{"title":"快速基选择方法","authors":"S. Cotter, M. Murthi, B. Rao","doi":"10.1109/ACSSC.1997.679149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper three methods of basis selection are considered: basic matching pursuit (BMP), order recursive matching pursuit (ORMP) and modified matching pursuit (MMP). These algorithms are briefly described and particular attention is paid, in the formulation of these algorithms, to the computation required. Fast versions of the algorithms are developed. The algorithms are evaluated in terms of their ability to produce a sparse solution and also in terms of their computational complexity and the storage necessary to implement them. Complexity-wise, BMP and MMP are shown to be comparable while ORMP is the most complex. In terms of their ability to select basis vectors, ORMP was the best followed by MMP and then BMP.","PeriodicalId":240431,"journal":{"name":"Conference Record of the Thirty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.97CB36136)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fast basis selection methods\",\"authors\":\"S. Cotter, M. Murthi, B. Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACSSC.1997.679149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper three methods of basis selection are considered: basic matching pursuit (BMP), order recursive matching pursuit (ORMP) and modified matching pursuit (MMP). These algorithms are briefly described and particular attention is paid, in the formulation of these algorithms, to the computation required. Fast versions of the algorithms are developed. The algorithms are evaluated in terms of their ability to produce a sparse solution and also in terms of their computational complexity and the storage necessary to implement them. Complexity-wise, BMP and MMP are shown to be comparable while ORMP is the most complex. In terms of their ability to select basis vectors, ORMP was the best followed by MMP and then BMP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":240431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conference Record of the Thirty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.97CB36136)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conference Record of the Thirty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.97CB36136)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.1997.679149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference Record of the Thirty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.97CB36136)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSSC.1997.679149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

本文考虑了基本匹配追踪(BMP)、顺序递归匹配追踪(ORMP)和改进匹配追踪(MMP)三种基本匹配追踪方法。对这些算法进行了简要描述,并在这些算法的制定中特别注意所需的计算。开发了快速版本的算法。这些算法是根据它们产生稀疏解的能力以及它们的计算复杂性和实现它们所需的存储来评估的。在复杂性方面,BMP和MMP具有可比性,而ORMP最为复杂。在选择基向量的能力方面,ORMP最好,其次是MMP,然后是BMP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fast basis selection methods
In this paper three methods of basis selection are considered: basic matching pursuit (BMP), order recursive matching pursuit (ORMP) and modified matching pursuit (MMP). These algorithms are briefly described and particular attention is paid, in the formulation of these algorithms, to the computation required. Fast versions of the algorithms are developed. The algorithms are evaluated in terms of their ability to produce a sparse solution and also in terms of their computational complexity and the storage necessary to implement them. Complexity-wise, BMP and MMP are shown to be comparable while ORMP is the most complex. In terms of their ability to select basis vectors, ORMP was the best followed by MMP and then BMP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of multiple accessing schemes Self-affine modeling of speech signal in speech compression A progressive transmission image coder using linear phase paraunitary filter banks A canonical representation for distributions of adaptive matched subspace detectors Finite length equalization for FFT-based multicarrier systems-an error-whitening viewpoint
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1