跨学科科学新兴领域的合作模式:以可持续性科学为例

Masaru Yarime, Y. Takeda, Y. Kajikawa
{"title":"跨学科科学新兴领域的合作模式:以可持续性科学为例","authors":"Masaru Yarime, Y. Takeda, Y. Kajikawa","doi":"10.1109/PICMET.2008.4599621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the patterns of collaboration over national and disciplinary boundaries in emerging fields of trans-disciplinary science, taking the case of sustainability science as an example. Bibliometric data is used for empirical analysis. The patterns of collaboration on sustainability science show that research collaboration tends to be conducted between countries which are geographically located closely. That suggests that communication and information exchange could be limited within regional clusters. As the focused fields of research in sustainability science are different in each country, the formation of regional clusters could be a serious obstacle to collecting, exchanging, and integrating diverse types of knowledge, which is of critical importance in establishing the trans-disciplinary field of sustainability science. To address the challenge of knowledge integration, new types of organizational and institutional arrangements are emerging for research collaboration. Implications for organizational and institutional arrangements are discussed. The extent of knowledge integration between different disciplines in sustainability science is investigated.","PeriodicalId":168329,"journal":{"name":"PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of collaboration in emerging fields of trans-disciplinary science: The case of sustainability science\",\"authors\":\"Masaru Yarime, Y. Takeda, Y. Kajikawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PICMET.2008.4599621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the patterns of collaboration over national and disciplinary boundaries in emerging fields of trans-disciplinary science, taking the case of sustainability science as an example. Bibliometric data is used for empirical analysis. The patterns of collaboration on sustainability science show that research collaboration tends to be conducted between countries which are geographically located closely. That suggests that communication and information exchange could be limited within regional clusters. As the focused fields of research in sustainability science are different in each country, the formation of regional clusters could be a serious obstacle to collecting, exchanging, and integrating diverse types of knowledge, which is of critical importance in establishing the trans-disciplinary field of sustainability science. To address the challenge of knowledge integration, new types of organizational and institutional arrangements are emerging for research collaboration. Implications for organizational and institutional arrangements are discussed. The extent of knowledge integration between different disciplines in sustainability science is investigated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2008.4599621\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2008.4599621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文以可持续发展科学为例,探讨了新兴跨学科科学领域中跨越国家和学科界限的合作模式。文献计量学数据用于实证分析。可持续性科学的合作模式表明,研究合作倾向于在地理位置接近的国家之间进行。这表明通信和信息交流可以限制在区域集群内。由于各国可持续科学研究的重点领域不同,区域集群的形成可能严重阻碍不同类型知识的收集、交流和整合,而这对于建立跨学科的可持续科学领域至关重要。为了应对知识整合的挑战,新型的科研合作组织和制度安排正在出现。讨论了对组织和体制安排的影响。研究了可持续发展科学中不同学科之间的知识整合程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patterns of collaboration in emerging fields of trans-disciplinary science: The case of sustainability science
This paper examines the patterns of collaboration over national and disciplinary boundaries in emerging fields of trans-disciplinary science, taking the case of sustainability science as an example. Bibliometric data is used for empirical analysis. The patterns of collaboration on sustainability science show that research collaboration tends to be conducted between countries which are geographically located closely. That suggests that communication and information exchange could be limited within regional clusters. As the focused fields of research in sustainability science are different in each country, the formation of regional clusters could be a serious obstacle to collecting, exchanging, and integrating diverse types of knowledge, which is of critical importance in establishing the trans-disciplinary field of sustainability science. To address the challenge of knowledge integration, new types of organizational and institutional arrangements are emerging for research collaboration. Implications for organizational and institutional arrangements are discussed. The extent of knowledge integration between different disciplines in sustainability science is investigated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding the emergence of disruptive innovation in Air Force science and technology organizations A future-based risk assessment for the survivability of long-range strike systems The nature of engineering work in innovation activities Towards systematic innovation methods: Innovation support technology that integrates business modeling, roadmapping and innovation architecture The leverage effect of holistic engineering and technology management to sustain a developing economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1