{"title":"干法分离粉砂砾石土的筛分误差","authors":"H. Rönnqvist","doi":"10.4236/ojce.2019.94022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The dry-separation method is an alternative to the wet-preparation in the \ncurrent European Standard for the determination of particle size distributions \nby the sieving of soils. Due to the risk of error, dry-separation is cautioned \nagainst in the standard; however, there is no additional guidance as to when it \nis unsuitable nor for the magnitude of error that it may introduce. This study \ninvestigates the dry-separation method as an alternative by comparing with the conventional method of Wet-preparation in terms of particle-size distributions of eight cohesionless sand-gravel \nsoils with varying amounts of nonplastic fines. The findings indicate a \ngradually increasing sieving error for fractions at minus 0.5 mm with the amount of fines in the \nsoil, and depending on the fines content of the soil, dry-separation introduced \nerrors upwards of 45% in silt-sand-gravel soils. An \nempirical best-fit formula is proposed for the \nestimation of the error using the dry-preparation method on this type of soil. \nFurthermore, to avoid sieving errors, the results suggest that the dry-separation method should not be used for silt-sand-gravel \nsoils exceeding 2% silt size fractions.","PeriodicalId":302856,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sieving Error from Dry-Separating Silt-Sand-Gravel Soils\",\"authors\":\"H. Rönnqvist\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/ojce.2019.94022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The dry-separation method is an alternative to the wet-preparation in the \\ncurrent European Standard for the determination of particle size distributions \\nby the sieving of soils. Due to the risk of error, dry-separation is cautioned \\nagainst in the standard; however, there is no additional guidance as to when it \\nis unsuitable nor for the magnitude of error that it may introduce. This study \\ninvestigates the dry-separation method as an alternative by comparing with the conventional method of Wet-preparation in terms of particle-size distributions of eight cohesionless sand-gravel \\nsoils with varying amounts of nonplastic fines. The findings indicate a \\ngradually increasing sieving error for fractions at minus 0.5 mm with the amount of fines in the \\nsoil, and depending on the fines content of the soil, dry-separation introduced \\nerrors upwards of 45% in silt-sand-gravel soils. An \\nempirical best-fit formula is proposed for the \\nestimation of the error using the dry-preparation method on this type of soil. \\nFurthermore, to avoid sieving errors, the results suggest that the dry-separation method should not be used for silt-sand-gravel \\nsoils exceeding 2% silt size fractions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2019.94022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2019.94022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sieving Error from Dry-Separating Silt-Sand-Gravel Soils
The dry-separation method is an alternative to the wet-preparation in the
current European Standard for the determination of particle size distributions
by the sieving of soils. Due to the risk of error, dry-separation is cautioned
against in the standard; however, there is no additional guidance as to when it
is unsuitable nor for the magnitude of error that it may introduce. This study
investigates the dry-separation method as an alternative by comparing with the conventional method of Wet-preparation in terms of particle-size distributions of eight cohesionless sand-gravel
soils with varying amounts of nonplastic fines. The findings indicate a
gradually increasing sieving error for fractions at minus 0.5 mm with the amount of fines in the
soil, and depending on the fines content of the soil, dry-separation introduced
errors upwards of 45% in silt-sand-gravel soils. An
empirical best-fit formula is proposed for the
estimation of the error using the dry-preparation method on this type of soil.
Furthermore, to avoid sieving errors, the results suggest that the dry-separation method should not be used for silt-sand-gravel
soils exceeding 2% silt size fractions.