干法分离粉砂砾石土的筛分误差

H. Rönnqvist
{"title":"干法分离粉砂砾石土的筛分误差","authors":"H. Rönnqvist","doi":"10.4236/ojce.2019.94022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dry-separation method is an alternative to the wet-preparation in the \ncurrent European Standard for the determination of particle size distributions \nby the sieving of soils. Due to the risk of error, dry-separation is cautioned \nagainst in the standard; however, there is no additional guidance as to when it \nis unsuitable nor for the magnitude of error that it may introduce. This study \ninvestigates the dry-separation method as an alternative by comparing with the conventional method of Wet-preparation in terms of particle-size distributions of eight cohesionless sand-gravel \nsoils with varying amounts of nonplastic fines. The findings indicate a \ngradually increasing sieving error for fractions at minus 0.5 mm with the amount of fines in the \nsoil, and depending on the fines content of the soil, dry-separation introduced \nerrors upwards of 45% in silt-sand-gravel soils. An \nempirical best-fit formula is proposed for the \nestimation of the error using the dry-preparation method on this type of soil. \nFurthermore, to avoid sieving errors, the results suggest that the dry-separation method should not be used for silt-sand-gravel \nsoils exceeding 2% silt size fractions.","PeriodicalId":302856,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sieving Error from Dry-Separating Silt-Sand-Gravel Soils\",\"authors\":\"H. Rönnqvist\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/ojce.2019.94022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The dry-separation method is an alternative to the wet-preparation in the \\ncurrent European Standard for the determination of particle size distributions \\nby the sieving of soils. Due to the risk of error, dry-separation is cautioned \\nagainst in the standard; however, there is no additional guidance as to when it \\nis unsuitable nor for the magnitude of error that it may introduce. This study \\ninvestigates the dry-separation method as an alternative by comparing with the conventional method of Wet-preparation in terms of particle-size distributions of eight cohesionless sand-gravel \\nsoils with varying amounts of nonplastic fines. The findings indicate a \\ngradually increasing sieving error for fractions at minus 0.5 mm with the amount of fines in the \\nsoil, and depending on the fines content of the soil, dry-separation introduced \\nerrors upwards of 45% in silt-sand-gravel soils. An \\nempirical best-fit formula is proposed for the \\nestimation of the error using the dry-preparation method on this type of soil. \\nFurthermore, to avoid sieving errors, the results suggest that the dry-separation method should not be used for silt-sand-gravel \\nsoils exceeding 2% silt size fractions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2019.94022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2019.94022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在目前的欧洲标准中,通过筛分土壤来测定粒度分布,干燥分离方法是湿法制备的替代方法。由于存在误差的风险,标准中警告不要采用干式分离;但是,对于何时不适合,以及可能引入的误差大小,没有额外的指导。本研究通过与传统湿法制备方法的比较,研究了8种具有不同数量非塑性细粒的无黏性砂砾土的粒径分布情况。研究结果表明,随着土壤中细粒含量的增加,- 0.5 mm部分的筛分误差逐渐增加,并且根据土壤中细粒含量的不同,干分选在粉砂砾石土壤中引入的误差高达45%以上。提出了一种经验最佳拟合公式,用于估算干法制备法在这类土壤上的误差。此外,为了避免筛分误差,研究结果表明,对于粉砂砾石粒度超过2%的土,不应采用干分选法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sieving Error from Dry-Separating Silt-Sand-Gravel Soils
The dry-separation method is an alternative to the wet-preparation in the current European Standard for the determination of particle size distributions by the sieving of soils. Due to the risk of error, dry-separation is cautioned against in the standard; however, there is no additional guidance as to when it is unsuitable nor for the magnitude of error that it may introduce. This study investigates the dry-separation method as an alternative by comparing with the conventional method of Wet-preparation in terms of particle-size distributions of eight cohesionless sand-gravel soils with varying amounts of nonplastic fines. The findings indicate a gradually increasing sieving error for fractions at minus 0.5 mm with the amount of fines in the soil, and depending on the fines content of the soil, dry-separation introduced errors upwards of 45% in silt-sand-gravel soils. An empirical best-fit formula is proposed for the estimation of the error using the dry-preparation method on this type of soil. Furthermore, to avoid sieving errors, the results suggest that the dry-separation method should not be used for silt-sand-gravel soils exceeding 2% silt size fractions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interchange Sight Distance and Design: Aspects and Implementation A Slip-Force Device for Maintaining Constant Lateral Pressure on Retaining Structures in Expansive Soils Practical Engineering Behavior of Egyptian Collapsible Soils, Laboratory and In-Situ Experimental Study Structural Health Monitoring for Reinforced Concrete Containment Using Inner Electrical Resistivity Method Hardening Properties of Foamed Concrete with Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler Ash, Blast Furnace Slag, and Desulfurization Gypsum as the Binder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1