平衡跨界水治理中利益分享的讨论:以中亚为例强调长期成本

Ilkhom Soliev, K. Wegerich, I. Akramova, Nozilakhon Mukhamedova
{"title":"平衡跨界水治理中利益分享的讨论:以中亚为例强调长期成本","authors":"Ilkhom Soliev, K. Wegerich, I. Akramova, Nozilakhon Mukhamedova","doi":"10.7564/15-IJWG94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Internationally the benefit sharing approach is promoted to encourage cooperation in transboundary \nwater governance. Costs of cooperation are so far under researched. Attention of few \ninternational studies is limited to benefit and cost sharing practices for dam projects. Here, the case \nstudy looks at long-term costs of cooperation in an empirical example from Central Asia. In the \nSyr Darya Basin, a compensation package for constructing the Toktogul Reservoir on the Naryn \nin upstream Kyrgyzstan required Uzbekistan to shift water withdrawals from small transboundary \ntributaries to the main river. The shift of water allocation created long-term costs for Uzbekistan. \nThe paper highlights the challenges related to the originally perceived as beneficial compensation \nmechanisms (water swaps) within one basin and long-term cost implications. The need for \nrevision of benefit sharing agreements to allow adaptation to new challenges is discussed. We \nstress the costs when existing benefit sharing arrangements are ignored whether in full or in part. \nKeywords: Transboundary water; Benefit sharing; Long-term costs; Pumping stations; Central Asia","PeriodicalId":137430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Law eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing the Discussion of Benefit Sharing in Transboundary Water Governance: Stressing the Long-Term Costs in an Empirical Example from Central Asia\",\"authors\":\"Ilkhom Soliev, K. Wegerich, I. Akramova, Nozilakhon Mukhamedova\",\"doi\":\"10.7564/15-IJWG94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Internationally the benefit sharing approach is promoted to encourage cooperation in transboundary \\nwater governance. Costs of cooperation are so far under researched. Attention of few \\ninternational studies is limited to benefit and cost sharing practices for dam projects. Here, the case \\nstudy looks at long-term costs of cooperation in an empirical example from Central Asia. In the \\nSyr Darya Basin, a compensation package for constructing the Toktogul Reservoir on the Naryn \\nin upstream Kyrgyzstan required Uzbekistan to shift water withdrawals from small transboundary \\ntributaries to the main river. The shift of water allocation created long-term costs for Uzbekistan. \\nThe paper highlights the challenges related to the originally perceived as beneficial compensation \\nmechanisms (water swaps) within one basin and long-term cost implications. The need for \\nrevision of benefit sharing agreements to allow adaptation to new challenges is discussed. We \\nstress the costs when existing benefit sharing arrangements are ignored whether in full or in part. \\nKeywords: Transboundary water; Benefit sharing; Long-term costs; Pumping stations; Central Asia\",\"PeriodicalId\":137430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Law eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7564/15-IJWG94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7564/15-IJWG94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在国际上,促进利益分享办法,以鼓励跨界水治理方面的合作。迄今为止,合作的成本尚未得到研究。很少有国际研究关注大坝项目的效益和成本分担做法。本案例研究以中亚为例,考察了合作的长期成本。在锡尔河流域,在吉尔吉斯斯坦上游的纳林河上建造托克托古尔水库的补偿方案要求乌兹别克斯坦将从小型跨界支流的取水转移到主要河流。水资源分配的转变给乌兹别克斯坦带来了长期成本。本文强调了与最初被认为是一个流域内有益的补偿机制(水交换)和长期成本影响相关的挑战。讨论了修订利益分享协定以适应新挑战的必要性。我们强调在全部或部分忽视现有利益分享安排时的成本。关键词:跨界水;利益共享;长期成本;泵站;中亚
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Balancing the Discussion of Benefit Sharing in Transboundary Water Governance: Stressing the Long-Term Costs in an Empirical Example from Central Asia
Internationally the benefit sharing approach is promoted to encourage cooperation in transboundary water governance. Costs of cooperation are so far under researched. Attention of few international studies is limited to benefit and cost sharing practices for dam projects. Here, the case study looks at long-term costs of cooperation in an empirical example from Central Asia. In the Syr Darya Basin, a compensation package for constructing the Toktogul Reservoir on the Naryn in upstream Kyrgyzstan required Uzbekistan to shift water withdrawals from small transboundary tributaries to the main river. The shift of water allocation created long-term costs for Uzbekistan. The paper highlights the challenges related to the originally perceived as beneficial compensation mechanisms (water swaps) within one basin and long-term cost implications. The need for revision of benefit sharing agreements to allow adaptation to new challenges is discussed. We stress the costs when existing benefit sharing arrangements are ignored whether in full or in part. Keywords: Transboundary water; Benefit sharing; Long-term costs; Pumping stations; Central Asia
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Debate on Constitutional Standing and Greater Autonomy for Cities: Lessons from The Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macao Agility Over Stability: China’s Great Reversal in Regulating the Platform Economy The Governance Crisis in Myanmar: An International Law Perspective and International Society Response Towards Myanmar 2021 Coup D’ Etat. Vietnam: Data Privacy in a Communist ASEAN State India's Cartel Penalty Practices, Optimal Restitution and Deterrence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1