{"title":"伊丽莎白·沃泽尔和大卫·福斯特·华莱士的鬼魂:抑郁、真诚、幽灵学","authors":"B. Nicol","doi":"10.1080/14775700.2021.1977560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This essay explores the relationship between Elizabeth Wurtzel and David Foster Wallace, two writers who are in different ways representative of the ‘in-between’ status of the 1990s, and who both pioneered different modes of writing which remain influential today: Wurtzel’s ‘obscene’ (in Baudrillard’s terms) confessional style, and Wallace’s post-postmodern aesthetics of sincerity. In particular it considers Wallace’s short story ‘The Depressed Person’ (from his collection Brief Interviews with Hideous Men), which is widely understood to be ‘about’ Wurtzel. While somewhat cruel and misogynistic on the surface, the hauntological dimension of this text – ie the effect created by the posthumous context of reading it now, when both writer and alleged subject are no longer with us – opens up a different reading, one which enables us to explore the association with depression which is central to understanding both authors. The essay compares ‘The Depressed Person’ to Wurtzel’s own rather circumspect memorial of Wallace, ‘Beyond the Trouble, More Trouble’, published in 2008 shortly after his death. Read posthumously, both texts come to seem unlikely companion pieces. For all their substantial differences, both effectively advance a similar, bleak yet carefully considered, conclusion about what it means to suffer with depression which casts new light on Wallace’s notion of sincerity and Wurtzel’s ‘obscene’ approach to autobiography.","PeriodicalId":114563,"journal":{"name":"Comparative American Studies An International Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ghosts of Elizabeth Wurtzel and David Foster Wallace: Depression, Sincerity, Hauntology\",\"authors\":\"B. Nicol\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14775700.2021.1977560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This essay explores the relationship between Elizabeth Wurtzel and David Foster Wallace, two writers who are in different ways representative of the ‘in-between’ status of the 1990s, and who both pioneered different modes of writing which remain influential today: Wurtzel’s ‘obscene’ (in Baudrillard’s terms) confessional style, and Wallace’s post-postmodern aesthetics of sincerity. In particular it considers Wallace’s short story ‘The Depressed Person’ (from his collection Brief Interviews with Hideous Men), which is widely understood to be ‘about’ Wurtzel. While somewhat cruel and misogynistic on the surface, the hauntological dimension of this text – ie the effect created by the posthumous context of reading it now, when both writer and alleged subject are no longer with us – opens up a different reading, one which enables us to explore the association with depression which is central to understanding both authors. The essay compares ‘The Depressed Person’ to Wurtzel’s own rather circumspect memorial of Wallace, ‘Beyond the Trouble, More Trouble’, published in 2008 shortly after his death. Read posthumously, both texts come to seem unlikely companion pieces. For all their substantial differences, both effectively advance a similar, bleak yet carefully considered, conclusion about what it means to suffer with depression which casts new light on Wallace’s notion of sincerity and Wurtzel’s ‘obscene’ approach to autobiography.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative American Studies An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative American Studies An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14775700.2021.1977560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative American Studies An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14775700.2021.1977560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本文探讨了伊丽莎白·沃泽尔和大卫·福斯特·华莱士之间的关系,这两位作家以不同的方式代表了20世纪90年代的“中间”状态,他们都开创了不同的写作模式,这些模式在今天仍然具有影响力:沃泽尔的“淫秽”(用鲍德里亚的话来说)忏悔风格,而华莱士的后后现代真诚美学。它特别考虑了华莱士的短篇小说《抑郁的人》(摘自他的合集《与丑陋男人的简短访谈》),这部小说被广泛认为是“关于”伍泽尔的。虽然表面上有些残酷和厌恶女性,但这篇文章的鬼魂维度——即现在阅读它时,作者和所谓的主题都已不在我们身边,在死后的语境中产生的影响——开启了一种不同的阅读方式,使我们能够探索与抑郁的联系,这是理解两位作者的核心。这篇文章将《抑郁的人》与伍泽尔在华莱士去世后不久于2008年出版的《超越麻烦,更多麻烦》(Beyond The Trouble, More Trouble)相比较,后者相当谨慎。在他死后阅读,这两篇文章似乎不太可能成为伴侣。尽管他们之间存在着巨大的差异,但他们都有效地提出了一个相似的、凄凉但经过深思熟虑的结论,即抑郁症意味着什么,这一结论为华莱士的真诚概念和伍泽尔的“淫秽”自传方式提供了新的视角。
The ghosts of Elizabeth Wurtzel and David Foster Wallace: Depression, Sincerity, Hauntology
ABSTRACT This essay explores the relationship between Elizabeth Wurtzel and David Foster Wallace, two writers who are in different ways representative of the ‘in-between’ status of the 1990s, and who both pioneered different modes of writing which remain influential today: Wurtzel’s ‘obscene’ (in Baudrillard’s terms) confessional style, and Wallace’s post-postmodern aesthetics of sincerity. In particular it considers Wallace’s short story ‘The Depressed Person’ (from his collection Brief Interviews with Hideous Men), which is widely understood to be ‘about’ Wurtzel. While somewhat cruel and misogynistic on the surface, the hauntological dimension of this text – ie the effect created by the posthumous context of reading it now, when both writer and alleged subject are no longer with us – opens up a different reading, one which enables us to explore the association with depression which is central to understanding both authors. The essay compares ‘The Depressed Person’ to Wurtzel’s own rather circumspect memorial of Wallace, ‘Beyond the Trouble, More Trouble’, published in 2008 shortly after his death. Read posthumously, both texts come to seem unlikely companion pieces. For all their substantial differences, both effectively advance a similar, bleak yet carefully considered, conclusion about what it means to suffer with depression which casts new light on Wallace’s notion of sincerity and Wurtzel’s ‘obscene’ approach to autobiography.