{"title":"牙髓-牙周病变(EPL)的处理:一个病例系列","authors":"Ya-Cheng Chang Ya-Cheng Chang, King-Jean Wu Ya-Cheng Chang","doi":"10.53106/261634032022090502008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Abstract: Endodontic-Periodontal Lesions (EPL) often progress slowly without obvious symptoms, unless exacerbated by swelling or pus discharge. The aim of this report is to investigate whether a short waiting time (simultaneous or within a 1-month interval) between non-surgical endodontic and periodontal treatment affects the prognosis, root resection considerations and influencing factors associated with the efficacy of treatment for true-combined EPL. Materials and Methods: This case series selected three examples of true-combined EPL. In cases 1 and 2, a short waiting period between non-surgical endodontic and the subsequent periodontal treatment was implemented, simultaneously in case 1 and after a 1-month interval in case 2. In case 3, we presented a treatment sequence of vertical root fracture related EPL. Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), furcation involvement, mobility and radiograph were recorded and evaluated 6 months after the final treatments. Results: In case 1, the deepest PD changed from 8 mm to 4 mm; CAL changed from 11 mm to 8 mm. In case 2, the deepest PD changed from 10 mm to 3 mm; CAL changed from 10 mm to 5 mm. In case 3, the deepest PD changed from 7mm to 3mm; CAL changed from 10mm to 4mm. As for the radiograph, all cases with obvious bone fill 6 months after the final treatments. Conclusion: When facing the true combined EPL, from these cases we can implement non-surgical endodontic and periodontal treatment simultaneously or within a short waiting period, with a favorable outcome coming after a 6 month follow up. When the vertical root fracture is suspected, inflammation control and a flap operation to ascertain the diagnosis are indicated.\n \n","PeriodicalId":150986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of the Endodontic–Periodontal Lesions (EPL): A Case Series\",\"authors\":\"Ya-Cheng Chang Ya-Cheng Chang, King-Jean Wu Ya-Cheng Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.53106/261634032022090502008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Abstract: Endodontic-Periodontal Lesions (EPL) often progress slowly without obvious symptoms, unless exacerbated by swelling or pus discharge. The aim of this report is to investigate whether a short waiting time (simultaneous or within a 1-month interval) between non-surgical endodontic and periodontal treatment affects the prognosis, root resection considerations and influencing factors associated with the efficacy of treatment for true-combined EPL. Materials and Methods: This case series selected three examples of true-combined EPL. In cases 1 and 2, a short waiting period between non-surgical endodontic and the subsequent periodontal treatment was implemented, simultaneously in case 1 and after a 1-month interval in case 2. In case 3, we presented a treatment sequence of vertical root fracture related EPL. Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), furcation involvement, mobility and radiograph were recorded and evaluated 6 months after the final treatments. Results: In case 1, the deepest PD changed from 8 mm to 4 mm; CAL changed from 11 mm to 8 mm. In case 2, the deepest PD changed from 10 mm to 3 mm; CAL changed from 10 mm to 5 mm. In case 3, the deepest PD changed from 7mm to 3mm; CAL changed from 10mm to 4mm. As for the radiograph, all cases with obvious bone fill 6 months after the final treatments. Conclusion: When facing the true combined EPL, from these cases we can implement non-surgical endodontic and periodontal treatment simultaneously or within a short waiting period, with a favorable outcome coming after a 6 month follow up. When the vertical root fracture is suspected, inflammation control and a flap operation to ascertain the diagnosis are indicated.\\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":150986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53106/261634032022090502008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/261634032022090502008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Management of the Endodontic–Periodontal Lesions (EPL): A Case Series
Abstract: Endodontic-Periodontal Lesions (EPL) often progress slowly without obvious symptoms, unless exacerbated by swelling or pus discharge. The aim of this report is to investigate whether a short waiting time (simultaneous or within a 1-month interval) between non-surgical endodontic and periodontal treatment affects the prognosis, root resection considerations and influencing factors associated with the efficacy of treatment for true-combined EPL. Materials and Methods: This case series selected three examples of true-combined EPL. In cases 1 and 2, a short waiting period between non-surgical endodontic and the subsequent periodontal treatment was implemented, simultaneously in case 1 and after a 1-month interval in case 2. In case 3, we presented a treatment sequence of vertical root fracture related EPL. Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), furcation involvement, mobility and radiograph were recorded and evaluated 6 months after the final treatments. Results: In case 1, the deepest PD changed from 8 mm to 4 mm; CAL changed from 11 mm to 8 mm. In case 2, the deepest PD changed from 10 mm to 3 mm; CAL changed from 10 mm to 5 mm. In case 3, the deepest PD changed from 7mm to 3mm; CAL changed from 10mm to 4mm. As for the radiograph, all cases with obvious bone fill 6 months after the final treatments. Conclusion: When facing the true combined EPL, from these cases we can implement non-surgical endodontic and periodontal treatment simultaneously or within a short waiting period, with a favorable outcome coming after a 6 month follow up. When the vertical root fracture is suspected, inflammation control and a flap operation to ascertain the diagnosis are indicated.