{"title":"特立尼达某海上油田IOR/EOR综合筛选","authors":"C. Garcia-james","doi":"10.2118/191176-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n An integrated benchmarking and screening study of IOR/EOR technologies used in analogous reservoirs worldwide was performed in the Southwest Soldado (SWS) Field offshore Trinidad, in order to establish the top three methods which could be implemented in this field to increase the recovery factor after more than 30 years producing under primary conditions.\n \n \n \n The evaluation of IOR/EOR processes for the Southwest Soldado Field was done in 2 stages. Stage 1 included screening of processes to identify the top 3 methods to be used. Stage 2 involved the detailed evaluation of the top 3 processes. For Stage 1, the National Petroleum Council EOR Screening Method was used along with innovative techniques recommended by industry literature (Taber et al., 1997, Pérez-Pérez et al., 2001). In Stage 2, standard statistical methods were applied to the compiled database of successful IOR/EOR projects in offshore sandstone reservoirs. That information was used to establish a predicted recovery factor for the top 3 IOR/EOR methods selected. A theoretical description of the selected methods and their relationship with Southwest Soldado characteristics was done. Finally, considerations for pilot projects with recommended facilities, required logistics and cost estimates were analyzed and the best options were recommended.\n \n \n \n Given the characteristics of the Southwest Soldado field, Water Alternate Gas (WAG) injection resulted with the highest score based on the benchmarking exercise; Carbon dioxide (CO2) injection and water injection were selected in second and third place respectively. In the case of CO2, it was recommended as Huff and Puff in order to delineate transition zones, for ease of application in existing wells and facilities and for comparatively low cost. This method also generates high oil recoveries in a relative short period of time. Finally, it was recommended that for the implementation of a pilot project, Huff and Puff CO2 injection should be tested prior to WAG injection due to the many advantages in evaluating the reservoirs, quick execution and rapid production results at the lowest investment cost from the other 2 methods evaluated.\n \n \n \n This paper presents the steps taken to benchmark an offshore field in Trinidad using the field's actual data. It lays the foundation for further development of heavy oil reserves in Southwest Soldado, highlights the challenges based on infrastructure, technology and economics requirements and provides a roadmap to further increase the recovery factor of these offshore heavy oil reservoirs.\n","PeriodicalId":415543,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, June 26, 2018","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated IOR/EOR Screening of an Offshore Oilfield in Trinidad\",\"authors\":\"C. Garcia-james\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/191176-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n An integrated benchmarking and screening study of IOR/EOR technologies used in analogous reservoirs worldwide was performed in the Southwest Soldado (SWS) Field offshore Trinidad, in order to establish the top three methods which could be implemented in this field to increase the recovery factor after more than 30 years producing under primary conditions.\\n \\n \\n \\n The evaluation of IOR/EOR processes for the Southwest Soldado Field was done in 2 stages. Stage 1 included screening of processes to identify the top 3 methods to be used. Stage 2 involved the detailed evaluation of the top 3 processes. For Stage 1, the National Petroleum Council EOR Screening Method was used along with innovative techniques recommended by industry literature (Taber et al., 1997, Pérez-Pérez et al., 2001). In Stage 2, standard statistical methods were applied to the compiled database of successful IOR/EOR projects in offshore sandstone reservoirs. That information was used to establish a predicted recovery factor for the top 3 IOR/EOR methods selected. A theoretical description of the selected methods and their relationship with Southwest Soldado characteristics was done. Finally, considerations for pilot projects with recommended facilities, required logistics and cost estimates were analyzed and the best options were recommended.\\n \\n \\n \\n Given the characteristics of the Southwest Soldado field, Water Alternate Gas (WAG) injection resulted with the highest score based on the benchmarking exercise; Carbon dioxide (CO2) injection and water injection were selected in second and third place respectively. In the case of CO2, it was recommended as Huff and Puff in order to delineate transition zones, for ease of application in existing wells and facilities and for comparatively low cost. This method also generates high oil recoveries in a relative short period of time. Finally, it was recommended that for the implementation of a pilot project, Huff and Puff CO2 injection should be tested prior to WAG injection due to the many advantages in evaluating the reservoirs, quick execution and rapid production results at the lowest investment cost from the other 2 methods evaluated.\\n \\n \\n \\n This paper presents the steps taken to benchmark an offshore field in Trinidad using the field's actual data. It lays the foundation for further development of heavy oil reserves in Southwest Soldado, highlights the challenges based on infrastructure, technology and economics requirements and provides a roadmap to further increase the recovery factor of these offshore heavy oil reservoirs.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":415543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, June 26, 2018\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, June 26, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/191176-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, June 26, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191176-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
在特立尼达海上的西南Soldado (SWS)油田,对全球类似油藏中使用的IOR/EOR技术进行了综合基准测试和筛选研究,以确定该油田在原始条件下生产30多年后提高采收率的最佳三种方法。对西南Soldado油田的IOR/EOR工艺进行了两个阶段的评估。第一阶段包括筛选过程,以确定最常用的3种方法。第二阶段包括对前3个过程的详细评价。在第一阶段,使用国家石油委员会EOR筛选方法以及行业文献推荐的创新技术(Taber et al., 1997; psamrez - psamrez et al., 2001)。在第二阶段,将标准统计方法应用于编制的海上砂岩储层IOR/EOR成功项目数据库。这些信息被用来为选择的前3种IOR/EOR方法建立预测的采收率。对所选择的方法及其与西南索尔达多特征的关系进行了理论描述。最后,分析了具有推荐设施、所需物流和成本估算的试点项目的考虑因素,并提出了最佳选择。考虑到西南Soldado油田的特点,在基准测试中,水替代气(WAG)注入获得了最高的分数;二氧化碳(CO2)注入和水注入分别被选为第二和第三名。在二氧化碳的情况下,建议使用Huff和Puff来划定过渡区,以便于在现有的井和设施中应用,并且成本相对较低。这种方法还可以在相对较短的时间内实现高采收率。最后,对于试点项目的实施,建议在WAG注入之前进行Huff和Puff CO2注入测试,因为与其他两种评估方法相比,这两种方法在评估储层、快速执行和快速产出结果方面具有许多优势,投资成本最低。本文介绍了利用特立尼达海上油田的实际数据进行基准测试所采取的步骤。为进一步开发Soldado西南部稠油储量奠定了基础,突出了基础设施、技术和经济要求方面的挑战,并为进一步提高海上稠油油藏的采收率提供了路线图。
Integrated IOR/EOR Screening of an Offshore Oilfield in Trinidad
An integrated benchmarking and screening study of IOR/EOR technologies used in analogous reservoirs worldwide was performed in the Southwest Soldado (SWS) Field offshore Trinidad, in order to establish the top three methods which could be implemented in this field to increase the recovery factor after more than 30 years producing under primary conditions.
The evaluation of IOR/EOR processes for the Southwest Soldado Field was done in 2 stages. Stage 1 included screening of processes to identify the top 3 methods to be used. Stage 2 involved the detailed evaluation of the top 3 processes. For Stage 1, the National Petroleum Council EOR Screening Method was used along with innovative techniques recommended by industry literature (Taber et al., 1997, Pérez-Pérez et al., 2001). In Stage 2, standard statistical methods were applied to the compiled database of successful IOR/EOR projects in offshore sandstone reservoirs. That information was used to establish a predicted recovery factor for the top 3 IOR/EOR methods selected. A theoretical description of the selected methods and their relationship with Southwest Soldado characteristics was done. Finally, considerations for pilot projects with recommended facilities, required logistics and cost estimates were analyzed and the best options were recommended.
Given the characteristics of the Southwest Soldado field, Water Alternate Gas (WAG) injection resulted with the highest score based on the benchmarking exercise; Carbon dioxide (CO2) injection and water injection were selected in second and third place respectively. In the case of CO2, it was recommended as Huff and Puff in order to delineate transition zones, for ease of application in existing wells and facilities and for comparatively low cost. This method also generates high oil recoveries in a relative short period of time. Finally, it was recommended that for the implementation of a pilot project, Huff and Puff CO2 injection should be tested prior to WAG injection due to the many advantages in evaluating the reservoirs, quick execution and rapid production results at the lowest investment cost from the other 2 methods evaluated.
This paper presents the steps taken to benchmark an offshore field in Trinidad using the field's actual data. It lays the foundation for further development of heavy oil reserves in Southwest Soldado, highlights the challenges based on infrastructure, technology and economics requirements and provides a roadmap to further increase the recovery factor of these offshore heavy oil reservoirs.