bürgermeisterinnen – ein europaweiter Vergleich Innerverbandliche Kontrolle als Problemfeld des Wohlfahrtsföderalismus: historische Entwicklungslinien und aktuelle Herausforderungen am Beispiel der Arbeiterwohlfahrt Wenn dem Bundesstaat die Stunde der Exekutive schlägt: der deutsche (Exekutiv-)Föderalismus in Zeiten der Coronakrise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1